{"title":"国际烟草协定争端解决机构在加强国家在烟草控制领域的主权方面的作用","authors":"L. Gruszczynski","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3669044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter critically analyses the role that is played by international economic law (IEL) dispute settlement bodies (DSBs) in the field of tobacco control. In particular, it looks at the recent case law of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and ad hoc investment tribunals that dealt with the national tobacco control measures. The chapter seeks to demonstrate that IEL DSBs recognize the importance of public health policies relating to tobacco control, and that through their recent decisions, they actually broadened, rather than undermined, the regulatory space available to States. If a specific measure is found illegal in the course of the proceedings, this is due to its discriminatory design and not because of any specific IEL hierarchy of values (e.g. trade and investment protection above public health).","PeriodicalId":14394,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of IEL Dispute Settlement Bodies in Reinforcing the Sovereign Rights of States in the Field of Tobacco Control\",\"authors\":\"L. Gruszczynski\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3669044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter critically analyses the role that is played by international economic law (IEL) dispute settlement bodies (DSBs) in the field of tobacco control. In particular, it looks at the recent case law of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and ad hoc investment tribunals that dealt with the national tobacco control measures. The chapter seeks to demonstrate that IEL DSBs recognize the importance of public health policies relating to tobacco control, and that through their recent decisions, they actually broadened, rather than undermined, the regulatory space available to States. If a specific measure is found illegal in the course of the proceedings, this is due to its discriminatory design and not because of any specific IEL hierarchy of values (e.g. trade and investment protection above public health).\",\"PeriodicalId\":14394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3669044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Trade Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3669044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Role of IEL Dispute Settlement Bodies in Reinforcing the Sovereign Rights of States in the Field of Tobacco Control
This chapter critically analyses the role that is played by international economic law (IEL) dispute settlement bodies (DSBs) in the field of tobacco control. In particular, it looks at the recent case law of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and ad hoc investment tribunals that dealt with the national tobacco control measures. The chapter seeks to demonstrate that IEL DSBs recognize the importance of public health policies relating to tobacco control, and that through their recent decisions, they actually broadened, rather than undermined, the regulatory space available to States. If a specific measure is found illegal in the course of the proceedings, this is due to its discriminatory design and not because of any specific IEL hierarchy of values (e.g. trade and investment protection above public health).