喝还是倒:运动员应该如何用水降温?

N. Morris, O. Jay
{"title":"喝还是倒:运动员应该如何用水降温?","authors":"N. Morris, O. Jay","doi":"10.1080/23328940.2016.1185206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It’s almost that time again. With the 2016 summer Olympics in Rio just around the corner, the season of dreams is upon us. It’s the time when we watch seemingly real life super heroes push themselves to the limit, while bringing back early memories of when we wanted to be those athletes on TV that children look up to. At the Rio games, not only will these super humans compete against each other, they must also contend with the hot and balmy conditions. Some of us, during sporting activities, may be familiar with battling against our own minds and dealing with the oppressive force of the heat, when we would happily accept any measure that alleviates the discomfort of our exertions. With respect to endurance sports in the heat, this relief can come with sipping cool water, spraying our face with a cool mist, or wrapping an ice towel around our necks. The cover photo of this edition of Temperature illustrates a scenario of two elite triathletes, Andrea Hewitt (on the left) and Rachel Klamer (on the right), dousing themselves with water from their bottles in order to cope with both the internal heat they are producing through muscular contractions, and the external heat from the surrounding environment. We sometimes see athletes self-dousing with water, or have done it ourselves, in order to attain an immediate relief from the heat rather than taking the time to drink. But is this a smart move? Shouldn’t we just drink the water instead, or even better – drink iced water? To answer this question, we must consider how much heat we can lose to water in its various forms. The most straightforward way is to do so via conduction following the ingestion of cold water. The amount of heat lost is determined by the temperature difference between the ingested water and the body core, the volume of water drunk, and the specific heat capacity of water, i.e. the amount of heat energy needed to warm up 1 g of water by 1 C, which is 4.184 J/g/ C. We can dramatically increase the amount of heat lost to water by adding ice into the mix, as the amount of heat required to melt ice, known as the latent heat of fusion, is much greater than the specific heat capacity of water at 334 J/g. It is this much greater potential for heat loss that has led to the recent trend of athletes consuming ice slurry drinks, a mixture of shredded ice and water, before or during their athletic activities. Despite this improved potential for heat dissipation, melting ice is still a far cry from the amount of heat we can lose through the evaporation of water, as just one gram of evaporated water results in the liberation of a massive 2430 J of latent heat energy. To put these different cooling strategies into context, we can directly compare heat loss potential with a fixed volume of water (Fig. 1). Assuming a core body temperature of 38 C, drinking one glass (250 ml) of 1 C water would result in a net heat loss of 39 kJ. Whereas if the contents of that glass were changed to half-water and halfice, the potential for heat loss would more than double to 81 kJ. However, if we could somehow spread that 250 ml of water across our skin surface so that it all evaporated, the resultant heat loss would be a whopping 607 kJ. One caveat is that, while it is relatively easy to ingest water without spilling it, ensuring 250 ml of water is distributed across the skin in a way that it all evaporates is much more difficult. However, it is important to keep in mind that if just 15% of that water evaporates from the skin, the heat loss would still be greater than ingesting the entire 250 ml ice slurry. Another consideration is that the exercise modality and environment in which we perform exercise may alter the effectiveness of dousing ourselves with water, based on how likely the water is to evaporate. For example, dry air and high wind speeds greatly favor evaporation, so cycling in the desert may be an ideal situation for selfdousing with water, as most of it is likely to evaporate. Conversely, high levels of ambient humidity and low air","PeriodicalId":22565,"journal":{"name":"Temperature: Multidisciplinary Biomedical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To drink or to pour: How should athletes use water to cool themselves?