全能银行、最优融资结构和银行业监管

Chun Chang, Xiaoming Li, Yiyao Wang
{"title":"全能银行、最优融资结构和银行业监管","authors":"Chun Chang, Xiaoming Li, Yiyao Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3733558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study how universal banking, that is, allowing banks to take equity positions in firms to which they lend, affects optimal financing structure and social welfare. Financing a firm through equity holding can improve a bank’s risk-taking incentive in restructuring the firm in bad times, but it is costly due to information asymmetry about the firm payoff in good times. We show a small increase in firm quality or bank capital ratio can cause the financing contract to switch from too much equity holding to too much debt financing, resulting in substantial welfare loss. Therefore, an equity holding restriction aiming at limiting banks’ excessive risk-taking may reduce welfare by overcorrecting the problem, and the optimal capital ratio may inevitably induce too much risk-taking.<br>","PeriodicalId":20999,"journal":{"name":"Regulation of Financial Institutions eJournal","volume":"156 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal Banking, Optimal Financing Structure, and Banking Regulations\",\"authors\":\"Chun Chang, Xiaoming Li, Yiyao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3733558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study how universal banking, that is, allowing banks to take equity positions in firms to which they lend, affects optimal financing structure and social welfare. Financing a firm through equity holding can improve a bank’s risk-taking incentive in restructuring the firm in bad times, but it is costly due to information asymmetry about the firm payoff in good times. We show a small increase in firm quality or bank capital ratio can cause the financing contract to switch from too much equity holding to too much debt financing, resulting in substantial welfare loss. Therefore, an equity holding restriction aiming at limiting banks’ excessive risk-taking may reduce welfare by overcorrecting the problem, and the optimal capital ratio may inevitably induce too much risk-taking.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulation of Financial Institutions eJournal\",\"volume\":\"156 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulation of Financial Institutions eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation of Financial Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了全能银行,即允许银行在其贷款的公司中持有股权,如何影响最优融资结构和社会福利。通过持股为企业融资可以提高银行在经济不景气时重组企业的风险承担激励,但由于企业在经济景气时的收益信息不对称,这样做的成本很高。我们发现,企业质量或银行资本比率的小幅提高会导致融资合同从过多的股权持有转向过多的债务融资,从而导致实质性的福利损失。因此,以限制银行过度冒险为目的的股权限制可能会矫枉过正而降低福利,而最优资本比率也必然会导致银行过度冒险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Universal Banking, Optimal Financing Structure, and Banking Regulations
We study how universal banking, that is, allowing banks to take equity positions in firms to which they lend, affects optimal financing structure and social welfare. Financing a firm through equity holding can improve a bank’s risk-taking incentive in restructuring the firm in bad times, but it is costly due to information asymmetry about the firm payoff in good times. We show a small increase in firm quality or bank capital ratio can cause the financing contract to switch from too much equity holding to too much debt financing, resulting in substantial welfare loss. Therefore, an equity holding restriction aiming at limiting banks’ excessive risk-taking may reduce welfare by overcorrecting the problem, and the optimal capital ratio may inevitably induce too much risk-taking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Did FinTech Lenders Facilitate PPP Fraud? Financial Reform and Public Good Provision: Municipal Bankruptcy Law and the Financing of Hospitals How Do Acquisitions Affect the Mental Health of Employees? Anti-Discrimination Insurance Pricing: Regulations, Fairness Criteria, and Models The Unintended Benefits of Increased Disclosure Frequency: Evidence from the Brokerage House Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1