Permetrin对人体危害差异因素分析

Jun-Young Kim, Cho Su Nam
{"title":"Permetrin对人体危害差异因素分析","authors":"Jun-Young Kim, Cho Su Nam","doi":"10.36278/JEAHT.23.4.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pyrethroid insecticides are known to be relatively safe for mammals and are widely used indoors. However, the safety of pyrethroids in humans remains controversial, and there are insufficient systematic comparative analyses of studies showing conflicting results. In this study, six studies on the effect of permethrin, a representative pyrethroid, on the human body were compared, and the factors responsible for the differing results were examined. Each study was analyzed based on five criteria: experimental method, test subject, type of chemical substance used in the experiment, concentration of the chemical substance, and exposure time of the chemical substance. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of permethrin showed significant differences depending on the experimental method, test subject, type of chemical, and the cell donors used. Thus, this study could contribute to the systematic analysis of existing studies on the human hazards of pyrethroids, to generate a more balanced consensus on their safety in humans.","PeriodicalId":15758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Factors Causing Differences in the Human Hazards of Permetrin\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Young Kim, Cho Su Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.36278/JEAHT.23.4.171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pyrethroid insecticides are known to be relatively safe for mammals and are widely used indoors. However, the safety of pyrethroids in humans remains controversial, and there are insufficient systematic comparative analyses of studies showing conflicting results. In this study, six studies on the effect of permethrin, a representative pyrethroid, on the human body were compared, and the factors responsible for the differing results were examined. Each study was analyzed based on five criteria: experimental method, test subject, type of chemical substance used in the experiment, concentration of the chemical substance, and exposure time of the chemical substance. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of permethrin showed significant differences depending on the experimental method, test subject, type of chemical, and the cell donors used. Thus, this study could contribute to the systematic analysis of existing studies on the human hazards of pyrethroids, to generate a more balanced consensus on their safety in humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36278/JEAHT.23.4.171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36278/JEAHT.23.4.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已知拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂对哺乳动物相对安全,在室内被广泛使用。然而,拟除虫菊酯对人类的安全性仍然存在争议,并且没有足够的系统比较分析来显示相互矛盾的结果。本研究比较了拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂中具有代表性的氯菊酯对人体影响的六项研究,并分析了导致不同结果的因素。每项研究的分析依据五个标准:实验方法、实验对象、实验使用的化学物质类型、化学物质浓度、化学物质暴露时间。氯菊酯的细胞毒性和遗传毒性因实验方法、实验对象、化学物质类型和细胞供体的不同而有显著差异。因此,本研究有助于对拟除虫菊酯对人类危害的现有研究进行系统分析,从而就其对人类的安全性达成更为平衡的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Factors Causing Differences in the Human Hazards of Permetrin
Pyrethroid insecticides are known to be relatively safe for mammals and are widely used indoors. However, the safety of pyrethroids in humans remains controversial, and there are insufficient systematic comparative analyses of studies showing conflicting results. In this study, six studies on the effect of permethrin, a representative pyrethroid, on the human body were compared, and the factors responsible for the differing results were examined. Each study was analyzed based on five criteria: experimental method, test subject, type of chemical substance used in the experiment, concentration of the chemical substance, and exposure time of the chemical substance. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of permethrin showed significant differences depending on the experimental method, test subject, type of chemical, and the cell donors used. Thus, this study could contribute to the systematic analysis of existing studies on the human hazards of pyrethroids, to generate a more balanced consensus on their safety in humans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds Distribution in Downtown Ansan Near Industrial Complexes Global Performance, Trends, and Challenges for Assessment and Management of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): A Critical Review Examination of the Utility of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Fish Species in Han Rivr, Korea Distribution and Risk Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the South Han River Analysis and Change in Concentration of Micropollutants in Stream Affected by WWTP Effluents using Portable Composite Sampler and LC-HRMS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1