关于语言多中心性的思考

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1515/soci-2021-0003
P. Auer
{"title":"关于语言多中心性的思考","authors":"P. Auer","doi":"10.1515/soci-2021-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article argues that the notion of pluricentricity fails to capture the multitude of sociolinguistic contexts in which a language may have two or more standards, which is due to the fact that it was invented with a particular context in mind (that of emerging nation-states). The notion also suffers from a reliance on an undefined and unclear (perhaps metaphorical) notion of a centre (and a periphery). A more neutral term such as multi-standard language therefore appears more useful. It is also argued that pluriareality is not a notion that can fruitfully replace pluricentricity, as the two presuppose different approaches to standardisation: one usage-based, the other normative. This is demonstrated with reference to the on-going discussion of the Austrian variety of German.","PeriodicalId":55923,"journal":{"name":"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana","volume":"13 1","pages":"29 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on linguistic pluricentricity\",\"authors\":\"P. Auer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/soci-2021-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article argues that the notion of pluricentricity fails to capture the multitude of sociolinguistic contexts in which a language may have two or more standards, which is due to the fact that it was invented with a particular context in mind (that of emerging nation-states). The notion also suffers from a reliance on an undefined and unclear (perhaps metaphorical) notion of a centre (and a periphery). A more neutral term such as multi-standard language therefore appears more useful. It is also argued that pluriareality is not a notion that can fruitfully replace pluricentricity, as the two presuppose different approaches to standardisation: one usage-based, the other normative. This is demonstrated with reference to the on-going discussion of the Austrian variety of German.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2021-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2021-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,多中心性的概念未能捕捉到众多的社会语言学语境,在这些语境中,一种语言可能有两个或更多的标准,这是由于它是在特定的语境(新兴民族国家的语境)下被发明的。这个概念还依赖于一个未定义和不明确的(可能是隐喻的)中心(和外围)概念。因此,一个更中性的术语,如多标准语言,似乎更有用。还有人认为,多元现实并不能有效地取代多中心性,因为这两种概念预设了不同的标准化方法:一种是基于使用的,另一种是规范的。这可以从正在进行的关于奥地利德语变体的讨论中得到证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflections on linguistic pluricentricity
Abstract This article argues that the notion of pluricentricity fails to capture the multitude of sociolinguistic contexts in which a language may have two or more standards, which is due to the fact that it was invented with a particular context in mind (that of emerging nation-states). The notion also suffers from a reliance on an undefined and unclear (perhaps metaphorical) notion of a centre (and a periphery). A more neutral term such as multi-standard language therefore appears more useful. It is also argued that pluriareality is not a notion that can fruitfully replace pluricentricity, as the two presuppose different approaches to standardisation: one usage-based, the other normative. This is demonstrated with reference to the on-going discussion of the Austrian variety of German.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pradilla Cardona, Miquel Àngel (ed. 2022): Catalan sociolinguistics: State of the art and future challenges (IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 32). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 333 p. Devilla, Lorenzo and Galiñanes Gallén, Marta (eds.) (2021): Lingue minori e turismo. Aspetti linguistici, sociolinguistici e territoriali [Minority languages and tourism. Linguistic, sociolinguistic and territorial aspects]. Cagliari: Arkadia. 128 p. Negative structures in neo-standard Italian: non è che (‘it is not that’) + S and mica (‘a crumb’) in comparison D’Agostino, Mari (2021): Noi che siamo passati dalla Libia. Giovani in viaggio fra alfabeti e multilinguismo [We who have passed from Libya. Young people traveling between alphabets and multilingualism]. Bologna: Il Mulino. 248 p. Lexical coherence in contemporary Italian: a lectometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1