课程中的语言:一个悖论及其改变的潜力。

IF 0.1 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH English in Australia Pub Date : 1976-06-01 DOI:10.1080/0013191760280305
Nancy Martin
{"title":"课程中的语言:一个悖论及其改变的潜力。","authors":"Nancy Martin","doi":"10.1080/0013191760280305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper gives some account of the outcomes of the Schools Council project Writing across the Curriculum 11‐16, but is primarily concerned with theoretical problems of the relationships between teaching, research and development in language. One of the most far‐reaching changes envisaged by the Bullock Committee is to be found in its recommendation that all teachers should take responsibility for the language development of their students not only in their specialist areas but, in conjunction with other teachers, for language policies across the whole curriculum. Yet to arrive at a policy for language means asking fundamental questions about learning, and teaching, and this can only be done by the various subject specialists who do not generally regard themselves as concerned with language.","PeriodicalId":44311,"journal":{"name":"English in Australia","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"1976-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language Across the Curriculum: A Paradox and its Potential for Change.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013191760280305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper gives some account of the outcomes of the Schools Council project Writing across the Curriculum 11‐16, but is primarily concerned with theoretical problems of the relationships between teaching, research and development in language. One of the most far‐reaching changes envisaged by the Bullock Committee is to be found in its recommendation that all teachers should take responsibility for the language development of their students not only in their specialist areas but, in conjunction with other teachers, for language policies across the whole curriculum. Yet to arrive at a policy for language means asking fundamental questions about learning, and teaching, and this can only be done by the various subject specialists who do not generally regard themselves as concerned with language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English in Australia\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English in Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191760280305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English in Australia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191760280305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文介绍了学校理事会项目《跨课程写作》11 - 16的成果,但主要关注的是语言教学、研究和发展之间关系的理论问题。布洛克委员会提出的一项影响最深远的改革建议是,所有教师都应该为学生的语言发展负责,不仅是在他们的专业领域,而且要与其他教师一起,为整个课程的语言政策负责。然而,要制定一项语言政策,就意味着要提出有关学习和教学的基本问题,而这只能由各个学科的专家来完成,而这些专家通常不认为自己与语言有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Language Across the Curriculum: A Paradox and its Potential for Change.
Abstract This paper gives some account of the outcomes of the Schools Council project Writing across the Curriculum 11‐16, but is primarily concerned with theoretical problems of the relationships between teaching, research and development in language. One of the most far‐reaching changes envisaged by the Bullock Committee is to be found in its recommendation that all teachers should take responsibility for the language development of their students not only in their specialist areas but, in conjunction with other teachers, for language policies across the whole curriculum. Yet to arrive at a policy for language means asking fundamental questions about learning, and teaching, and this can only be done by the various subject specialists who do not generally regard themselves as concerned with language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
English in Australia
English in Australia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
A Border-Crossing Pedagogy to Disrupt LGBTIQ+ Bullying and Violence in Schools. The language of connection Agitations and Animations Web Site Reviews Writing the City.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1