稠油油藏开发中钻井进度的优化

L. F. Lamas, V. Botechia, D. Schiozer, M. Delshad
{"title":"稠油油藏开发中钻井进度的优化","authors":"L. F. Lamas, V. Botechia, D. Schiozer, M. Delshad","doi":"10.5419/BJPG2017-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the development stage of a petroleum field, one important decision is to define the schedule for drilling the wells. Several general rules were listed for light and heavy oils. However, these rules are not always applicable and it may be important to use simulation models to test and choose the schedule. This paper consists of the development, implementation, and application of two different algorithms for optimization of wells drilling schedule. The first algorithm seeks, for each period, which well brings the best economic output. Once this well is selected, the second period of time is tested considering the remaining wells and this procedure is repeated until the last well. The second procedure is based on the reduction of search space where random schedules are generated and the best results maintained for the subsequent generation of scenarios, only allowing the wells to be drilled in the period that produced the best values of the objective function in the previous step. This procedure is repeated until each well converges to the period that results in the best economic return. Both algorithms were tested in two synthetic fields, based on the characteristics of offshore heavy oil and high average permeability reservoirs. To generate a benchmark for the solutions, a large amount of random schedules were tested and a normal distribution for net present values was generated. Both algorithms can be applied in any type of reservoirs, resulting in a very time consuming process in the cases where simulation time is very high. The results from both algorithms lead to net present values higher than at least 95% of the values from random schedules. For both cases, economic results were significantly better than those found for selecting strategy using wells ranking based in economic indicators, which is a common procedure. Both algorithms are also easy to implement and they can be inserted in a cycle of automated or assisted optimization process.","PeriodicalId":9312,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas","volume":"1 1","pages":"165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OPTIMIZATION FOR DRILLING SCHEDULE OF WELLS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF HEAVY OIL RESERVOIRS\",\"authors\":\"L. F. Lamas, V. Botechia, D. Schiozer, M. Delshad\",\"doi\":\"10.5419/BJPG2017-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the development stage of a petroleum field, one important decision is to define the schedule for drilling the wells. Several general rules were listed for light and heavy oils. However, these rules are not always applicable and it may be important to use simulation models to test and choose the schedule. This paper consists of the development, implementation, and application of two different algorithms for optimization of wells drilling schedule. The first algorithm seeks, for each period, which well brings the best economic output. Once this well is selected, the second period of time is tested considering the remaining wells and this procedure is repeated until the last well. The second procedure is based on the reduction of search space where random schedules are generated and the best results maintained for the subsequent generation of scenarios, only allowing the wells to be drilled in the period that produced the best values of the objective function in the previous step. This procedure is repeated until each well converges to the period that results in the best economic return. Both algorithms were tested in two synthetic fields, based on the characteristics of offshore heavy oil and high average permeability reservoirs. To generate a benchmark for the solutions, a large amount of random schedules were tested and a normal distribution for net present values was generated. Both algorithms can be applied in any type of reservoirs, resulting in a very time consuming process in the cases where simulation time is very high. The results from both algorithms lead to net present values higher than at least 95% of the values from random schedules. For both cases, economic results were significantly better than those found for selecting strategy using wells ranking based in economic indicators, which is a common procedure. Both algorithms are also easy to implement and they can be inserted in a cycle of automated or assisted optimization process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"165-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5419/BJPG2017-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5419/BJPG2017-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在油田开发阶段,一个重要的决策是确定钻井计划。列出了一些关于轻油和重油的一般规则。然而,这些规则并不总是适用的,使用模拟模型来测试和选择时间表可能很重要。本文包括两种不同的优化钻井进度算法的开发、实现和应用。第一种算法在每个周期内寻求最优经济产出。一旦选择了这口井,将考虑剩余的井进行第二段时间的测试,并重复该过程,直到最后一口井。第二个步骤是基于搜索空间的缩减,其中生成随机调度,并为后续场景保留最佳结果,仅允许在前一步中产生最佳目标函数值的时间段内钻井。这一过程反复进行,直到每口井收敛到产生最佳经济回报的时期。根据海上稠油和高平均渗透率油藏的特点,在两个合成油田对两种算法进行了测试。为了生成解决方案的基准,对大量随机时间表进行了测试,并生成了净现值的正态分布。这两种算法都可以应用于任何类型的油藏,但在模拟时间非常长的情况下,这一过程非常耗时。两种算法的结果导致净现值至少高于随机调度值的95%。在这两种情况下,经济效果都明显好于基于经济指标的井排名选择策略,后者是一种常用的方法。这两种算法也很容易实现,它们可以插入到自动或辅助优化过程的循环中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OPTIMIZATION FOR DRILLING SCHEDULE OF WELLS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF HEAVY OIL RESERVOIRS
During the development stage of a petroleum field, one important decision is to define the schedule for drilling the wells. Several general rules were listed for light and heavy oils. However, these rules are not always applicable and it may be important to use simulation models to test and choose the schedule. This paper consists of the development, implementation, and application of two different algorithms for optimization of wells drilling schedule. The first algorithm seeks, for each period, which well brings the best economic output. Once this well is selected, the second period of time is tested considering the remaining wells and this procedure is repeated until the last well. The second procedure is based on the reduction of search space where random schedules are generated and the best results maintained for the subsequent generation of scenarios, only allowing the wells to be drilled in the period that produced the best values of the objective function in the previous step. This procedure is repeated until each well converges to the period that results in the best economic return. Both algorithms were tested in two synthetic fields, based on the characteristics of offshore heavy oil and high average permeability reservoirs. To generate a benchmark for the solutions, a large amount of random schedules were tested and a normal distribution for net present values was generated. Both algorithms can be applied in any type of reservoirs, resulting in a very time consuming process in the cases where simulation time is very high. The results from both algorithms lead to net present values higher than at least 95% of the values from random schedules. For both cases, economic results were significantly better than those found for selecting strategy using wells ranking based in economic indicators, which is a common procedure. Both algorithms are also easy to implement and they can be inserted in a cycle of automated or assisted optimization process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMMISCIBLE VISCOUS FINGERING MODELING OF TERTIARY POLYMER FLOODING BASED ON REAL CASE OF HEAVY OIL RESERVOIR MODEL SYNTHETIC WATER-IN-OIL EMULSIONS: EFFECT OF OIL COMPOSITION ON STABILITY AND DEMULSIFIER PERFORMANCE WELL-TO-WELL (W2W) ELECTROMAGNETIC TOMOGRAPHY MODELING ADVANCEMENT: IMPROVING PRECISION AND EFFECTIVENESS WITH REGULARIZATION SCALE INHIBITOR SQUEEZE TREATMENT: AN ADVANCED BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS REACTIVE FLOW IN CARBONATE ROCKS FROM LACUSTRINE ENVIRONMENTS: THE EFFECTS OF PRESSURE AND FLUID SALINITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1