芬太尼或右美托咪定对超声引导肾手术患者椎旁阻滞的影响:随机对照试验

S. Ahmed, M. G. Elmawy, A. Magdy
{"title":"芬太尼或右美托咪定对超声引导肾手术患者椎旁阻滞的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"S. Ahmed, M. G. Elmawy, A. Magdy","doi":"10.4172/12155-6148.1000870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the continuous paravertebral block using either fentanyl or dexmedetomidine as an additive to bupivacaine in patients undergoing renal surgeries. Methods: Ninety adult patients presented for renal surgeries under general anesthesia and ultrasound-guided continuous paravertebral block were allocated in this study and randomly distributed into three groups. All the patients received a loading and a maintenance doses of local anesthetic mixtures composed of bupivacaine alone in Control group with addition of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine in Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine groups. The measurements included the postoperative analgesic consumption, the time for the first request for rescue analgesia, postoperative pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, and incidence of complication. Results: The addition of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine to plain bupivacaine in continuous paravertebral block significantly decreased the dose of postoperative morphine consumption from (11.33 ± 5.05 mg) to (7.33 ± 4.59 mg) (7.80 ± 4.15mg), significantly prolonged the time for first request of rescue analgesia from (6.87 ± 3.81 h) to (9.80 ± 4.50 h) (10.80 ± 5.22 h), and significantly decrease VAS score 2 h and 6 h postoperatively with insignificant difference between fentanyl and dexmedetomidine (p>0.05). Conclusion: Fentanyl or dexmedetomidine can be helpful as an adjuvant to bupivacaine (0.25%) in the continuous paravertebral block as they decreased the postoperative analgesic consumption without increased incidence of complication.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"40 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Fentanyl or Dexmedetomidine on the Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block for Patients Undergoing Renal Surgeries: Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"S. Ahmed, M. G. Elmawy, A. Magdy\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/12155-6148.1000870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the continuous paravertebral block using either fentanyl or dexmedetomidine as an additive to bupivacaine in patients undergoing renal surgeries. Methods: Ninety adult patients presented for renal surgeries under general anesthesia and ultrasound-guided continuous paravertebral block were allocated in this study and randomly distributed into three groups. All the patients received a loading and a maintenance doses of local anesthetic mixtures composed of bupivacaine alone in Control group with addition of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine in Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine groups. The measurements included the postoperative analgesic consumption, the time for the first request for rescue analgesia, postoperative pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, and incidence of complication. Results: The addition of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine to plain bupivacaine in continuous paravertebral block significantly decreased the dose of postoperative morphine consumption from (11.33 ± 5.05 mg) to (7.33 ± 4.59 mg) (7.80 ± 4.15mg), significantly prolonged the time for first request of rescue analgesia from (6.87 ± 3.81 h) to (9.80 ± 4.50 h) (10.80 ± 5.22 h), and significantly decrease VAS score 2 h and 6 h postoperatively with insignificant difference between fentanyl and dexmedetomidine (p>0.05). Conclusion: Fentanyl or dexmedetomidine can be helpful as an adjuvant to bupivacaine (0.25%) in the continuous paravertebral block as they decreased the postoperative analgesic consumption without increased incidence of complication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/12155-6148.1000870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/12155-6148.1000870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨芬太尼或右美托咪定加布比卡因连续椎旁阻滞对肾脏手术患者的影响。方法:选取90例在全麻下行肾外科手术的成人患者,超声引导下连续椎旁阻滞治疗,随机分为3组。所有患者均给予负荷剂量和维持剂量的局部麻醉混合物,对照组仅布比卡因,芬太尼组和右美托咪定组分别加用芬太尼或右美托咪定。测量包括术后镇痛药消耗、首次请求抢救镇痛的时间、术后疼痛评分、血流动力学参数和并发症发生率。结果:芬太尼或右美托咪定加布比卡因连续椎旁阻滞显著降低术后吗啡用量,从(11.33±5.05 mg)降至(7.33±4.59 mg)(7.80±4.15mg),显著延长首次请求抢救镇痛时间,从(6.87±3.81 h)降至(9.80±4.50 h)(10.80±5.22 h);术后2 h、6 h VAS评分显著降低,芬太尼与右美托咪定差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:芬太尼或右美托咪定可作为布比卡因(0.25%)的辅助剂用于连续椎旁阻滞,可减少术后镇痛药的消耗,且不增加并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Fentanyl or Dexmedetomidine on the Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block for Patients Undergoing Renal Surgeries: Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the continuous paravertebral block using either fentanyl or dexmedetomidine as an additive to bupivacaine in patients undergoing renal surgeries. Methods: Ninety adult patients presented for renal surgeries under general anesthesia and ultrasound-guided continuous paravertebral block were allocated in this study and randomly distributed into three groups. All the patients received a loading and a maintenance doses of local anesthetic mixtures composed of bupivacaine alone in Control group with addition of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine in Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine groups. The measurements included the postoperative analgesic consumption, the time for the first request for rescue analgesia, postoperative pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, and incidence of complication. Results: The addition of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine to plain bupivacaine in continuous paravertebral block significantly decreased the dose of postoperative morphine consumption from (11.33 ± 5.05 mg) to (7.33 ± 4.59 mg) (7.80 ± 4.15mg), significantly prolonged the time for first request of rescue analgesia from (6.87 ± 3.81 h) to (9.80 ± 4.50 h) (10.80 ± 5.22 h), and significantly decrease VAS score 2 h and 6 h postoperatively with insignificant difference between fentanyl and dexmedetomidine (p>0.05). Conclusion: Fentanyl or dexmedetomidine can be helpful as an adjuvant to bupivacaine (0.25%) in the continuous paravertebral block as they decreased the postoperative analgesic consumption without increased incidence of complication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Sutured on the Pulmonary Trunk and Relevant Clinical Consequences Study in a Simulated Scenario of the Influence of Training and Personality in the Resolution of Critical Situations in Anaesthesiology Residents Pulmonary Thrombosis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Theory, Evidence, and Clinical Relevance to Resource-Limited Settings Management of Cerebropontine Angle Tumors on Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Facilitating Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Retrospective Observational Study Efficacy of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block as Analgesic Modality in Clavicle Fractures: Exploring New Horizons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1