\",\"authors\":\"N. Morris, O. Jay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23328940.2016.1185206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It’s almost that time again. With the 2016 summer Olympics in Rio just around the corner, the season of dreams is upon us. It’s the time when we watch seemingly real life super heroes push themselves to the limit, while bringing back early memories of when we wanted to be those athletes on TV that children look up to. At the Rio games, not only will these super humans compete against each other, they must also contend with the hot and balmy conditions. Some of us, during sporting activities, may be familiar with battling against our own minds and dealing with the oppressive force of the heat, when we would happily accept any measure that alleviates the discomfort of our exertions. With respect to endurance sports in the heat, this relief can come with sipping cool water, spraying our face with a cool mist, or wrapping an ice towel around our necks. The cover photo of this edition of Temperature illustrates a scenario of two elite triathletes, Andrea Hewitt (on the left) and Rachel Klamer (on the right), dousing themselves with water from their bottles in order to cope with both the internal heat they are producing through muscular contractions, and the external heat from the surrounding environment. We sometimes see athletes self-dousing with water, or have done it ourselves, in order to attain an immediate relief from the heat rather than taking the time to drink. But is this a smart move? Shouldn’t we just drink the water instead, or even better – drink iced water? To answer this question, we must consider how much heat we can lose to water in its various forms. The most straightforward way is to do so via conduction following the ingestion of cold water. The amount of heat lost is determined by the temperature difference between the ingested water and the body core, the volume of water drunk, and the specific heat capacity of water, i.e. the amount of heat energy needed to warm up 1 g of water by 1 C, which is 4.184 J/g/ C. We can dramatically increase the amount of heat lost to water by adding ice into the mix, as the amount of heat required to melt ice, known as the latent heat of fusion, is much greater than the specific heat capacity of water at 334 J/g. It is this much greater potential for heat loss that has led to the recent trend of athletes consuming ice slurry drinks, a mixture of shredded ice and water, before or during their athletic activities. Despite this improved potential for heat dissipation, melting ice is still a far cry from the amount of heat we can lose through the evaporation of water, as just one gram of evaporated water results in the liberation of a massive 2430 J of latent heat energy. To put these different cooling strategies into context, we can directly compare heat loss potential with a fixed volume of water (Fig. 1). Assuming a core body temperature of 38 C, drinking one glass (250 ml) of 1 C water would result in a net heat loss of 39 kJ. Whereas if the contents of that glass were changed to half-water and halfice, the potential for heat loss would more than double to 81 kJ. However, if we could somehow spread that 250 ml of water across our skin surface so that it all evaporated, the resultant heat loss would be a whopping 607 kJ. One caveat is that, while it is relatively easy to ingest water without spilling it, ensuring 250 ml of water is distributed across the skin in a way that it all evaporates is much more difficult. However, it is important to keep in mind that if just 15% of that water evaporates from the skin, the heat loss would still be greater than ingesting the entire 250 ml ice slurry. Another consideration is that the exercise modality and environment in which we perform exercise may alter the effectiveness of dousing ourselves with water, based on how likely the water is to evaporate. For example, dry air and high wind speeds greatly favor evaporation, so cycling in the desert may be an ideal situation for selfdousing with water, as most of it is likely to evaporate. Conversely, high levels of ambient humidity and low air\",\"PeriodicalId\":22565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Temperature: Multidisciplinary Biomedical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Temperature: Multidisciplinary Biomedical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2016.1185206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temperature: Multidisciplinary Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2016.1185206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

又快到那个时候了。随着2016年里约夏季奥运会的临近,我们迎来了梦想的季节。在这段时间里,我们看着看似真实的超级英雄把自己推向极限,同时回想起我们想成为孩子们崇拜的电视上的运动员的早期记忆。在里约奥运会上,这些超级人类不仅要相互竞争,还必须与炎热和温暖的环境作斗争。在体育活动中,我们中的一些人可能熟悉与自己的思想作斗争和应对高温的压迫力,当我们高兴地接受任何减轻我们努力时的不适的措施时。在炎热的天气里进行耐力运动,可以喝点凉水,在脸上喷点凉雾,或者在脖子上围一条冰巾。这期《温度》杂志的封面照片描绘了两名优秀的铁人三项运动员安德里亚·休伊特(左)和雷切尔·克莱默(右)的场景,他们从瓶子里拿水浸泡自己,以应对肌肉收缩产生的内部热量和周围环境产生的外部热量。我们有时会看到运动员自己用水洗澡,或者自己用水洗澡,目的是为了立即解暑,而不是花时间喝水。但这是明智之举吗?难道我们不应该直接喝水,或者更好的办法是——喝冰水吗?要回答这个问题,我们必须考虑有多少热量散失给各种形式的水。最直接的方法是在摄入冷水后通过传导。失去的热量是由摄入水和身体之间的温差核心,水的体积醉了,和水的比热容,即所需的热能加热1克水1 C,它是4.184 J / g / C .我们可以显著增加的热量损失向混合,水通过添加冰融化冰所需的热量,称为熔化潜热,比水的334 J/g比热容大得多。正是这种更大的热量流失的可能性,导致了最近运动员在运动前或运动期间喝冰浆饮料的趋势,冰浆饮料是一种碎冰和水的混合物。尽管在散热方面有了很大的提高,但冰的融化与水的蒸发所能损失的热量相比仍然相去甚远,因为仅仅一克蒸发的水就能释放出2430焦的巨大潜热能量。为了将这些不同的冷却策略置于背景中,我们可以直接比较固定体积的水的热损失潜力(图1)。假设核心体温为38℃,饮用一杯(250毫升)1℃的水将导致39千焦的净热损失。然而,如果杯子的内容物变成一半水一半冰,潜在的热损失将增加一倍以上,达到81千焦。然而,如果我们能把这250毫升的水扩散到皮肤表面,让它全部蒸发掉,最终的热量损失将达到惊人的607千焦。需要注意的是,虽然摄入水分而不洒出来相对容易,但要确保250毫升的水分布在皮肤上,使其全部蒸发就困难得多。然而,重要的是要记住,即使只有15%的水从皮肤上蒸发掉,热量损失仍然比摄入整个250毫升冰浆要大。另一个需要考虑的问题是,根据水蒸发的可能性,我们进行运动的方式和环境可能会改变用水浸泡的效果。例如,干燥的空气和高风速极大地促进了蒸发,因此在沙漠中骑行可能是用水自浇的理想情况,因为大部分水很可能蒸发掉。相反,高水平的环境湿度和低空气
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To drink or to pour: How should athletes use water to cool themselves?
