我们时代的贸易政策碰撞:中国的补贴遭遇阿巴·勒纳和大卫·里卡多

Dan Ciuriak
{"title":"我们时代的贸易政策碰撞:中国的补贴遭遇阿巴·勒纳和大卫·里卡多","authors":"Dan Ciuriak","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3789391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note takes a contrarian position on the significance of China’s subsidies, which are generally viewed as intractable and damaging to the rules-based system. It considers the implications of Lerner Symmetry for the aggregate effect of China’s subsidies and the implications of comparative advantage for the differential effects across industries, in a context where the effective differential tax burdens are unknown, as indeed is also the case with differential effects of tax and subsidy regimes in the rest of the world. It concludes that the net effect of China’s subsidies is much less than commonly supposed and that differential effects that may be damaging can be handled, as they have been in the past, through tools available under the WTO Agreement.","PeriodicalId":14394,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Trade Policy Collision of Our Times: China’s Subsidies Encounter Abba Lerner and David Ricardo\",\"authors\":\"Dan Ciuriak\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3789391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note takes a contrarian position on the significance of China’s subsidies, which are generally viewed as intractable and damaging to the rules-based system. It considers the implications of Lerner Symmetry for the aggregate effect of China’s subsidies and the implications of comparative advantage for the differential effects across industries, in a context where the effective differential tax burdens are unknown, as indeed is also the case with differential effects of tax and subsidy regimes in the rest of the world. It concludes that the net effect of China’s subsidies is much less than commonly supposed and that differential effects that may be damaging can be handled, as they have been in the past, through tools available under the WTO Agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3789391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3789391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对中国补贴的重要性采取了相反的立场,中国的补贴通常被视为难以处理,对基于规则的体系具有破坏性。本文考虑了勒纳对称对中国补贴总体效应的影响,以及比较优势对跨行业差异效应的影响,在实际差异税负未知的背景下,事实上,世界其他地区税收和补贴制度的差异效应也是如此。报告的结论是,中国补贴的净效应远低于通常的预期,而且可能造成损害的差异效应可以像过去一样,通过《WTO协定》规定的工具加以处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Trade Policy Collision of Our Times: China’s Subsidies Encounter Abba Lerner and David Ricardo
This note takes a contrarian position on the significance of China’s subsidies, which are generally viewed as intractable and damaging to the rules-based system. It considers the implications of Lerner Symmetry for the aggregate effect of China’s subsidies and the implications of comparative advantage for the differential effects across industries, in a context where the effective differential tax burdens are unknown, as indeed is also the case with differential effects of tax and subsidy regimes in the rest of the world. It concludes that the net effect of China’s subsidies is much less than commonly supposed and that differential effects that may be damaging can be handled, as they have been in the past, through tools available under the WTO Agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trade Openness and Growth: A Network-Based Approach Rome and the Road to the Distant East El cambio estructural y las exportaciones en la economía colombiana (2005-2015) (Structural Change and Exports in the Colombian Economy (2005-2015)) Foreign Direct Investment, Global Value Chains, and Labor Rights: No Race-to-the-Bottom? The Impact of Global Value Chain on the Performance on SMEs Special Reference on East Asian Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1