研究不同射孔密度下支撑剂输运及其对水力裂缝内支撑剂沙丘发育的影响

M. B. Geri, Abdulmohsin Imqam, Mohammed Suhail
{"title":"研究不同射孔密度下支撑剂输运及其对水力裂缝内支撑剂沙丘发育的影响","authors":"M. B. Geri, Abdulmohsin Imqam, Mohammed Suhail","doi":"10.2118/195018-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Proppant transport adequately during hydraulic fracturing treatment assumes same perforation contribution through multi-perforation system. Proppant transport performance into the different ordination fracture system using multi-entry perforation technique is still not fully understood. This experimental study was aimed to deeply investigate five factors that affect proppant transport performance: number of perforations, perforation opening size, shear rate, fracture orientation, and proppant size distribution. The impact of these factors on proppant transport performance from different perspective was studied. Fracture slot model was designed and built to observe easily the effects of perforation density and fracture orientation. The results of this experimental work show that limited-entry perforation technique has significant impact on proppant transport within fractures where single top perforation had better proppant placement than multi-perforation system. Fracture area was approximately propped with 66% and 48% using top perforation and multi-perforation system, respectively. Slurry with high shear rate has a negative effect on the proppant equilibrium dune level (EDL) and fracture propped area (FPA). Fracturing treatment using high shear rate causes high pressure drop in the fracture that leads to decreasing EDL by 17% and fracture propped area by 23% comparing to using low shear rate. Using large proppant size (20/40) leads to form high EDL and FPA compared to 100 mesh size. Proppant transport dominated by four mechanisms and the vertexes near wellbore plays main mechanism to carry proppant farther inside the fracture.","PeriodicalId":10908,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019","volume":"281 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigate Proppant Transport with Varying Perforation Density and its Impact on Proppant Dune Development Inside Hydraulic Fractures\",\"authors\":\"M. B. Geri, Abdulmohsin Imqam, Mohammed Suhail\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195018-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Proppant transport adequately during hydraulic fracturing treatment assumes same perforation contribution through multi-perforation system. Proppant transport performance into the different ordination fracture system using multi-entry perforation technique is still not fully understood. This experimental study was aimed to deeply investigate five factors that affect proppant transport performance: number of perforations, perforation opening size, shear rate, fracture orientation, and proppant size distribution. The impact of these factors on proppant transport performance from different perspective was studied. Fracture slot model was designed and built to observe easily the effects of perforation density and fracture orientation. The results of this experimental work show that limited-entry perforation technique has significant impact on proppant transport within fractures where single top perforation had better proppant placement than multi-perforation system. Fracture area was approximately propped with 66% and 48% using top perforation and multi-perforation system, respectively. Slurry with high shear rate has a negative effect on the proppant equilibrium dune level (EDL) and fracture propped area (FPA). Fracturing treatment using high shear rate causes high pressure drop in the fracture that leads to decreasing EDL by 17% and fracture propped area by 23% comparing to using low shear rate. Using large proppant size (20/40) leads to form high EDL and FPA compared to 100 mesh size. Proppant transport dominated by four mechanisms and the vertexes near wellbore plays main mechanism to carry proppant farther inside the fracture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019\",\"volume\":\"281 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195018-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195018-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在水力压裂过程中,支撑剂的充分输送通过多射孔系统实现了相同的射孔贡献。使用多孔射孔技术,支撑剂在不同顺序裂缝体系中的输送性能仍未完全了解。本实验研究旨在深入研究影响支撑剂输运性能的五个因素:射孔数量、射孔开度、剪切速率、裂缝方向和支撑剂粒径分布。从不同角度研究了这些因素对支撑剂输运性能的影响。设计并建立了裂缝槽模型,便于观察射孔密度和裂缝方位的影响。实验结果表明,单顶射孔系统比多顶射孔系统具有更好的支撑剂放置效果,限制射孔技术对支撑剂在裂缝内的运移有显著影响。采用顶部射孔和多级射孔系统,裂缝面积分别约为66%和48%。高剪切速率的泥浆对支撑剂平衡沙丘水平(EDL)和裂缝支撑面积(FPA)有不利影响。与使用低剪切速率相比,使用高剪切速率的压裂处理会导致裂缝中的高压降,导致EDL减少17%,裂缝支撑面积减少23%。与100目支撑剂相比,使用大尺寸支撑剂(20/40)可以形成更高的EDL和FPA。支撑剂运移主要由4种机制主导,近井点是支撑剂进一步进入裂缝的主要机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigate Proppant Transport with Varying Perforation Density and its Impact on Proppant Dune Development Inside Hydraulic Fractures
Proppant transport adequately during hydraulic fracturing treatment assumes same perforation contribution through multi-perforation system. Proppant transport performance into the different ordination fracture system using multi-entry perforation technique is still not fully understood. This experimental study was aimed to deeply investigate five factors that affect proppant transport performance: number of perforations, perforation opening size, shear rate, fracture orientation, and proppant size distribution. The impact of these factors on proppant transport performance from different perspective was studied. Fracture slot model was designed and built to observe easily the effects of perforation density and fracture orientation. The results of this experimental work show that limited-entry perforation technique has significant impact on proppant transport within fractures where single top perforation had better proppant placement than multi-perforation system. Fracture area was approximately propped with 66% and 48% using top perforation and multi-perforation system, respectively. Slurry with high shear rate has a negative effect on the proppant equilibrium dune level (EDL) and fracture propped area (FPA). Fracturing treatment using high shear rate causes high pressure drop in the fracture that leads to decreasing EDL by 17% and fracture propped area by 23% comparing to using low shear rate. Using large proppant size (20/40) leads to form high EDL and FPA compared to 100 mesh size. Proppant transport dominated by four mechanisms and the vertexes near wellbore plays main mechanism to carry proppant farther inside the fracture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost and Time Effective Stimulation Technique in Horizontal Cemented Liner Application in Carbonate Reservoir With HPCT Hydrajetting Tools Single Trip Multizone Perforation and Gravel Pack STPP: Success Story and Lessons Learned in Malaysian Application Machine Learning and the Analysis of High-Power Electromagnetic Interaction with Subsurface Matter Acoustic Properties of Carbonate: An Experimental and Modelling Study Application of Renewable Energy in the Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1