{"title":"一场关于教育的全国性讨论——那么学校领导怎么办?","authors":"A. Harris, Carol Campbell, Michelle Jones","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2022.2134665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the dust begins to settle on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, many education systems around the world are considering what next? The pandemic has been a major interruption to the education of children and young people with ongoing significant consequences for their well being and mental health (Creswell et al. 2021). Hence, it would now seem appropriate, if not essential, that educators everywhere, including those leading and managing schools, address the important question of who and what matters most in the next phase of education. One thing is clear, it would be a huge, missed opportunity to simply revert to the norms and practices that defined the boundaries of education, in various countries, before the pandemic took hold. While the debate about ‘learning loss’ has dominated much of the discourse about education during COVID times, it is also clear that much has been learned and gained from the most disruptive period in contemporary history. If anything, as we move through and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, this should be a time to pause and reflect on exactly what type of education is fit for a future that will inevitably hold new challenges for those learners who are in education now, and the generation about to enter school. As Fullan (2022) notes ‘the decades from 2020 to 2050 will be the battleground for the next period of civilization for our 8 billion people, and all living things’. Major technological strides will offer children and young people many more choices around the nature and configuration of future learning and teaching. The rights of children and young people will be central to the configuration and delivery of education in the future. The voices of children and young people need to be heard in planning for educational change as ultimately, they are the ‘changemakers of the future’. Currently, the OECD is working on education scenario building for 2030 through wide consultation with different groups including students from around the world. They have developed a Learning Compass 2030 that elaborates different types of learning, within a broad structure, that acknowledges that learning does not only happen in schools. This is an evolving framework that is intended to generate and support discussion about future education possibilities. The OECD learning framework or compass offers a broad vision of the types of competencies students will need to thrive in 2030 and beyond. It also develops a common language and understanding that is globally relevant and informed, while providing space to adapt the framework to local contexts.","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"59 1","pages":"433 - 437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A national discussion on education – so what for school leaders?\",\"authors\":\"A. Harris, Carol Campbell, Michelle Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632434.2022.2134665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the dust begins to settle on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, many education systems around the world are considering what next? The pandemic has been a major interruption to the education of children and young people with ongoing significant consequences for their well being and mental health (Creswell et al. 2021). Hence, it would now seem appropriate, if not essential, that educators everywhere, including those leading and managing schools, address the important question of who and what matters most in the next phase of education. One thing is clear, it would be a huge, missed opportunity to simply revert to the norms and practices that defined the boundaries of education, in various countries, before the pandemic took hold. While the debate about ‘learning loss’ has dominated much of the discourse about education during COVID times, it is also clear that much has been learned and gained from the most disruptive period in contemporary history. If anything, as we move through and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, this should be a time to pause and reflect on exactly what type of education is fit for a future that will inevitably hold new challenges for those learners who are in education now, and the generation about to enter school. As Fullan (2022) notes ‘the decades from 2020 to 2050 will be the battleground for the next period of civilization for our 8 billion people, and all living things’. Major technological strides will offer children and young people many more choices around the nature and configuration of future learning and teaching. The rights of children and young people will be central to the configuration and delivery of education in the future. The voices of children and young people need to be heard in planning for educational change as ultimately, they are the ‘changemakers of the future’. Currently, the OECD is working on education scenario building for 2030 through wide consultation with different groups including students from around the world. They have developed a Learning Compass 2030 that elaborates different types of learning, within a broad structure, that acknowledges that learning does not only happen in schools. This is an evolving framework that is intended to generate and support discussion about future education possibilities. The OECD learning framework or compass offers a broad vision of the types of competencies students will need to thrive in 2030 and beyond. It also develops a common language and understanding that is globally relevant and informed, while providing space to adapt the framework to local contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"433 - 437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2134665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2134665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A national discussion on education – so what for school leaders?
As the dust begins to settle on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, many education systems around the world are considering what next? The pandemic has been a major interruption to the education of children and young people with ongoing significant consequences for their well being and mental health (Creswell et al. 2021). Hence, it would now seem appropriate, if not essential, that educators everywhere, including those leading and managing schools, address the important question of who and what matters most in the next phase of education. One thing is clear, it would be a huge, missed opportunity to simply revert to the norms and practices that defined the boundaries of education, in various countries, before the pandemic took hold. While the debate about ‘learning loss’ has dominated much of the discourse about education during COVID times, it is also clear that much has been learned and gained from the most disruptive period in contemporary history. If anything, as we move through and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, this should be a time to pause and reflect on exactly what type of education is fit for a future that will inevitably hold new challenges for those learners who are in education now, and the generation about to enter school. As Fullan (2022) notes ‘the decades from 2020 to 2050 will be the battleground for the next period of civilization for our 8 billion people, and all living things’. Major technological strides will offer children and young people many more choices around the nature and configuration of future learning and teaching. The rights of children and young people will be central to the configuration and delivery of education in the future. The voices of children and young people need to be heard in planning for educational change as ultimately, they are the ‘changemakers of the future’. Currently, the OECD is working on education scenario building for 2030 through wide consultation with different groups including students from around the world. They have developed a Learning Compass 2030 that elaborates different types of learning, within a broad structure, that acknowledges that learning does not only happen in schools. This is an evolving framework that is intended to generate and support discussion about future education possibilities. The OECD learning framework or compass offers a broad vision of the types of competencies students will need to thrive in 2030 and beyond. It also develops a common language and understanding that is globally relevant and informed, while providing space to adapt the framework to local contexts.
期刊介绍:
School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.