单语偏见

F. Genesee
{"title":"单语偏见","authors":"F. Genesee","doi":"10.1075/jicb.21016.gen","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The developmental trajectory of monolinguals has often been used as the benchmark against which the progress of\n all language learners is assessed and understood, and the abilities of monolinguals are used to define the native-like competence\n that is widely cited as the ultimate goal for all language learners. Moreover, language learning standards and curricula to guide\n language teaching and learning in school, as well as frameworks and strategies for assessing language learner outcomes in school,\n have all been shaped in significant ways by a monolingual bias. In this article, I critically examine assumptions underlying the\n monolingual bias and review findings from research on preschool and early-school-age learners who acquire language under diverse\n circumstances. Explanations that go beyond the monolingual bias are proposed for findings of differences between children who\n learn language under diverse circumstances and monolingual children. I argue that current research supports the view that there\n are alternative pathways to becoming language competent.","PeriodicalId":44473,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The monolingual bias\",\"authors\":\"F. Genesee\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jicb.21016.gen\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The developmental trajectory of monolinguals has often been used as the benchmark against which the progress of\\n all language learners is assessed and understood, and the abilities of monolinguals are used to define the native-like competence\\n that is widely cited as the ultimate goal for all language learners. Moreover, language learning standards and curricula to guide\\n language teaching and learning in school, as well as frameworks and strategies for assessing language learner outcomes in school,\\n have all been shaped in significant ways by a monolingual bias. In this article, I critically examine assumptions underlying the\\n monolingual bias and review findings from research on preschool and early-school-age learners who acquire language under diverse\\n circumstances. Explanations that go beyond the monolingual bias are proposed for findings of differences between children who\\n learn language under diverse circumstances and monolingual children. I argue that current research supports the view that there\\n are alternative pathways to becoming language competent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21016.gen\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21016.gen","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

单语者的发展轨迹经常被用作评估和理解所有语言学习者进步的基准,单语者的能力被用来定义类似母语的能力,这被广泛引用为所有语言学习者的最终目标。此外,指导学校语言教学的语言学习标准和课程,以及评估学校语言学习者成果的框架和策略,都在很大程度上受到单语偏见的影响。在这篇文章中,我批判性地审视了单语偏见背后的假设,并回顾了对在不同环境下习得语言的学龄前和幼儿学习者的研究结果。对于在不同环境下学习语言的儿童与单语儿童之间的差异的发现,提出了超越单语偏见的解释。我认为,目前的研究支持这样一种观点,即有其他途径可以提高语言能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The monolingual bias
The developmental trajectory of monolinguals has often been used as the benchmark against which the progress of all language learners is assessed and understood, and the abilities of monolinguals are used to define the native-like competence that is widely cited as the ultimate goal for all language learners. Moreover, language learning standards and curricula to guide language teaching and learning in school, as well as frameworks and strategies for assessing language learner outcomes in school, have all been shaped in significant ways by a monolingual bias. In this article, I critically examine assumptions underlying the monolingual bias and review findings from research on preschool and early-school-age learners who acquire language under diverse circumstances. Explanations that go beyond the monolingual bias are proposed for findings of differences between children who learn language under diverse circumstances and monolingual children. I argue that current research supports the view that there are alternative pathways to becoming language competent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual students when attempting assessments in an L2 Academic achievement of minority home language students with special education needs in English language of instruction and French immersion programs Review of Dafouz & Smit (2023): Researching English-Medium Higher Education: Diverse Applications and Critical Evaluations of the ROAD-MAPPING Framework “Fingers which mean นิ้ว นิ้วแบบนิ้วมือ” Review of Lasagabaster (2022): English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1