{"title":"在Hosios kai Dikaios的献礼者中的酒神协会重访最近在西北加拉提亚Mihalıççık地区发表的铭文","authors":"A. Coşkun","doi":"10.37095/gephyra.710613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four new epigraphic finds from the Mihaliccik District encourage us to reconsider the role that villages and associations played among those who made dedications to the divine pair Hosios kai Dikaios. According to the distribution of the evidence, the cult originated and remained concentrated on the north-east of Phrygia Epiktetos, but spread all over western Asia Minor and even beyond. After surveying the documents known previously especially thanks to M. Ricl (1991; 1992a; 2008) and classifying elements of the dedication formula, slightly improved readings and interpretations are offered for the five inscriptions (re-) published by H. Guney (2018a): twice, the imperial slave Chryseros is attested as fulfilling vows to the gods together with his fellow villagers (nos. 2, 3); three other instances, however, involve associations: perhaps a Β[ακχῖ]ον, the obscure Παρ[---]διᾶται, and the Κταηνοῖ, further specified as the Βα χῖον τὸ πeρὶ Τύραννον (nos. 4, 5, 1). The combined evidence catalogued by Ricl and Guney adds up to some 185 dedications to Hosios kai Dikaios, including, in their views, 17 cases that originated from village communities, compared to only two by associations. The present study argues instead that the ascertained evidence for villages is only six and that this is on par with the documentation of associations. All six of the latter can be identified as Dionysiac thiasoi.","PeriodicalId":37539,"journal":{"name":"Gephyra","volume":"134 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dionysiac Associations among the Dedicants of Hosios kai Dikaios Revisiting Recently Published Inscriptions from the Mihalıççık District in North-West Galatia\",\"authors\":\"A. Coşkun\",\"doi\":\"10.37095/gephyra.710613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Four new epigraphic finds from the Mihaliccik District encourage us to reconsider the role that villages and associations played among those who made dedications to the divine pair Hosios kai Dikaios. According to the distribution of the evidence, the cult originated and remained concentrated on the north-east of Phrygia Epiktetos, but spread all over western Asia Minor and even beyond. After surveying the documents known previously especially thanks to M. Ricl (1991; 1992a; 2008) and classifying elements of the dedication formula, slightly improved readings and interpretations are offered for the five inscriptions (re-) published by H. Guney (2018a): twice, the imperial slave Chryseros is attested as fulfilling vows to the gods together with his fellow villagers (nos. 2, 3); three other instances, however, involve associations: perhaps a Β[ακχῖ]ον, the obscure Παρ[---]διᾶται, and the Κταηνοῖ, further specified as the Βα χῖον τὸ πeρὶ Τύραννον (nos. 4, 5, 1). The combined evidence catalogued by Ricl and Guney adds up to some 185 dedications to Hosios kai Dikaios, including, in their views, 17 cases that originated from village communities, compared to only two by associations. The present study argues instead that the ascertained evidence for villages is only six and that this is on par with the documentation of associations. All six of the latter can be identified as Dionysiac thiasoi.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gephyra\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gephyra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.710613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gephyra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.710613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
在Mihaliccik地区发现的四个新的铭文鼓励我们重新考虑村庄和协会在那些向神圣的Hosios kai Dikaios奉献的人中所扮演的角色。根据证据的分布,该邪教起源于并集中在弗里吉亚埃皮克特托斯的东北部,但传播到小亚细亚西部甚至更远的地方。在调查了以前特别感谢M. Ricl (1991;1992年;2008)并对奉献公式的要素进行分类,对H. Guney (2018a)出版的五个铭文(重新)提供了略微改进的阅读和解释:两次,帝国奴隶Chryseros被证明与他的村民一起履行了对神的誓言(第2,3号);然而,其他三个例子涉及关联:可能是Β[ακχ ο]ον,晦涩的Παρ[-]δι ο ται,以及Κταηνο ν,进一步指定为Βα χ ο ον τ ο π ρ ν Τύραννον(第4,5,1号)。由Ricl和Guney分类的综合证据加起来,大约有185个关于Hosios kai Dikaios的贡献,其中包括,在他们看来,17个案例来自村庄社区,而只有两个来自协会。相反,目前的研究认为,关于村庄的确定证据只有6个,这与协会的文件相当。后六种都可以被认定为酒神。
Dionysiac Associations among the Dedicants of Hosios kai Dikaios Revisiting Recently Published Inscriptions from the Mihalıççık District in North-West Galatia
Four new epigraphic finds from the Mihaliccik District encourage us to reconsider the role that villages and associations played among those who made dedications to the divine pair Hosios kai Dikaios. According to the distribution of the evidence, the cult originated and remained concentrated on the north-east of Phrygia Epiktetos, but spread all over western Asia Minor and even beyond. After surveying the documents known previously especially thanks to M. Ricl (1991; 1992a; 2008) and classifying elements of the dedication formula, slightly improved readings and interpretations are offered for the five inscriptions (re-) published by H. Guney (2018a): twice, the imperial slave Chryseros is attested as fulfilling vows to the gods together with his fellow villagers (nos. 2, 3); three other instances, however, involve associations: perhaps a Β[ακχῖ]ον, the obscure Παρ[---]διᾶται, and the Κταηνοῖ, further specified as the Βα χῖον τὸ πeρὶ Τύραννον (nos. 4, 5, 1). The combined evidence catalogued by Ricl and Guney adds up to some 185 dedications to Hosios kai Dikaios, including, in their views, 17 cases that originated from village communities, compared to only two by associations. The present study argues instead that the ascertained evidence for villages is only six and that this is on par with the documentation of associations. All six of the latter can be identified as Dionysiac thiasoi.
GephyraArts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Gephyra - a Journal for the Ancient History and Cultures of the Eastern Mediterranean - is an open access publication platform for articles from all fields of research into Asia Minor and the Eastern Mediterranean, insofar as they shed new light on the history and culture of this geographical and historical region. Scope: Epigraphic, archaeological, numismatic and art historical contributions, commented and evaluated material presentations, as well as historical reflections and essays are all equally welcome.