现在和现在:两个指示副词的对比研究

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Languages in Contrast Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1075/LIC.17.1.01BOU
M. Boulin
{"title":"现在和现在:两个指示副词的对比研究","authors":"M. Boulin","doi":"10.1075/LIC.17.1.01BOU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study looks at the deictic adverbs now and 現在 ( xianzai ) and examines their respective roles in English and Chinese. Now and xianzai are commonly considered to be semantically equivalent. Their primary value is temporal: both now and xianzai refer to the time of utterance, or more generally to a temporal interval which includes the time of utterance. By examining a parallel corpus of Taiwanese and English novels, this paper aims to show that apart from this present-reference value, now and xianzai have little in common. The analysis of aligned texts reveals that: ( 1 ) now is more frequent than xianzai; ( 2 ) there is an asymmetry in the temporal use of both markers. Following Wang (2001) , I argue that now has a wider semantic range than xianzai : whereas now might be used pragmatically ( Now, why on earth did she leave at such a time? ), xianzai is limited to strict temporal reference. It appears that even in its temporal use, now is more complex than xianzai ; now is quasi-systematically contrastive, whereas xianzai tends to be purely deictic. We conclude that now is closer in function to the Chinese particle le than to the adverb xianzai .","PeriodicalId":43502,"journal":{"name":"Languages in Contrast","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Now and xianzai: A contrastive study of two deictic adverbs\",\"authors\":\"M. Boulin\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LIC.17.1.01BOU\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study looks at the deictic adverbs now and 現在 ( xianzai ) and examines their respective roles in English and Chinese. Now and xianzai are commonly considered to be semantically equivalent. Their primary value is temporal: both now and xianzai refer to the time of utterance, or more generally to a temporal interval which includes the time of utterance. By examining a parallel corpus of Taiwanese and English novels, this paper aims to show that apart from this present-reference value, now and xianzai have little in common. The analysis of aligned texts reveals that: ( 1 ) now is more frequent than xianzai; ( 2 ) there is an asymmetry in the temporal use of both markers. Following Wang (2001) , I argue that now has a wider semantic range than xianzai : whereas now might be used pragmatically ( Now, why on earth did she leave at such a time? ), xianzai is limited to strict temporal reference. It appears that even in its temporal use, now is more complex than xianzai ; now is quasi-systematically contrastive, whereas xianzai tends to be purely deictic. We conclude that now is closer in function to the Chinese particle le than to the adverb xianzai .\",\"PeriodicalId\":43502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Languages in Contrast\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Languages in Contrast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LIC.17.1.01BOU\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages in Contrast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LIC.17.1.01BOU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文以指示副词“现在”和“现在”为研究对象,考察了它们在英语和汉语中的作用。现在和现在通常被认为在语义上是等同的。它们的主要价值是时间:现在和现在都是指说话的时间,或者更一般地说,是指包括说话时间在内的时间间隔。通过对台英小说平行语料库的分析,本文旨在说明,除了“现在”和“现在”这两个词在“现在”和“现在”这两个词之间没有什么共同之处。对对齐文本的分析表明:(1)现在比现在更频繁;(2)两种标记的时间使用存在不对称性。继王(2001)之后,我认为现在比现在有更广泛的语义范围:而现在可能用于语用(现在,她到底为什么在那个时候离开?),现载仅限于严格的时间参考。看来,即使在它的时态使用上,现在也比现在更复杂;“现在”是一种近乎系统的对比,而“现在”则倾向于纯粹的指示性。我们得出结论,now在功能上更接近汉语助词le,而不是副词现在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Now and xianzai: A contrastive study of two deictic adverbs
The present study looks at the deictic adverbs now and 現在 ( xianzai ) and examines their respective roles in English and Chinese. Now and xianzai are commonly considered to be semantically equivalent. Their primary value is temporal: both now and xianzai refer to the time of utterance, or more generally to a temporal interval which includes the time of utterance. By examining a parallel corpus of Taiwanese and English novels, this paper aims to show that apart from this present-reference value, now and xianzai have little in common. The analysis of aligned texts reveals that: ( 1 ) now is more frequent than xianzai; ( 2 ) there is an asymmetry in the temporal use of both markers. Following Wang (2001) , I argue that now has a wider semantic range than xianzai : whereas now might be used pragmatically ( Now, why on earth did she leave at such a time? ), xianzai is limited to strict temporal reference. It appears that even in its temporal use, now is more complex than xianzai ; now is quasi-systematically contrastive, whereas xianzai tends to be purely deictic. We conclude that now is closer in function to the Chinese particle le than to the adverb xianzai .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Languages in Contrast
Languages in Contrast LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
40.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Languages in Contrast aims to publish contrastive studies of two or more languages. Any aspect of language may be covered, including vocabulary, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, text and discourse, stylistics, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics. Languages in Contrast welcomes interdisciplinary studies, particularly those that make links between contrastive linguistics and translation, lexicography, computational linguistics, language teaching, literary and linguistic computing, literary studies and cultural studies.
期刊最新文献
Verbs of perception and evidentiality in English/French translation Fluidic motion patterns in English and Modern Greek Straddling the divide between contrastive and translation studies Functional hybridity in translation The Gravitational Pull Hypothesis and imperfective/perfective aspect in Catalan translation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1