一种独立于MRI扫描仪的射频剂量计,用于估计人体躯干幻影的射频功率沉积

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering Pub Date : 2017-05-29 DOI:10.1002/cmr.b.21351
Youngseob Seo
{"title":"一种独立于MRI扫描仪的射频剂量计,用于估计人体躯干幻影的射频功率沉积","authors":"Youngseob Seo","doi":"10.1002/cmr.b.21351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>An assessment of radiofrequency (RF) power deposition independent of the information provided by MRI scanners is thus desirable. We developed a novel scanner-independent RF dosimeter based on measurements of the resistance of a thermistor that dissipates the RF power during scanning. With the RF dosimeter, the RF power deposition for four MRI sequences with specific absorption rate (SAR) values (0.1-3.3 W/kg) was measured on five different scanners and the correlation between the RF dosimeter reading and the SAR levels calculated by the scanners was investigated. The novel RF dosimeter showed a linear relationship between the RF power deposition and the scanner-reported whole-body averaged SAR for each scanner. However, there was a variability in the reading among different scanners. The RF dosimeter readings were 9.7 and 9.5 mW on GE 1.5 T (SAR=2.6 W/kg), 3.6 and 3.7 mW on Philips 1.5 T (SAR=3.3 W/kg), 9.5 and 8.6 mW on Siemens 3 T (SAR=3.0 W/kg), and 4.7 and 3.9 mW on Philips 3 T (SAR=2.6 W/kg), respectively. The scanner-independent RF dosimeter developed in this study can play a significant role in checking the accuracy of scanners’ SAR values as a standardized method for measuring the RF power deposition for MR safety.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50623,"journal":{"name":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","volume":"47B 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cmr.b.21351","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An MRI scanner-independent radiofrequency dosimeter for the estimation of RF power deposition with a human torso phantom\",\"authors\":\"Youngseob Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cmr.b.21351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>An assessment of radiofrequency (RF) power deposition independent of the information provided by MRI scanners is thus desirable. We developed a novel scanner-independent RF dosimeter based on measurements of the resistance of a thermistor that dissipates the RF power during scanning. With the RF dosimeter, the RF power deposition for four MRI sequences with specific absorption rate (SAR) values (0.1-3.3 W/kg) was measured on five different scanners and the correlation between the RF dosimeter reading and the SAR levels calculated by the scanners was investigated. The novel RF dosimeter showed a linear relationship between the RF power deposition and the scanner-reported whole-body averaged SAR for each scanner. However, there was a variability in the reading among different scanners. The RF dosimeter readings were 9.7 and 9.5 mW on GE 1.5 T (SAR=2.6 W/kg), 3.6 and 3.7 mW on Philips 1.5 T (SAR=3.3 W/kg), 9.5 and 8.6 mW on Siemens 3 T (SAR=3.0 W/kg), and 4.7 and 3.9 mW on Philips 3 T (SAR=2.6 W/kg), respectively. The scanner-independent RF dosimeter developed in this study can play a significant role in checking the accuracy of scanners’ SAR values as a standardized method for measuring the RF power deposition for MR safety.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering\",\"volume\":\"47B 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cmr.b.21351\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cmr.b.21351\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cmr.b.21351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

因此,需要独立于MRI扫描仪提供的信息对射频(RF)功率沉积进行评估。我们开发了一种新的扫描器独立的射频剂量计基于测量热敏电阻的电阻,在扫描过程中耗散射频功率。利用射频剂量计,在5种不同的扫描仪上测量了4个比吸收率(SAR)值(0.1 ~ 3.3 W/kg)的MRI序列的射频功率沉积,并研究了射频剂量计读数与扫描仪计算的SAR水平之间的相关性。新型射频剂量计显示,射频功率沉积与扫描仪报告的每台扫描仪的全身平均SAR之间存在线性关系。然而,在不同的扫描仪中,读数存在差异。射频剂量计的读数在GE 1.5 T上分别为9.7和9.5 mW (SAR=2.6 W/kg), Philips 1.5 T上分别为3.6和3.7 mW (SAR=3.3 W/kg), Siemens 3t上分别为9.5和8.6 mW (SAR=3.0 W/kg), Philips 3t上分别为4.7和3.9 mW (SAR=2.6 W/kg)。本研究开发的与扫描仪无关的射频剂量计作为一种测量射频功率沉积的标准化方法,可以在检查扫描仪SAR值的准确性方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An MRI scanner-independent radiofrequency dosimeter for the estimation of RF power deposition with a human torso phantom

An assessment of radiofrequency (RF) power deposition independent of the information provided by MRI scanners is thus desirable. We developed a novel scanner-independent RF dosimeter based on measurements of the resistance of a thermistor that dissipates the RF power during scanning. With the RF dosimeter, the RF power deposition for four MRI sequences with specific absorption rate (SAR) values (0.1-3.3 W/kg) was measured on five different scanners and the correlation between the RF dosimeter reading and the SAR levels calculated by the scanners was investigated. The novel RF dosimeter showed a linear relationship between the RF power deposition and the scanner-reported whole-body averaged SAR for each scanner. However, there was a variability in the reading among different scanners. The RF dosimeter readings were 9.7 and 9.5 mW on GE 1.5 T (SAR=2.6 W/kg), 3.6 and 3.7 mW on Philips 1.5 T (SAR=3.3 W/kg), 9.5 and 8.6 mW on Siemens 3 T (SAR=3.0 W/kg), and 4.7 and 3.9 mW on Philips 3 T (SAR=2.6 W/kg), respectively. The scanner-independent RF dosimeter developed in this study can play a significant role in checking the accuracy of scanners’ SAR values as a standardized method for measuring the RF power deposition for MR safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B brings together engineers and physicists involved in the design and development of hardware and software employed in magnetic resonance techniques. The journal welcomes contributions predominantly from the fields of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), but also encourages submissions relating to less common magnetic resonance imaging and analytical methods. Contributors come from both academia and industry, to report the latest advancements in the development of instrumentation and computer programming to underpin medical, non-medical, and analytical magnetic resonance techniques.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Patient Body Posture on RF-Induced Energy Absorption by Orthopedic Plates Odd-Leg Birdcages for Geometric Decoupling in Multinuclear Imaging and Spectroscopy A General Framework for Automated Accurate Calculation of b-Matrix (Auto-b) in Diffusion MRI Pulse Sequences Development of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Magnet System for In Vivo Tooth Dosimetry Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease with Extreme Learning Machine on Whole-Brain Functional Connectivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1