南非医疗计划支付的眼科保健服务和福利

Michael M. Willie
{"title":"南非医疗计划支付的眼科保健服务和福利","authors":"Michael M. Willie","doi":"10.4102/aveh.v82i1.756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of the efficacy with which healthcare services are covered. 8 There is a significant gap in the quality of care (between the services required by patients and those supplied by healthcare facilities and workers). Background: Vision impairment (VI) affects people worldwide, and demographic factors like age are significantly linked to VI. Routine eye exams and other eye care treatments can detect and prevent common eye illnesses. However, many lack access to these services. Aim: This study’s major objective was to analyse the distribution and funding of eye care services by medical schemes in South Africa. Setting: The study was conducted in the private sector in South Africa for benefits paid by medical schemes to optometrists, ophthalmologists and orthoptists. Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study of eye care services claim data from the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) annual reports. The review period was 2020, and scheme-level data were gathered and analysed at the aggregated rather than benefit option level. Results: In 2020, eye care benefits comprised 3.1 % of total benefits paid; this proportion remained at the same levels throughout the review period. Closed schemes spent more per beneficiary per year than open schemes for optometrists, orthoptists and ophthalmologists. Self-administered schemes had 11 % copayment for ophthalmology services, whereas outsourced schemes had less than 10 % . Conclusion: Optometrists had higher copayments than ophthalmologists and orthoptists. Medical schemes with capitated models had a lower average expenditure than other types of models, and the operating model affected expenditure; self-administered schemes spent less on optometry benefits when adjusted for beneficiaries. The study suggests reviewing eye care benefit funding models (risk vs savings), administration activities and managed care models for cost savings and health quality. Contribution: This research contributes to the discussion and implementation of universal health insurance coverage through national health insurance in South Africa. The research shows that there are not enough eye care services in the public sector and that there are different funding gaps in the private sector.","PeriodicalId":7694,"journal":{"name":"African Vision and Eye Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye care services and benefits paid by medical schemes in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Michael M. Willie\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/aveh.v82i1.756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"of the efficacy with which healthcare services are covered. 8 There is a significant gap in the quality of care (between the services required by patients and those supplied by healthcare facilities and workers). Background: Vision impairment (VI) affects people worldwide, and demographic factors like age are significantly linked to VI. Routine eye exams and other eye care treatments can detect and prevent common eye illnesses. However, many lack access to these services. Aim: This study’s major objective was to analyse the distribution and funding of eye care services by medical schemes in South Africa. Setting: The study was conducted in the private sector in South Africa for benefits paid by medical schemes to optometrists, ophthalmologists and orthoptists. Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study of eye care services claim data from the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) annual reports. The review period was 2020, and scheme-level data were gathered and analysed at the aggregated rather than benefit option level. Results: In 2020, eye care benefits comprised 3.1 % of total benefits paid; this proportion remained at the same levels throughout the review period. Closed schemes spent more per beneficiary per year than open schemes for optometrists, orthoptists and ophthalmologists. Self-administered schemes had 11 % copayment for ophthalmology services, whereas outsourced schemes had less than 10 % . Conclusion: Optometrists had higher copayments than ophthalmologists and orthoptists. Medical schemes with capitated models had a lower average expenditure than other types of models, and the operating model affected expenditure; self-administered schemes spent less on optometry benefits when adjusted for beneficiaries. The study suggests reviewing eye care benefit funding models (risk vs savings), administration activities and managed care models for cost savings and health quality. Contribution: This research contributes to the discussion and implementation of universal health insurance coverage through national health insurance in South Africa. The research shows that there are not enough eye care services in the public sector and that there are different funding gaps in the private sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Vision and Eye Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Vision and Eye Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v82i1.756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Vision and Eye Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v82i1.756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健服务的覆盖效果。8 .护理质量(在病人需要的服务与保健设施和工作人员提供的服务之间)存在很大差距。背景:视力障碍(VI)影响着全世界的人们,年龄等人口因素与VI密切相关。常规眼科检查和其他眼部护理治疗可以发现和预防常见的眼部疾病。然而,许多人无法获得这些服务。目的:本研究的主要目的是分析南非医疗计划眼科护理服务的分布和资金。背景:这项研究是在南非私营部门进行的,目的是利用医疗计划向验光师、眼科医生和矫形师支付的福利。方法:对医疗计划委员会(CMS)年度报告中的眼科保健服务索赔数据进行回顾性、纵向研究。审查期为2020年,在汇总而非福利选择一级收集和分析计划级数据。结果:2020年,眼科保健福利占支付总额的3.1%;在整个审查期间,这一比例保持在同一水平。对于验光师、矫形师和眼科医生而言,封闭计划每年每个受益人的支出高于开放计划。自行管理计划的眼科服务共付额为11%,而外包计划的这一比例不到10%。结论:验光师的共付费用高于眼科医师和骨科医师。有资本模式的医疗计划的平均支出低于其他类型的医疗计划,其运营模式影响了支出;根据受益人调整后,自我管理计划在验光福利上的支出更少。该研究建议审查眼科保健福利资助模式(风险与节省)、管理活动和管理护理模式,以节省成本和提高健康质量。贡献:本研究有助于南非通过国家健康保险讨论和实施全民健康保险。研究表明,公共部门没有足够的眼科保健服务,私营部门也存在不同的资金缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eye care services and benefits paid by medical schemes in South Africa
of the efficacy with which healthcare services are covered. 8 There is a significant gap in the quality of care (between the services required by patients and those supplied by healthcare facilities and workers). Background: Vision impairment (VI) affects people worldwide, and demographic factors like age are significantly linked to VI. Routine eye exams and other eye care treatments can detect and prevent common eye illnesses. However, many lack access to these services. Aim: This study’s major objective was to analyse the distribution and funding of eye care services by medical schemes in South Africa. Setting: The study was conducted in the private sector in South Africa for benefits paid by medical schemes to optometrists, ophthalmologists and orthoptists. Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal study of eye care services claim data from the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) annual reports. The review period was 2020, and scheme-level data were gathered and analysed at the aggregated rather than benefit option level. Results: In 2020, eye care benefits comprised 3.1 % of total benefits paid; this proportion remained at the same levels throughout the review period. Closed schemes spent more per beneficiary per year than open schemes for optometrists, orthoptists and ophthalmologists. Self-administered schemes had 11 % copayment for ophthalmology services, whereas outsourced schemes had less than 10 % . Conclusion: Optometrists had higher copayments than ophthalmologists and orthoptists. Medical schemes with capitated models had a lower average expenditure than other types of models, and the operating model affected expenditure; self-administered schemes spent less on optometry benefits when adjusted for beneficiaries. The study suggests reviewing eye care benefit funding models (risk vs savings), administration activities and managed care models for cost savings and health quality. Contribution: This research contributes to the discussion and implementation of universal health insurance coverage through national health insurance in South Africa. The research shows that there are not enough eye care services in the public sector and that there are different funding gaps in the private sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Vision and Eye Health
African Vision and Eye Health Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Optometrists’ perspectives on speciality programme development in South Africa Pathophysiology of dry eye disease and novel therapeutic agents Impact of spectacle wear on the quality of life of learners with hearing impairment in Ghana Clinical characteristics and associated factors of diabetic retinopathy in Sudanese patients Refractive error accuracy and user perceptions of a smartphone home-based tester
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1