单独建模亚种群对序列决策有利吗?

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 Engineering Military Operations Research Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1287/opre.2023.2474
Ilbin Lee
{"title":"单独建模亚种群对序列决策有利吗?","authors":"Ilbin Lee","doi":"10.1287/opre.2023.2474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When applying decision models, we often estimate input parameters using data. In healthcare and some other applications, data are collected from a population of different entities, such as patients. Thus, one faces a modeling question of whether to estimate different models for subpopulations (called stratifying). The potential benefit of stratifying comes from the heterogeneity of subpopulations. For example, patients who progress faster than others require a separate model and a tailored treatment plan. In “Is Separately Modeling Subpopulations Beneficial for Sequential Decision-Making?,” Lee provides theoretical results and empirical methods for deciding whether to stratify subpopulations. The article also presents how to use its results to select the best stratification among many. Improving medical decisions by tailoring to each subpopulation is a building block of precision medicine, and thus, this work aligns closely with the precision medicine paradigm.","PeriodicalId":49809,"journal":{"name":"Military Operations Research","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Separately Modeling Subpopulations Beneficial for Sequential Decision-Making?\",\"authors\":\"Ilbin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/opre.2023.2474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When applying decision models, we often estimate input parameters using data. In healthcare and some other applications, data are collected from a population of different entities, such as patients. Thus, one faces a modeling question of whether to estimate different models for subpopulations (called stratifying). The potential benefit of stratifying comes from the heterogeneity of subpopulations. For example, patients who progress faster than others require a separate model and a tailored treatment plan. In “Is Separately Modeling Subpopulations Beneficial for Sequential Decision-Making?,” Lee provides theoretical results and empirical methods for deciding whether to stratify subpopulations. The article also presents how to use its results to select the best stratification among many. Improving medical decisions by tailoring to each subpopulation is a building block of precision medicine, and thus, this work aligns closely with the precision medicine paradigm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Military Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Military Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.2474\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.2474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在应用决策模型时,我们经常使用数据来估计输入参数。在医疗保健和其他一些应用程序中,从不同的实体(如患者)收集数据。因此,人们面临着一个建模问题,即是否为亚种群估计不同的模型(称为分层)。分层的潜在好处来自于亚种群的异质性。例如,比其他人进展更快的患者需要一个单独的模型和量身定制的治疗计划。在“单独建模亚种群对顺序决策有益吗?”, Lee提供了理论结果和经验方法来决定是否对亚种群进行分层。文章还介绍了如何利用其结果在众多分层中选择最佳分层。通过对每个亚群进行定制来改进医疗决策是精准医学的一个组成部分,因此,这项工作与精准医学范式密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Separately Modeling Subpopulations Beneficial for Sequential Decision-Making?
When applying decision models, we often estimate input parameters using data. In healthcare and some other applications, data are collected from a population of different entities, such as patients. Thus, one faces a modeling question of whether to estimate different models for subpopulations (called stratifying). The potential benefit of stratifying comes from the heterogeneity of subpopulations. For example, patients who progress faster than others require a separate model and a tailored treatment plan. In “Is Separately Modeling Subpopulations Beneficial for Sequential Decision-Making?,” Lee provides theoretical results and empirical methods for deciding whether to stratify subpopulations. The article also presents how to use its results to select the best stratification among many. Improving medical decisions by tailoring to each subpopulation is a building block of precision medicine, and thus, this work aligns closely with the precision medicine paradigm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Military Operations Research
Military Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Operations Research is a peer-reviewed journal of high academic quality. The Journal publishes articles that describe operations research (OR) methodologies and theories used in key military and national security applications. Of particular interest are papers that present: Case studies showing innovative OR applications Apply OR to major policy issues Introduce interesting new problems areas Highlight education issues Document the history of military and national security OR.
期刊最新文献
Optimal Routing Under Demand Surges: The Value of Future Arrival Rates Demand Estimation Under Uncertain Consideration Sets Optimal Routing to Parallel Servers in Heavy Traffic The When and How of Delegated Search A Data-Driven Approach to Beating SAA Out of Sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1