语音质量评价中一步策略与两步策略的区别

Wei Wei, Wang Jing
{"title":"语音质量评价中一步策略与两步策略的区别","authors":"Wei Wei, Wang Jing","doi":"10.1109/IICSPI.2018.8690383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategies used in methods for objective speech quality evaluation can be classified into two main categories namely one step and two-step strategy. The one-step strategy aims at an algorithm or structure which transforms speech representation directly into a scalar, and the two-steps strategy often divides the evaluation procedure into two subsequent stages. Generally speaking, it constructs firstly objective measurements predefined for the disturbance within speech signal, and then accumulates the measurements to a single value which is similar to the opinion score. The two-step strategy has been developed ahead of one step strategy, leading to the study of the one step strategy. This paper describes the principles and essential elements in these strategies, compares the differences between them, and analyses the merits and drawbacks in these methods. Some criteria regarding to the method selection in speech quality evaluation which are based mainly on the research scenario are suggested at the end of the paper.","PeriodicalId":6673,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference of Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI)","volume":"21 1","pages":"780-783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Differences Behind One Step and Two Steps Strategies in Speech Quality Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Wei Wei, Wang Jing\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IICSPI.2018.8690383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Strategies used in methods for objective speech quality evaluation can be classified into two main categories namely one step and two-step strategy. The one-step strategy aims at an algorithm or structure which transforms speech representation directly into a scalar, and the two-steps strategy often divides the evaluation procedure into two subsequent stages. Generally speaking, it constructs firstly objective measurements predefined for the disturbance within speech signal, and then accumulates the measurements to a single value which is similar to the opinion score. The two-step strategy has been developed ahead of one step strategy, leading to the study of the one step strategy. This paper describes the principles and essential elements in these strategies, compares the differences between them, and analyses the merits and drawbacks in these methods. Some criteria regarding to the method selection in speech quality evaluation which are based mainly on the research scenario are suggested at the end of the paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference of Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"780-783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference of Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IICSPI.2018.8690383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference of Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IICSPI.2018.8690383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客观语音质量评价方法中使用的策略可分为两大类,即一步策略和两步策略。一步策略旨在将语音表示直接转换为标量的算法或结构,而两步策略通常将评估过程分为两个后续阶段。一般来说,它首先对语音信号中的干扰预先定义客观测量值,然后将测量值累积成一个类似于意见评分的单一值。两步策略先于一步策略发展起来,导致了对一步策略的研究。本文阐述了这些策略的原理和基本要素,比较了它们之间的差异,并分析了这些策略的优缺点。最后提出了基于研究场景的语音质量评价方法选择准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the Differences Behind One Step and Two Steps Strategies in Speech Quality Evaluation
Strategies used in methods for objective speech quality evaluation can be classified into two main categories namely one step and two-step strategy. The one-step strategy aims at an algorithm or structure which transforms speech representation directly into a scalar, and the two-steps strategy often divides the evaluation procedure into two subsequent stages. Generally speaking, it constructs firstly objective measurements predefined for the disturbance within speech signal, and then accumulates the measurements to a single value which is similar to the opinion score. The two-step strategy has been developed ahead of one step strategy, leading to the study of the one step strategy. This paper describes the principles and essential elements in these strategies, compares the differences between them, and analyses the merits and drawbacks in these methods. Some criteria regarding to the method selection in speech quality evaluation which are based mainly on the research scenario are suggested at the end of the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Functional Safety Analysis and Design of Dual-Motor Hybrid Bus Clutch System Methods of Resource Allocation with Conflict Detection Exploration and Application of Sheet Metal Technology on Pit Package Repairing Study on Standardization of Electrolytic Trace Moisture Meter in Safety Construction of CNG Refueling Station The Research and Analysis of Big Data Application on Distribution Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1