间隔学习单元对学习和遗忘都有影响

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2022.100173
Jürgen Kornmeier , Zrinka Sosic-Vasic , Ellen Joos
{"title":"间隔学习单元对学习和遗忘都有影响","authors":"Jürgen Kornmeier ,&nbsp;Zrinka Sosic-Vasic ,&nbsp;Ellen Joos","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2022.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Spaced learning produces better learning performance than extended learning periods without or with little interruptions. This “spacing effect” exists on different time scales, ranging from seconds to months. We recently found large spacing effects with a hitherto rarely investigated 12-hours spacing interval.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The present study tested for potentially larger learning effects in the temporal vicinity of 12 h and analyzed spacing effects separately for learning and forgetting.</p><p>102 participants learned 40 German-Japanese vocabulary pairs in separate conditions with 7.5 min and 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-hours spacing intervals. Two final tests were executed after retention intervals of 24 h and 7 days.</p><p>The 7.5-min spacing interval produced a steeper initial learning curve than all other spacing intervals. 24 h after the last learning unit, we found almost no forgetting in the 4-, 8- and 12-hours spacing conditions, but about 9.3% and 3.6% forgetting in the 7.5 min and 24 h spacing conditions. After 7 days, forgetting was in the range of 13% for all conditions between 4 and 24 h. The 7.5 min condition produced 34% forgetting.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><p>Our results indicate that spacing intervals in the range of 8 h ± 4 h provide high learning performance and can be easily integrated in our daily schedules.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spacing learning units affects both learning and forgetting\",\"authors\":\"Jürgen Kornmeier ,&nbsp;Zrinka Sosic-Vasic ,&nbsp;Ellen Joos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2022.100173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Spaced learning produces better learning performance than extended learning periods without or with little interruptions. This “spacing effect” exists on different time scales, ranging from seconds to months. We recently found large spacing effects with a hitherto rarely investigated 12-hours spacing interval.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The present study tested for potentially larger learning effects in the temporal vicinity of 12 h and analyzed spacing effects separately for learning and forgetting.</p><p>102 participants learned 40 German-Japanese vocabulary pairs in separate conditions with 7.5 min and 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-hours spacing intervals. Two final tests were executed after retention intervals of 24 h and 7 days.</p><p>The 7.5-min spacing interval produced a steeper initial learning curve than all other spacing intervals. 24 h after the last learning unit, we found almost no forgetting in the 4-, 8- and 12-hours spacing conditions, but about 9.3% and 3.6% forgetting in the 7.5 min and 24 h spacing conditions. After 7 days, forgetting was in the range of 13% for all conditions between 4 and 24 h. The 7.5 min condition produced 34% forgetting.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><p>Our results indicate that spacing intervals in the range of 8 h ± 4 h provide high learning performance and can be easily integrated in our daily schedules.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949322000035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949322000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

间隔学习比没有或很少中断的长时间学习产生更好的学习效果。这种“间隔效应”存在于不同的时间尺度上,从秒到月不等。我们最近发现了很大的间距效应,迄今为止很少研究过的间距间隔为12小时。方法本研究考察了在12小时附近可能存在的较大的学习效应,并分别分析了间隔效应对学习和遗忘的影响。102名参与者分别在7.5分钟、4小时、8小时、12小时和24小时的间隔条件下学习了40对德语-日语词汇。保留间隔24 h和7 d后进行两次最终试验。7.5 min的井眼间隔比其他所有井眼间隔产生更陡峭的初始学习曲线。在最后一个学习单元后24 h,我们发现间隔4、8和12小时的学习单元几乎没有遗忘,而间隔7.5 min和24小时的学习单元遗忘率分别为9.3%和3.6%。7天后,在4到24小时内,所有条件下的遗忘率都在13%的范围内。7.5分钟条件下的遗忘率为34%。结果与结论我们的研究结果表明,在8 h±4 h范围内的间隔时间可以提供较高的学习性能,并且可以很容易地融入我们的日常计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spacing learning units affects both learning and forgetting

Background

Spaced learning produces better learning performance than extended learning periods without or with little interruptions. This “spacing effect” exists on different time scales, ranging from seconds to months. We recently found large spacing effects with a hitherto rarely investigated 12-hours spacing interval.

Methods

The present study tested for potentially larger learning effects in the temporal vicinity of 12 h and analyzed spacing effects separately for learning and forgetting.

102 participants learned 40 German-Japanese vocabulary pairs in separate conditions with 7.5 min and 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-hours spacing intervals. Two final tests were executed after retention intervals of 24 h and 7 days.

The 7.5-min spacing interval produced a steeper initial learning curve than all other spacing intervals. 24 h after the last learning unit, we found almost no forgetting in the 4-, 8- and 12-hours spacing conditions, but about 9.3% and 3.6% forgetting in the 7.5 min and 24 h spacing conditions. After 7 days, forgetting was in the range of 13% for all conditions between 4 and 24 h. The 7.5 min condition produced 34% forgetting.

Results and conclusion

Our results indicate that spacing intervals in the range of 8 h ± 4 h provide high learning performance and can be easily integrated in our daily schedules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts Mirror invariance in the subsequent acquisition of a script with separate forms for reading and writing Executive functions as predictors of learning prerequisites in preschool: A longitudinal study Integrating vision and somatosensation does not improve the accuracy and response time when estimating area and perimeter of rectangles in primary school The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: Using cognitive profiles to predict academic achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1