台湾强直性脊柱炎患者开始生物治疗的治疗模式与费用?apopulation-based分析

Ko-Jen Li, C. Tang, W. Furnback, Masayo Sato, Ching-Yun Wei, Bruce Cm Wang Chia-Fang Lee
{"title":"台湾强直性脊柱炎患者开始生物治疗的治疗模式与费用?apopulation-based分析","authors":"Ko-Jen Li, C. Tang, W. Furnback, Masayo Sato, Ching-Yun Wei, Bruce Cm Wang Chia-Fang Lee","doi":"10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(5).161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the real-world treatment patterns and costs of patients initiating their first biologic therapy for the treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) in Taiwan. Methods: Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims data between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2017 was used to identify and follow patients with AS initiating their first biologic therapy in 2015. Patients > 18 years of age, with AS (ICD-9-CM: 720.0), a claim for a biologic therapy in 2015, continuous enrollment for at least one year following index, and no claims for biologics in the previous year were indexed into the study. A matched cohort of non-biologic patients with AS receiving antiinflammatory drugs was derived. Patients were followed from their index date (first biologic claim) through the end of the study period, death, or they were lost to follow-up. Results: There were 430 as patients included in the biologic-initiators cohort (Adalimumab = 191; Etanercept = 122; Golimumab = 177). PRE-index utilization rates were significantly higher for biologic-initiators compared to the matched cohort for corticosteroids, opioids, and csDMARDs (all p<0.0001). utilization rates of NSAIDs and csDMARDs were lower for biologic initiators and higher for the matched cohort during the follow-up period compared to the pre-index period. mean total healthcare costs were higher and average non-medication costs were lower for biologic-initiators compared to the matched cohort during the two years post-index. Conclusions: Patients initiating their first biologic therapy for as had high rates of as-related medication utilization during the pre-index period followed by a decrease in utilization rates after biologic initiation.","PeriodicalId":13740,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment patterns and costs ofpatients with ankylosing spondylitisinitiating biologic therapy in taiwan ??? apopulation-based analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ko-Jen Li, C. Tang, W. Furnback, Masayo Sato, Ching-Yun Wei, Bruce Cm Wang Chia-Fang Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(5).161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the real-world treatment patterns and costs of patients initiating their first biologic therapy for the treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) in Taiwan. Methods: Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims data between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2017 was used to identify and follow patients with AS initiating their first biologic therapy in 2015. Patients > 18 years of age, with AS (ICD-9-CM: 720.0), a claim for a biologic therapy in 2015, continuous enrollment for at least one year following index, and no claims for biologics in the previous year were indexed into the study. A matched cohort of non-biologic patients with AS receiving antiinflammatory drugs was derived. Patients were followed from their index date (first biologic claim) through the end of the study period, death, or they were lost to follow-up. Results: There were 430 as patients included in the biologic-initiators cohort (Adalimumab = 191; Etanercept = 122; Golimumab = 177). PRE-index utilization rates were significantly higher for biologic-initiators compared to the matched cohort for corticosteroids, opioids, and csDMARDs (all p<0.0001). utilization rates of NSAIDs and csDMARDs were lower for biologic initiators and higher for the matched cohort during the follow-up period compared to the pre-index period. mean total healthcare costs were higher and average non-medication costs were lower for biologic-initiators compared to the matched cohort during the two years post-index. Conclusions: Patients initiating their first biologic therapy for as had high rates of as-related medication utilization during the pre-index period followed by a decrease in utilization rates after biologic initiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(5).161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(5).161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估台湾强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者首次生物治疗的实际治疗模式和费用。方法:使用台湾2014年1月1日至2017年12月31日的国民健康保险索赔数据,识别并跟踪2015年开始首次生物治疗的AS患者。患者> 18岁,AS (ICD-9-CM: 720.0), 2015年索赔生物治疗,连续入组至少一年,前一年没有生物药物索赔被纳入研究。一组接受抗炎药物治疗的非生物性AS患者进行了配对。患者从他们的索引日期(第一次生物学声明)开始随访,直到研究期结束、死亡或失去随访。结果:430例患者被纳入生物启动队列(阿达木单抗= 191例;依那西普= 122;Golimumab = 177)。与匹配的队列相比,生物启动剂的指数前使用率显著高于皮质类固醇、阿片类药物和csDMARDs(均p<0.0001)。在随访期间,非甾体抗炎药和csdmard的生物启动率较低,而匹配队列的使用率较高。与匹配的队列相比,在索引后的两年内,生物启动者的平均总医疗费用较高,平均非药物费用较低。结论:首次接受as生物治疗的患者在术前有较高的as相关药物使用率,而在开始生物治疗后使用率下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment patterns and costs ofpatients with ankylosing spondylitisinitiating biologic therapy in taiwan ??? apopulation-based analysis
Objective: To evaluate the real-world treatment patterns and costs of patients initiating their first biologic therapy for the treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) in Taiwan. Methods: Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims data between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2017 was used to identify and follow patients with AS initiating their first biologic therapy in 2015. Patients > 18 years of age, with AS (ICD-9-CM: 720.0), a claim for a biologic therapy in 2015, continuous enrollment for at least one year following index, and no claims for biologics in the previous year were indexed into the study. A matched cohort of non-biologic patients with AS receiving antiinflammatory drugs was derived. Patients were followed from their index date (first biologic claim) through the end of the study period, death, or they were lost to follow-up. Results: There were 430 as patients included in the biologic-initiators cohort (Adalimumab = 191; Etanercept = 122; Golimumab = 177). PRE-index utilization rates were significantly higher for biologic-initiators compared to the matched cohort for corticosteroids, opioids, and csDMARDs (all p<0.0001). utilization rates of NSAIDs and csDMARDs were lower for biologic initiators and higher for the matched cohort during the follow-up period compared to the pre-index period. mean total healthcare costs were higher and average non-medication costs were lower for biologic-initiators compared to the matched cohort during the two years post-index. Conclusions: Patients initiating their first biologic therapy for as had high rates of as-related medication utilization during the pre-index period followed by a decrease in utilization rates after biologic initiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe coronal re-infection and issuesof mechanisms, monitoring and therapy Treatment patterns and costs ofpatients with ankylosing spondylitisinitiating biologic therapy in taiwan ??? apopulation-based analysis Effectiveness of adalimumab versus infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized double blinded clinical trial Synovitis with pitting edema as the presenting manifestation of antisynthetase syndrome Demographic, clinical, and serological features of Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of 470 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1