缉拿罪犯:商品服务税新闻报道中的反暴利与执法话语

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES Kajian Malaysia Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.21315/km2019.37.2.2
Cheng Teik Ong, Hajar Abdul Rahim
{"title":"缉拿罪犯:商品服务税新闻报道中的反暴利与执法话语","authors":"Cheng Teik Ong, Hajar Abdul Rahim","doi":"10.21315/km2019.37.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A series of false starts and deferments since the 1980s preceded the eventual implementation of the goods and services tax (GST) in Malaysia on 1 April 2014 amidst adverse economic conditions, public resentment and hostility from certain quarters. In order to neutralise such negative reception, the former Barisan Nasional (BN) government embarked on a series of initiatives, programmes and campaigns to educate the public on the benefits of the GST to the country, one of which was the setting up of GST Malaysia Info, a website whose original aim was to disseminate positive news and to promote the GST to the public. As the recent implementation of the GST bore on all sections of the Malaysian society, a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of selected news articles on the website was carried out to uncover the various discourses related to the GST to portray the government’s position on the issue of the GST. The paper will present part of the findings of a larger study related to the discourse of anti-profiteering and law enforcement and the representation of its attendant aspects and circumstances. Predicated on Fairclough’s (1989; 2001; 2015) Critical Discourse Analysis, the study sheds light on the mainstream media’s favourable representation of the former BN government and its machinery and pejorative representation of the GST perpetrators and offenders through the use of lexical words with experiential values.","PeriodicalId":43145,"journal":{"name":"Kajian Malaysia","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apprehending the Culprits: The Discourse of Anti-Profiteering and Law Enforcement in Goods and Services Tax (GST) News Reports\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Teik Ong, Hajar Abdul Rahim\",\"doi\":\"10.21315/km2019.37.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A series of false starts and deferments since the 1980s preceded the eventual implementation of the goods and services tax (GST) in Malaysia on 1 April 2014 amidst adverse economic conditions, public resentment and hostility from certain quarters. In order to neutralise such negative reception, the former Barisan Nasional (BN) government embarked on a series of initiatives, programmes and campaigns to educate the public on the benefits of the GST to the country, one of which was the setting up of GST Malaysia Info, a website whose original aim was to disseminate positive news and to promote the GST to the public. As the recent implementation of the GST bore on all sections of the Malaysian society, a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of selected news articles on the website was carried out to uncover the various discourses related to the GST to portray the government’s position on the issue of the GST. The paper will present part of the findings of a larger study related to the discourse of anti-profiteering and law enforcement and the representation of its attendant aspects and circumstances. Predicated on Fairclough’s (1989; 2001; 2015) Critical Discourse Analysis, the study sheds light on the mainstream media’s favourable representation of the former BN government and its machinery and pejorative representation of the GST perpetrators and offenders through the use of lexical words with experiential values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kajian Malaysia\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kajian Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21315/km2019.37.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kajian Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/km2019.37.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪80年代以来,由于不利的经济条件、公众的不满和某些方面的敌意,马来西亚最终于2014年4月1日实施了商品和服务税(GST)。为了消除这种负面影响,前国阵政府开始了一系列的倡议、计划和运动,以教育公众商品及服务税对国家的好处,其中之一是建立了一个网站,其最初的目的是传播积极的消息,并向公众推广商品及服务税。由于最近商品及服务税的实施对马来西亚社会的各个阶层都有影响,我们对网站上精选的新闻文章进行了批判性话语分析(CDA),以揭示与商品及服务税相关的各种话语,以描绘政府在商品及服务税问题上的立场。本文将介绍一项大型研究的部分结果,该研究涉及反暴利和执法的论述及其相关方面和情况的表现。基于费尔克劳(1989;2001;2015)批判性话语分析,该研究通过使用具有经验价值的词汇,揭示了主流媒体对前国阵政府及其机制的有利代表以及对商品及服务税肇事者和罪犯的轻蔑代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Apprehending the Culprits: The Discourse of Anti-Profiteering and Law Enforcement in Goods and Services Tax (GST) News Reports
A series of false starts and deferments since the 1980s preceded the eventual implementation of the goods and services tax (GST) in Malaysia on 1 April 2014 amidst adverse economic conditions, public resentment and hostility from certain quarters. In order to neutralise such negative reception, the former Barisan Nasional (BN) government embarked on a series of initiatives, programmes and campaigns to educate the public on the benefits of the GST to the country, one of which was the setting up of GST Malaysia Info, a website whose original aim was to disseminate positive news and to promote the GST to the public. As the recent implementation of the GST bore on all sections of the Malaysian society, a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of selected news articles on the website was carried out to uncover the various discourses related to the GST to portray the government’s position on the issue of the GST. The paper will present part of the findings of a larger study related to the discourse of anti-profiteering and law enforcement and the representation of its attendant aspects and circumstances. Predicated on Fairclough’s (1989; 2001; 2015) Critical Discourse Analysis, the study sheds light on the mainstream media’s favourable representation of the former BN government and its machinery and pejorative representation of the GST perpetrators and offenders through the use of lexical words with experiential values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kajian Malaysia
Kajian Malaysia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intergenerational Ambivalence and Negotiations: Malaysian Chinese Family Dynamics in the Film The Journey Dynamic of Diversity of Rate Establishment in the Practice of Agricultural Zakat Collection in Malaysia Parliamentary Institutional Reforms in Malaysia: The Case of the Pakatan Harapan Era, 2018–2020 Get the Jab: Government Multisemiotic Legitimation of COVID-19 Vaccines in Malaysia River and Aquatic Insect: Awareness Level of Visitors at Recreational Rivers in the Northern Region of Peninsular Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1