无桥zeta交直流变换器PWM与改进型单周期控制的比较

Preethy V. Warrier, P. Preetha
{"title":"无桥zeta交直流变换器PWM与改进型单周期控制的比较","authors":"Preethy V. Warrier, P. Preetha","doi":"10.1109/ICPACE.2015.7274951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bridgeless topologies have been introduced to improve the input power factor and hence reduce THD and ripples in the input current. Bridgeless zeta converter has the advantages of reduced number of semiconductor switch, easy electrical isolation and reduced in-rush current during start-up. Conventional PWM technique is used for the control of switches. But it suffers from the problem of slow dynamic response. With One Cycle Control it is possible to eliminate input perturbations in one switching cycle. In this paper, a comparison has been made between the conventional PWM technique and modified One Cycle Control for bridgeless zeta converter. The model is developed using MATLAB/Simulink and the results have been analyzed.","PeriodicalId":6644,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Power and Advanced Control Engineering (ICPACE)","volume":"2 1","pages":"244-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of PWM and modified One Cycle Control for bridgeless zeta AC-DC converter\",\"authors\":\"Preethy V. Warrier, P. Preetha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPACE.2015.7274951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bridgeless topologies have been introduced to improve the input power factor and hence reduce THD and ripples in the input current. Bridgeless zeta converter has the advantages of reduced number of semiconductor switch, easy electrical isolation and reduced in-rush current during start-up. Conventional PWM technique is used for the control of switches. But it suffers from the problem of slow dynamic response. With One Cycle Control it is possible to eliminate input perturbations in one switching cycle. In this paper, a comparison has been made between the conventional PWM technique and modified One Cycle Control for bridgeless zeta converter. The model is developed using MATLAB/Simulink and the results have been analyzed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Power and Advanced Control Engineering (ICPACE)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"244-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Power and Advanced Control Engineering (ICPACE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPACE.2015.7274951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Power and Advanced Control Engineering (ICPACE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPACE.2015.7274951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

无桥拓扑结构已被引入,以提高输入功率因数,从而减少THD和输入电流的波纹。无桥zeta变换器具有半导体开关数量少、电气隔离容易、启动时涌流小等优点。传统的PWM技术用于开关的控制。但存在动态响应慢的问题。使用单周期控制,可以在一个开关周期内消除输入扰动。本文对无桥变换器的传统PWM技术和改进的单周期控制技术进行了比较。利用MATLAB/Simulink建立了该模型,并对结果进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of PWM and modified One Cycle Control for bridgeless zeta AC-DC converter
Bridgeless topologies have been introduced to improve the input power factor and hence reduce THD and ripples in the input current. Bridgeless zeta converter has the advantages of reduced number of semiconductor switch, easy electrical isolation and reduced in-rush current during start-up. Conventional PWM technique is used for the control of switches. But it suffers from the problem of slow dynamic response. With One Cycle Control it is possible to eliminate input perturbations in one switching cycle. In this paper, a comparison has been made between the conventional PWM technique and modified One Cycle Control for bridgeless zeta converter. The model is developed using MATLAB/Simulink and the results have been analyzed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Asset management in smart grids using improved Dissolved Gas Analysis PLC based intelligent power factor correctors for industrial power systems-A case study A multiple environment dispatch problem solution using ant colony optimization for micro-grids Modeling, simulation and comparative study of new compound alloy based P-I-N solar cells - An efficient way of energy management Modeling and analysis of 6 pulse rectifier used in HVDC link
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1