德国社交媒体关于性别公平语言的过度讨论

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS NEUPHILOLOGISCHE MITTEILUNGEN Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.51814/nm.122738
H. Acke
{"title":"德国社交媒体关于性别公平语言的过度讨论","authors":"H. Acke","doi":"10.51814/nm.122738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender-fair language is a contested topic in contemporaryGermany. Many reports on the introduction of language changes meantto reduce discrimination result in heated debates in print, online andsocial media.In this article, I qualitatively analyse a selected debate on gender-fairlanguage on Twitter to find out how excessive the language use is andwho makes use of what kind of excessive language. The time frame ofanalysis covers a critical discourse moment in 2018 during which theCouncil for German Orthography for the first time dealt with new gen-der-fair spelling variants. Since the Council, being the only official lan-guage planning institution for German, publishes the official regulationson orthography valid in schools and administrative bodies in Germany,its decision was highly anticipated and disputed.The analysed debate contained only a few argumentative exchangeson the topic. In general, it can be said that Twitter was mostly used to takea stance, not to engage in discussions. The overall style of the debate waspolemic and exhibited many and various instances of excessive languageuse, mostly by opponents of gender-fair language. This group made useof vulgar language, pejoratives and in some cases direct insults. Theyespecially questioned their adversaries’ mental health. Only a few pro-ponents used excessive language when they insinuated a lack of mentalcapacity in their adversaries.","PeriodicalId":43379,"journal":{"name":"NEUPHILOLOGISCHE MITTEILUNGEN","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excessiveness in a German Social Media Debate on Gender-fair Language\",\"authors\":\"H. Acke\",\"doi\":\"10.51814/nm.122738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gender-fair language is a contested topic in contemporaryGermany. Many reports on the introduction of language changes meantto reduce discrimination result in heated debates in print, online andsocial media.In this article, I qualitatively analyse a selected debate on gender-fairlanguage on Twitter to find out how excessive the language use is andwho makes use of what kind of excessive language. The time frame ofanalysis covers a critical discourse moment in 2018 during which theCouncil for German Orthography for the first time dealt with new gen-der-fair spelling variants. Since the Council, being the only official lan-guage planning institution for German, publishes the official regulationson orthography valid in schools and administrative bodies in Germany,its decision was highly anticipated and disputed.The analysed debate contained only a few argumentative exchangeson the topic. In general, it can be said that Twitter was mostly used to takea stance, not to engage in discussions. The overall style of the debate waspolemic and exhibited many and various instances of excessive languageuse, mostly by opponents of gender-fair language. This group made useof vulgar language, pejoratives and in some cases direct insults. Theyespecially questioned their adversaries’ mental health. Only a few pro-ponents used excessive language when they insinuated a lack of mentalcapacity in their adversaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEUPHILOLOGISCHE MITTEILUNGEN\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEUPHILOLOGISCHE MITTEILUNGEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51814/nm.122738\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEUPHILOLOGISCHE MITTEILUNGEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51814/nm.122738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别公平的语言在当代德国是一个有争议的话题。许多关于引入旨在减少歧视的语言变化的报道在印刷,在线和社交媒体上引发了激烈的争论。在这篇文章中,我定性地分析了Twitter上关于性别公平语言的辩论,以找出语言使用过度的程度,以及谁使用了什么样的过度语言。分析的时间框架涵盖了2018年的一个关键讨论时刻,在此期间,德语正字法委员会首次处理了新的性别公平拼写变体。由于理事会是德语唯一的官方语言规划机构,出版了在德国学校和行政机构中有效的正字法官方条例,因此它的决定备受期待和争议。经过分析的辩论只包含了关于这个话题的几次辩论。总的来说,可以说Twitter主要是用来表明立场,而不是参与讨论。辩论的整体风格是争论性的,并展示了许多过度使用语言的例子,主要是反对性别公平语言的人。这群人使用粗俗的语言,贬义,在某些情况下直接侮辱。他们尤其质疑对手的心理健康状况。只有少数支持者在暗示对手缺乏心智能力时使用了过多的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Excessiveness in a German Social Media Debate on Gender-fair Language
Gender-fair language is a contested topic in contemporaryGermany. Many reports on the introduction of language changes meantto reduce discrimination result in heated debates in print, online andsocial media.In this article, I qualitatively analyse a selected debate on gender-fairlanguage on Twitter to find out how excessive the language use is andwho makes use of what kind of excessive language. The time frame ofanalysis covers a critical discourse moment in 2018 during which theCouncil for German Orthography for the first time dealt with new gen-der-fair spelling variants. Since the Council, being the only official lan-guage planning institution for German, publishes the official regulationson orthography valid in schools and administrative bodies in Germany,its decision was highly anticipated and disputed.The analysed debate contained only a few argumentative exchangeson the topic. In general, it can be said that Twitter was mostly used to takea stance, not to engage in discussions. The overall style of the debate waspolemic and exhibited many and various instances of excessive languageuse, mostly by opponents of gender-fair language. This group made useof vulgar language, pejoratives and in some cases direct insults. Theyespecially questioned their adversaries’ mental health. Only a few pro-ponents used excessive language when they insinuated a lack of mentalcapacity in their adversaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NEUPHILOLOGISCHE MITTEILUNGEN
NEUPHILOLOGISCHE MITTEILUNGEN LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Raumgeographische Verteilung von Twitter-Hashtags im deutschen Sprachraum Network Diagrams as a Means of Comparing Spelling Systems Michael Beißwenger / Lothar Lemnitzer / Carolin Müller-Spitzer (Hgg.) 2022. Forschen in der Linguistik. Eine Methodeneinführung für das Germanistik-Studium Bryant, Doreen / Zepter, Alexandra L. 2022. Performative Zugänge zu Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Ein Lehr- und Praxisbuch pronombres personales en un habla gallega
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1