西班牙语使用者阅读理解的直接和推理中介模式的适应性:系统回顾

Juan Martínez-Cubelos , Juan Cruz Ripoll Salceda
{"title":"西班牙语使用者阅读理解的直接和推理中介模式的适应性:系统回顾","authors":"Juan Martínez-Cubelos ,&nbsp;Juan Cruz Ripoll Salceda","doi":"10.1016/j.psicoe.2022.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The direct and inferential mediation model proposes that reading comprehension is the result of relationships between prior knowledge<span>, decoding, strategies, vocabulary, and inferential ability. The original model includes causal relationships, established when evidence of the direct effect of one of the components on another is found, and correlational relationships, proposed between some components when no causal evidence is found. The objective of this study is to adapt the model for Spanish speakers based on a systematic review<span>. The causal relationships and the proposed correlations are supported by a single study or a meta-analysis, in both cases the effect size is significant. Causal relationships are also established when the effect size is not significant, but substantially important. Forty-three intervention studies are selected that support five causal relationships: from strategies, vocabulary and inferential ability to reading comprehension; and from prior knowledge and strategies to inferential ability. Seventy-four correlational studies that support seven correlations are also selected: between prior knowledge and reading comprehension; decoding and reading comprehension; strategies and prior knowledge; vocabulary and inferential ability; decoding and vocabulary; decoding and prior knowledge; and decoding and inferential ability. The effect sizes of the causal relationships are between </span></span></span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.47 and <em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.16, and the effect sizes of the correlations between <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.2 and <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.47.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101103,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 186-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension for Spanish speakers: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Juan Martínez-Cubelos ,&nbsp;Juan Cruz Ripoll Salceda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psicoe.2022.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The direct and inferential mediation model proposes that reading comprehension is the result of relationships between prior knowledge<span>, decoding, strategies, vocabulary, and inferential ability. The original model includes causal relationships, established when evidence of the direct effect of one of the components on another is found, and correlational relationships, proposed between some components when no causal evidence is found. The objective of this study is to adapt the model for Spanish speakers based on a systematic review<span>. The causal relationships and the proposed correlations are supported by a single study or a meta-analysis, in both cases the effect size is significant. Causal relationships are also established when the effect size is not significant, but substantially important. Forty-three intervention studies are selected that support five causal relationships: from strategies, vocabulary and inferential ability to reading comprehension; and from prior knowledge and strategies to inferential ability. Seventy-four correlational studies that support seven correlations are also selected: between prior knowledge and reading comprehension; decoding and reading comprehension; strategies and prior knowledge; vocabulary and inferential ability; decoding and vocabulary; decoding and prior knowledge; and decoding and inferential ability. The effect sizes of the causal relationships are between </span></span></span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.47 and <em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.16, and the effect sizes of the correlations between <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.2 and <em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.47.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 186-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530380522000119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530380522000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接和推理中介模型认为,阅读理解是先验知识、解码、策略、词汇和推理能力之间关系的结果。原始模型包括当发现一个成分对另一个成分直接影响的证据时建立的因果关系,以及当没有发现因果证据时在一些成分之间提出的相关关系。本研究的目的是在系统综述的基础上,为讲西班牙语的人调整该模型。因果关系和所提出的相关性得到了单一研究或荟萃分析的支持,在这两种情况下,效应大小都是显著的。当效应大小不显著,但实质上很重要时,也会建立因果关系。选择了43项干预研究,支持五种因果关系:从策略、词汇和推理能力到阅读理解;从先验知识和策略到推理能力。还选择了74项支持七种相关性的相关性研究:先验知识和阅读理解之间的相关性;解码与阅读理解;战略和先验知识;词汇与推理能力;解码和词汇;解码和先验知识;以及解码和推理能力。因果关系的效应大小在g=0.47和g=1.16之间,相关性的效应大小则在r=.2和r=.47之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adaptation of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension for Spanish speakers: A systematic review

The direct and inferential mediation model proposes that reading comprehension is the result of relationships between prior knowledge, decoding, strategies, vocabulary, and inferential ability. The original model includes causal relationships, established when evidence of the direct effect of one of the components on another is found, and correlational relationships, proposed between some components when no causal evidence is found. The objective of this study is to adapt the model for Spanish speakers based on a systematic review. The causal relationships and the proposed correlations are supported by a single study or a meta-analysis, in both cases the effect size is significant. Causal relationships are also established when the effect size is not significant, but substantially important. Forty-three intervention studies are selected that support five causal relationships: from strategies, vocabulary and inferential ability to reading comprehension; and from prior knowledge and strategies to inferential ability. Seventy-four correlational studies that support seven correlations are also selected: between prior knowledge and reading comprehension; decoding and reading comprehension; strategies and prior knowledge; vocabulary and inferential ability; decoding and vocabulary; decoding and prior knowledge; and decoding and inferential ability. The effect sizes of the causal relationships are between g = 0.47 and g = 1.16, and the effect sizes of the correlations between r = .2 and r = .47.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting the pre-service teachers’ teaching intention from educator-created (dis)empowering climates: A self-determination theory-based longitudinal approach Noticing the unnoticed: Teacher self-efficacy as a mediator between school context and teacher burnout in developing regions Using profile analysis and ROC curves to examine the relationship between perfectionism and academic self-efficacy in secondary school students Active break as a tool for improving attention in the educational context. A systematic review and meta-analysis Efficacy of a multi-risk internet prevention program: Safety.net
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1