Zsolt Dubravcsik , István Hritz , Roland Fejes , Attila Szepes , László Madácsy
{"title":"内镜下电钳凝固法联合预防性胰腺支架植入术治疗乳头切开术后难治性出血","authors":"Zsolt Dubravcsik , István Hritz , Roland Fejes , Attila Szepes , László Madácsy","doi":"10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The overall risk of clinically significant post-papillotomy bleeding is 1–4%, most of them manifest as a delayed hemorrhage 2–5 days after ERCP. Injection method with diluted epinephrine is the standard first line therapy of endoscopic hemostasis in these patients. In therapy resistant cases endoscopic hemocliping is effective, but optimal positioning of the hemoclips is difficult and sometimes impossible. Thermal coagulation method with coagulation forceps combined with prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting could be an alternative in these cases.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We present 2 cases of recurrent post-papillotomy bleeding, both were detected in 1–6 days after the successful ERCP and EST. Standard endoscopic therapy with local injection of diluted epinephrine and/or application of hemoclips were ineffective. As a second line endoscopic therapy we used thermal coagulation of the bleeding vessels with coagulation forceps similarly to ESD. At the time of the thermal coagulation a 5F, 3–5 cm prophylactic pancreatic stent was applied to prevent pancreatitis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We achieved complete hemostasis in all patients without signs of further rebleeding or need for surgery. None of our patients developed post-procedure pancreatitis or perforation. Prophylactic pancreatic stents were safely removed after a few days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We presented a new, effective and safe second line endoscopic hemostatic method in patients with therapy resistant post-papillotomy bleeding. Combination of prophylactic pancreatic stenting and thermal coagulation with coagulation forceps might be suggested as a rescue treatment in patients with severe post-papillotomy bleeding, resistant to standard endoscopic therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101274,"journal":{"name":"Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 628-631"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.06.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Therapy of Refractory Post-Papillotomy Bleeding With Electrocautery Forceps Coagulation Method Combined With Prophylactic Pancreatic Stenting\",\"authors\":\"Zsolt Dubravcsik , István Hritz , Roland Fejes , Attila Szepes , László Madácsy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The overall risk of clinically significant post-papillotomy bleeding is 1–4%, most of them manifest as a delayed hemorrhage 2–5 days after ERCP. Injection method with diluted epinephrine is the standard first line therapy of endoscopic hemostasis in these patients. In therapy resistant cases endoscopic hemocliping is effective, but optimal positioning of the hemoclips is difficult and sometimes impossible. Thermal coagulation method with coagulation forceps combined with prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting could be an alternative in these cases.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We present 2 cases of recurrent post-papillotomy bleeding, both were detected in 1–6 days after the successful ERCP and EST. Standard endoscopic therapy with local injection of diluted epinephrine and/or application of hemoclips were ineffective. As a second line endoscopic therapy we used thermal coagulation of the bleeding vessels with coagulation forceps similarly to ESD. At the time of the thermal coagulation a 5F, 3–5 cm prophylactic pancreatic stent was applied to prevent pancreatitis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We achieved complete hemostasis in all patients without signs of further rebleeding or need for surgery. None of our patients developed post-procedure pancreatitis or perforation. Prophylactic pancreatic stents were safely removed after a few days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We presented a new, effective and safe second line endoscopic hemostatic method in patients with therapy resistant post-papillotomy bleeding. Combination of prophylactic pancreatic stenting and thermal coagulation with coagulation forceps might be suggested as a rescue treatment in patients with severe post-papillotomy bleeding, resistant to standard endoscopic therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 628-631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.06.002\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212097113000411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212097113000411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endoscopic Therapy of Refractory Post-Papillotomy Bleeding With Electrocautery Forceps Coagulation Method Combined With Prophylactic Pancreatic Stenting
Introduction
The overall risk of clinically significant post-papillotomy bleeding is 1–4%, most of them manifest as a delayed hemorrhage 2–5 days after ERCP. Injection method with diluted epinephrine is the standard first line therapy of endoscopic hemostasis in these patients. In therapy resistant cases endoscopic hemocliping is effective, but optimal positioning of the hemoclips is difficult and sometimes impossible. Thermal coagulation method with coagulation forceps combined with prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting could be an alternative in these cases.
Patients and methods
We present 2 cases of recurrent post-papillotomy bleeding, both were detected in 1–6 days after the successful ERCP and EST. Standard endoscopic therapy with local injection of diluted epinephrine and/or application of hemoclips were ineffective. As a second line endoscopic therapy we used thermal coagulation of the bleeding vessels with coagulation forceps similarly to ESD. At the time of the thermal coagulation a 5F, 3–5 cm prophylactic pancreatic stent was applied to prevent pancreatitis.
Results
We achieved complete hemostasis in all patients without signs of further rebleeding or need for surgery. None of our patients developed post-procedure pancreatitis or perforation. Prophylactic pancreatic stents were safely removed after a few days.
Conclusion
We presented a new, effective and safe second line endoscopic hemostatic method in patients with therapy resistant post-papillotomy bleeding. Combination of prophylactic pancreatic stenting and thermal coagulation with coagulation forceps might be suggested as a rescue treatment in patients with severe post-papillotomy bleeding, resistant to standard endoscopic therapy.