Integrating vision and somatosensation does not improve the accuracy and response time when estimating area and perimeter of rectangles in primary school

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2024.100238
{"title":"Integrating vision and somatosensation does not improve the accuracy and response time when estimating area and perimeter of rectangles in primary school","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2024.100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Problem-solving and learning in mathematics involves sensory perception and processing. Multisensory integration may contribute by enhancing sensory estimates. This study aims to assess if combining visual and somatosensory information improves elementary students' perimeter and area estimates.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>87 4th graders compared rectangles with respect to area or perimeter either solely using visual observation or additionally with somatosensory information. Three experiments targeted different task aspects. Statistical analyses tested success rates and response times.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Contrary to expectations, adding somatosensory information did not boost success rates for area and perimeter comparison. Response time even increased with adding somatosensory information. Children's difficulty in accurately tracing figures negatively impacted the success rate of area comparisons.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Results suggest visual observation alone suffices for accurately estimating and comparing area and perimeter of rectangles in 4th graders.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Careful deliberation on the inclusion of somatosensory information in mathematical tasks concerning perimeter and area estimations of rectangles is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221194932400019X/pdfft?md5=45649e85b31f4e8a8e336879d414cd3c&pid=1-s2.0-S221194932400019X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221194932400019X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Problem-solving and learning in mathematics involves sensory perception and processing. Multisensory integration may contribute by enhancing sensory estimates. This study aims to assess if combining visual and somatosensory information improves elementary students' perimeter and area estimates.

Methods

87 4th graders compared rectangles with respect to area or perimeter either solely using visual observation or additionally with somatosensory information. Three experiments targeted different task aspects. Statistical analyses tested success rates and response times.

Results

Contrary to expectations, adding somatosensory information did not boost success rates for area and perimeter comparison. Response time even increased with adding somatosensory information. Children's difficulty in accurately tracing figures negatively impacted the success rate of area comparisons.

Discussion

Results suggest visual observation alone suffices for accurately estimating and comparing area and perimeter of rectangles in 4th graders.

Implications

Careful deliberation on the inclusion of somatosensory information in mathematical tasks concerning perimeter and area estimations of rectangles is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在小学估算矩形的面积和周长时,将视觉和体感结合起来并不能提高准确性和缩短反应时间
背景数学问题的解决和学习涉及感官感知和处理。多感官整合可能有助于提高感官估计能力。本研究旨在评估视觉和体感信息的结合是否能提高小学生的周长和面积估计能力。方法87名四年级学生比较矩形的面积或周长,有的学生只通过视觉观察,有的学生则通过体感信息进行比较。三个实验针对不同的任务方面。结果与预期相反,增加体感信息并没有提高面积和周长比较的成功率。反应时间甚至随着体感信息的增加而增加。讨论结果表明,对于四年级学生来说,仅凭视觉观察就足以准确估算和比较矩形的面积和周长。 意义建议在有关矩形周长和面积估算的数学任务中加入体感信息,并仔细斟酌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1