It’s almost that time again. With the 2016 summer Olympics in Rio just around the corner, the season of dreams is upon us. It’s the time when we watch seemingly real life super heroes push themselves to the limit, while bringing back early memories of when we wanted to be those athletes on TV that children look up to. At the Rio games, not only will these super humans compete against each other, they must also contend with the hot and balmy conditions. Some of us, during sporting activities, may be familiar with battling against our own minds and dealing with the oppressive force of the heat, when we would happily accept any measure that alleviates the discomfort of our exertions. With respect to endurance sports in the heat, this relief can come with sipping cool water, spraying our face with a cool mist, or wrapping an ice towel around our necks. The cover photo of this edition of Temperature illustrates a scenario of two elite triathletes, Andrea Hewitt (on the left) and Rachel Klamer (on the right), dousing themselves with water from their bottles in order to cope with both the internal heat they are producing through muscular contractions, and the external heat from the surrounding environment. We sometimes see athletes self-dousing with water, or have done it ourselves, in order to attain an immediate relief from the heat rather than taking the time to drink. But is this a smart move? Shouldn’t we just drink the water instead, or even better – drink iced water? To answer this question, we must consider how much heat we can lose to water in its various forms. The most straightforward way is to do so via conduction following the ingestion of cold water. The amount of heat lost is determined by the temperature difference between the ingested water and the body core, the volume of water drunk, and the specific heat capacity of water, i.e. the amount of heat energy needed to warm up 1 g of water by 1 C, which is 4.184 J/g/ C. We can dramatically increase the amount of heat lost to water by adding ice into the mix, as the amount of heat required to melt ice, known as the latent heat of fusion, is much greater than the specific heat capacity of water at 334 J/g. It is this much greater potential for heat loss that has led to the recent trend of athletes consuming ice slurry drinks, a mixture of shredded ice and water, before or during their athletic activities. Despite this improved potential for heat dissipation, melting ice is still a far cry from the amount of heat we can lose through the evaporation of water, as just one gram of evaporated water results in the liberation of a massive 2430 J of latent heat energy. To put these different cooling strategies into context, we can directly compare heat loss potential with a fixed volume of water (Fig. 1). Assuming a core body temperature of 38 C, drinking one glass (250 ml) of 1 C water would result in a net heat loss of 39 kJ. Whereas if the contents of that glass were changed to half-water and halfice, the potential for heat loss would more than double to 81 kJ. However, if we could somehow spread that 250 ml of water across our skin surface so that it all evaporated, the resultant heat loss would be a whopping 607 kJ. One caveat is that, while it is relatively easy to ingest water without spilling it, ensuring 250 ml of water is distributed across the skin in a way that it all evaporates is much more difficult. However, it is important to keep in mind that if just 15% of that water evaporates from the skin, the heat loss would still be greater than ingesting the entire 250 ml ice slurry. Another consideration is that the exercise modality and environment in which we perform exercise may alter the effectiveness of dousing ourselves with water, based on how likely the water is to evaporate. For example, dry air and high wind speeds greatly favor evaporation, so cycling in the desert may be an ideal situation for selfdousing with water, as most of it is likely to evaporate. Conversely, high levels of ambient humidity and low air
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The multifaceted benefits of passive heat therapies for extending the healthspan: A comprehensive review with a focus on Finnish sauna Thermoregulation in mice: The road to understanding torpor hypothermia and the shortcomings of a circuit for generating fever Advances in thermal physiology of diving marine mammals: The dual role of peripheral perfusion. Cooling vests alleviate perceptual heat strain perceived by COVID-19 nurses Physiology of sweat gland function: The roles of sweating and sweat composition in human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1