在法律之外生活，你必须诚实

Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1093/arisup/akab007

S. Chappell

{"title":"在法律之外生活，你必须诚实","authors":"S. Chappell","doi":"10.1093/arisup/akab007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Section I states Sandis’s view in his paper (particularism for actions, generalism for dispositions); Section II describes and begins to criticize Dancy-style particularism; Section III applies these criticisms to Sandis’s view; Section IV delineates an alternative view (my own) about actions, dispositions, and the particularism/generalism debate; Section V raises and considers a further puzzle, about how in general we should understand virtue ascriptions anyway.","PeriodicalId":100121,"journal":{"name":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Live Outside the Law You Must Be Honest\",\"authors\":\"S. Chappell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arisup/akab007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Section I states Sandis’s view in his paper (particularism for actions, generalism for dispositions); Section II describes and begins to criticize Dancy-style particularism; Section III applies these criticisms to Sandis’s view; Section IV delineates an alternative view (my own) about actions, dispositions, and the particularism/generalism debate; Section V raises and considers a further puzzle, about how in general we should understand virtue ascriptions anyway.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akab007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akab007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

第一节阐述了Sandis在他的论文中的观点(行为的特殊论，性格的一般论);第二节描述并开始批判舞蹈风格的特殊主义;第三部分将这些批评应用于桑迪斯的观点;第四节描述了另一种观点(我自己的)关于行动、性格和特殊主义/普遍主义辩论;第五部分提出并思考了一个更深层次的难题，即我们应该如何理解美德的归属。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

To Live Outside the Law You Must Be Honest

Section I states Sandis’s view in his paper (particularism for actions, generalism for dispositions); Section II describes and begins to criticize Dancy-style particularism; Section III applies these criticisms to Sandis’s view; Section IV delineates an alternative view (my own) about actions, dispositions, and the particularism/generalism debate; Section V raises and considers a further puzzle, about how in general we should understand virtue ascriptions anyway.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Pluralist Republicanism: Race, Gender and Domination Horkheimer, Habermas, Foucault as Political Epistemologists Metaethics and the Nature of Properties Liberation Philosophy Logical Consequence (Slight Return)