"嗯,我认为我的论点是…"或者是英语学习者语料库中的情态

IF 0.6 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Revista Espanola De Linguistica Aplicada Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1075/RESLA.29.1.01BAR
L. Bartley, E. Hidalgo-Tenorio
{"title":"\"嗯,我认为我的论点是…\"或者是英语学习者语料库中的情态","authors":"L. Bartley, E. Hidalgo-Tenorio","doi":"10.1075/RESLA.29.1.01BAR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linguistic modality is the expression of the speaker’s subjectivity including possibility, probability, necessity, obligation, permission, prohibition, and desire. This paper analyses a learner English corpus collected at two Spanish universities, paying special attention to which linguistic devices (e.g., modal verbs, adjectives, adverbs or nouns) English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students make use of when providing for and against arguments in their assignments. Applying a corpus-based methodology not only enabled comparisons to be made with other native and non-native data but also facilitated both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The findings show remarkable similarities and differences, and leave several issues at stake: the relationship between the degree of assertiveness of a text and (1) the student’s gender, (2) their command of the Foreign Language (FL), and (3) their familiarity with the genre they are expected to write in.","PeriodicalId":54145,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Linguistica Aplicada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Well, I think that my argument is…,” or modality in a learner corpus of English\",\"authors\":\"L. Bartley, E. Hidalgo-Tenorio\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/RESLA.29.1.01BAR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Linguistic modality is the expression of the speaker’s subjectivity including possibility, probability, necessity, obligation, permission, prohibition, and desire. This paper analyses a learner English corpus collected at two Spanish universities, paying special attention to which linguistic devices (e.g., modal verbs, adjectives, adverbs or nouns) English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students make use of when providing for and against arguments in their assignments. Applying a corpus-based methodology not only enabled comparisons to be made with other native and non-native data but also facilitated both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The findings show remarkable similarities and differences, and leave several issues at stake: the relationship between the degree of assertiveness of a text and (1) the student’s gender, (2) their command of the Foreign Language (FL), and (3) their familiarity with the genre they are expected to write in.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Linguistica Aplicada\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Linguistica Aplicada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/RESLA.29.1.01BAR\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Linguistica Aplicada","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/RESLA.29.1.01BAR","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

语态是说话人主体性的表现,包括可能性、概率、必要性、义务、允许、禁止和愿望。本文分析了西班牙两所大学的英语学习语料库,特别关注了作为外语的英语学生在作业中提出赞成和反对论点时所使用的语言手段(如情态动词、形容词、副词或名词)。应用基于语料库的方法不仅可以与其他本地和非本地数据进行比较,还可以促进定量和定性分析。研究结果显示了显著的相似性和差异,并留下了几个问题:文本的自信程度与(1)学生的性别之间的关系,(2)他们的外语(FL)的掌握程度,以及(3)他们对期望写作的体裁的熟悉程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Well, I think that my argument is…,” or modality in a learner corpus of English
Linguistic modality is the expression of the speaker’s subjectivity including possibility, probability, necessity, obligation, permission, prohibition, and desire. This paper analyses a learner English corpus collected at two Spanish universities, paying special attention to which linguistic devices (e.g., modal verbs, adjectives, adverbs or nouns) English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students make use of when providing for and against arguments in their assignments. Applying a corpus-based methodology not only enabled comparisons to be made with other native and non-native data but also facilitated both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The findings show remarkable similarities and differences, and leave several issues at stake: the relationship between the degree of assertiveness of a text and (1) the student’s gender, (2) their command of the Foreign Language (FL), and (3) their familiarity with the genre they are expected to write in.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Teaching listening for interpreting through mind mapping Sobre la enseñanza de la elisión sintáctica en la clase de gramática del español como lengua extranjera o segunda (ELE/L2) Engaging lower proficiency learners of Spanish in collaborative writing tasks Blurred lines: Un análisis crítico del discurso feminista The acquisition of voicing assimilation by advanced Hungarian learners of Spanish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1