{"title":"fes控制的步态事件和用户意图检测:传感器的选择","authors":"B. J. Andrews, A. Kostov, R. Stein","doi":"10.1109/IEMBS.1995.579615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors follow a design method for event detectors using the ID3 rule induction algorithm. Rule induction was chosen mainly for two reasons: it ranks the relative importance of sensor signal attribute in detecting an event and, secondly, the reasoning of the algorithm may be understood by humans since the rules are organized in the familiar form of decision tree consisting of IF(...) THEN(...) ELSE(...) statements. This method allows the control system designer the freedom to position a set of available sensors in unobtrusive locations, such as braces, walking aids or the waistband, and operate them in less demanding environments. Furthermore, the method does not require a high level of intuition as to the contribution that each sensor makes to the detection of an event. Indeed, it has been shown that human experts perform poorly relative to the algorithm in ranking the importance of the sensors (C.A. Kirkwood, and B.J. Andrews, Proc. 11th IEEE EMBS Conf., Seattle, USA, p. 1020-1, 1989). Here, the authors describe a procedure in which a reliable event detector/predictor can be developed with a minimum of sensors. It will mimic a paraplegic's skill in using hand switches to control a simple FES walking system, i.e. it will signal the users implicit intention. This example of skill cloning follows that previously described (Kirkwood and Andrews, 1989).","PeriodicalId":20509,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","volume":"53 1","pages":"1153-1154 vol.2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait event and user intention detection for FES-control: selecting sensors\",\"authors\":\"B. J. Andrews, A. Kostov, R. Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMBS.1995.579615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors follow a design method for event detectors using the ID3 rule induction algorithm. Rule induction was chosen mainly for two reasons: it ranks the relative importance of sensor signal attribute in detecting an event and, secondly, the reasoning of the algorithm may be understood by humans since the rules are organized in the familiar form of decision tree consisting of IF(...) THEN(...) ELSE(...) statements. This method allows the control system designer the freedom to position a set of available sensors in unobtrusive locations, such as braces, walking aids or the waistband, and operate them in less demanding environments. Furthermore, the method does not require a high level of intuition as to the contribution that each sensor makes to the detection of an event. Indeed, it has been shown that human experts perform poorly relative to the algorithm in ranking the importance of the sensors (C.A. Kirkwood, and B.J. Andrews, Proc. 11th IEEE EMBS Conf., Seattle, USA, p. 1020-1, 1989). Here, the authors describe a procedure in which a reliable event detector/predictor can be developed with a minimum of sensors. It will mimic a paraplegic's skill in using hand switches to control a simple FES walking system, i.e. it will signal the users implicit intention. This example of skill cloning follows that previously described (Kirkwood and Andrews, 1989).\",\"PeriodicalId\":20509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"1153-1154 vol.2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1995.579615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1995.579615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本文采用了一种基于ID3规则归纳法的事件检测器设计方法。选择规则归纳法主要有两个原因:它对传感器信号属性在检测事件中的相对重要性进行了排序;其次,算法的推理可以被人类理解,因为规则被组织成由IF(…)组成的熟悉的决策树形式。然后(…)其他(…)语句。这种方法允许控制系统设计人员自由地将一组可用的传感器定位在不显眼的位置,例如支架,助行器或腰带,并在要求较低的环境中操作它们。此外,该方法不需要对每个传感器对事件检测的贡献有很高的直觉。事实上,在对传感器的重要性进行排序时,人类专家的表现与算法相比很差(C.A. Kirkwood, and B.J. Andrews, Proc. 11 IEEE EMBS Conf., Seattle, USA, p. 1020- 1,1989)。在这里,作者描述了一个过程,在这个过程中,一个可靠的事件检测器/预测器可以用最少的传感器开发。它将模仿截瘫患者使用手开关来控制一个简单的FES行走系统的技能,即它将向用户发出隐含的意图信号。这个技能克隆的例子遵循了之前的描述(Kirkwood和Andrews, 1989)。
Gait event and user intention detection for FES-control: selecting sensors
The authors follow a design method for event detectors using the ID3 rule induction algorithm. Rule induction was chosen mainly for two reasons: it ranks the relative importance of sensor signal attribute in detecting an event and, secondly, the reasoning of the algorithm may be understood by humans since the rules are organized in the familiar form of decision tree consisting of IF(...) THEN(...) ELSE(...) statements. This method allows the control system designer the freedom to position a set of available sensors in unobtrusive locations, such as braces, walking aids or the waistband, and operate them in less demanding environments. Furthermore, the method does not require a high level of intuition as to the contribution that each sensor makes to the detection of an event. Indeed, it has been shown that human experts perform poorly relative to the algorithm in ranking the importance of the sensors (C.A. Kirkwood, and B.J. Andrews, Proc. 11th IEEE EMBS Conf., Seattle, USA, p. 1020-1, 1989). Here, the authors describe a procedure in which a reliable event detector/predictor can be developed with a minimum of sensors. It will mimic a paraplegic's skill in using hand switches to control a simple FES walking system, i.e. it will signal the users implicit intention. This example of skill cloning follows that previously described (Kirkwood and Andrews, 1989).