德国蛋鸡小群舍和鸡舍的经济效益

P. Thobe, G. Haxsen
{"title":"德国蛋鸡小群舍和鸡舍的经济效益","authors":"P. Thobe, G. Haxsen","doi":"10.1399/eps.2014.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the ban on cages for laying hens, questions regarding the economic efficiency of keeping laying hens in welfare-friendly alternatives have been raised. Limited information is available on the small group system, which is new and still under debate in Germany. Therefore an analysis is necessary to evaluate costs, returns and their determinants in small group systems compared with aviaries for laying hens. The calculation of costs and returns is based on a concept proposed by the German Agricultural Society. The empirical basis is a survey of 64 flocks in northern, central and southern Germany presented by a convenient sample. In both systems the production costs per egg decrease from 13 cents to 6 cents with increasing flock size due to improved performance (laying performance, mortality rate). In small group systems the decline of the returns per egg with increasing flock size is less pronounced than the drop of the costs, so the margin of returns and costs increases. It becomes obvious that farms with larger flocks have economic advantages over farms with small flocks. In contrast to small group systems, the margin of costs and returns in aviaries declines with increasing flock size. This implies that an increase of size has more positive impacts on farms with small group systems than on farms with aviary systems. The results reflect that a good technical equipment (e.g. for climate and feeding control) and the careful observation of the animals with a “trained eye“ play an important role for the welfare of laying hens and a successful egg production.","PeriodicalId":8106,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic efficiency of small group housing and aviaries for laying hens in Germany\",\"authors\":\"P. Thobe, G. Haxsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1399/eps.2014.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the ban on cages for laying hens, questions regarding the economic efficiency of keeping laying hens in welfare-friendly alternatives have been raised. Limited information is available on the small group system, which is new and still under debate in Germany. Therefore an analysis is necessary to evaluate costs, returns and their determinants in small group systems compared with aviaries for laying hens. The calculation of costs and returns is based on a concept proposed by the German Agricultural Society. The empirical basis is a survey of 64 flocks in northern, central and southern Germany presented by a convenient sample. In both systems the production costs per egg decrease from 13 cents to 6 cents with increasing flock size due to improved performance (laying performance, mortality rate). In small group systems the decline of the returns per egg with increasing flock size is less pronounced than the drop of the costs, so the margin of returns and costs increases. It becomes obvious that farms with larger flocks have economic advantages over farms with small flocks. In contrast to small group systems, the margin of costs and returns in aviaries declines with increasing flock size. This implies that an increase of size has more positive impacts on farms with small group systems than on farms with aviary systems. The results reflect that a good technical equipment (e.g. for climate and feeding control) and the careful observation of the animals with a “trained eye“ play an important role for the welfare of laying hens and a successful egg production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2014.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2014.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在禁止饲养蛋鸡的笼子之后,有人提出了用福利友好型替代品饲养蛋鸡的经济效益问题。关于小团体制度的信息有限,这是一种新制度,在德国仍在辩论中。因此,有必要对小团体系统的成本、收益及其决定因素进行分析,并与鸡舍进行比较。成本和收益的计算是基于德国农业协会提出的一个概念。经验基础是对德国北部、中部和南部64个鸡群的调查,提供了一个方便的样本。在这两种系统中,由于性能(产蛋性能、死亡率)的提高,随着鸡群规模的增加,每个鸡蛋的生产成本从13美分下降到6美分。在小群体系统中,每枚蛋的收益随着群体规模的增加而下降的幅度不如成本的下降明显,因此收益和成本的边际增加。很明显,养大鸡群的农场比养小鸡群的农场具有经济优势。与小群体系统相比,鸟舍的成本和回报边际随着群体规模的增加而下降。这意味着规模的增加对小群体系统的农场比鸟舍系统的农场有更积极的影响。结果表明,良好的技术设备(如气候和饲养控制)和对动物的“训练有素的眼睛”的仔细观察对蛋鸡的福利和成功的产蛋量起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic efficiency of small group housing and aviaries for laying hens in Germany
After the ban on cages for laying hens, questions regarding the economic efficiency of keeping laying hens in welfare-friendly alternatives have been raised. Limited information is available on the small group system, which is new and still under debate in Germany. Therefore an analysis is necessary to evaluate costs, returns and their determinants in small group systems compared with aviaries for laying hens. The calculation of costs and returns is based on a concept proposed by the German Agricultural Society. The empirical basis is a survey of 64 flocks in northern, central and southern Germany presented by a convenient sample. In both systems the production costs per egg decrease from 13 cents to 6 cents with increasing flock size due to improved performance (laying performance, mortality rate). In small group systems the decline of the returns per egg with increasing flock size is less pronounced than the drop of the costs, so the margin of returns and costs increases. It becomes obvious that farms with larger flocks have economic advantages over farms with small flocks. In contrast to small group systems, the margin of costs and returns in aviaries declines with increasing flock size. This implies that an increase of size has more positive impacts on farms with small group systems than on farms with aviary systems. The results reflect that a good technical equipment (e.g. for climate and feeding control) and the careful observation of the animals with a “trained eye“ play an important role for the welfare of laying hens and a successful egg production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde
Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Archiv für Geflügelkunde ist die international anerkannte Fachzeitschrift mit wissenschaftlich wertvollen und erstmaligen Veröffentlichungen über Geflügelkunde und artverwandte Gebiete.
期刊最新文献
Effect of cryopreservation of individual ejaculates on fertility in genetic resource chicken lines Combined effect of short-term temperature stimulation during the hatching phase and of protein and energy concentrations in the diets on performance of laying-type cockerels of different strains Comparative analyses of layer males, dual purpose males and mixed sex broilers kept for fattening purposes regarding their floor space covering, weight-gain and several animal health traits Clostridium perfringens challenge and dietary fat type modifies performance, microbiota composition and histomorphology of the broiler chicken gastrointestinal tract Phylogenic versus selection effects on growth development, egg laying and egg quality in purebred laying hens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1