1890年希腊梵蒂冈的Chalkokondyles碎片

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2298/zrvi1855249m
T. Mészáros
{"title":"1890年希腊梵蒂冈的Chalkokondyles碎片","authors":"T. Mészáros","doi":"10.2298/zrvi1855249m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In collating the Chalkokondyles manuscripts, one must account for the fragment extant in the Vaticanus Graecus 1890 (Vb) manuscript, which exceeds three folia (131r–134r) and runs to 152 lines.1 This fragment is all the more remarkable since, according to current state of research, the pages carrying the text are directly copied from the Monacensis 307a (M1) manuscript, one of the most important codices in the tradition, which has doubtlessly the most interesting history as well.2 The significance of the fragment is further increased by the fact that Jenő Darkó, who published the authoritative text edition, did not know the Vatican manuscript in question.","PeriodicalId":53859,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta","volume":"42 1","pages":"249-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Chalkokondyles fragment from the Vaticanus Graecus 1890\",\"authors\":\"T. Mészáros\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/zrvi1855249m\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In collating the Chalkokondyles manuscripts, one must account for the fragment extant in the Vaticanus Graecus 1890 (Vb) manuscript, which exceeds three folia (131r–134r) and runs to 152 lines.1 This fragment is all the more remarkable since, according to current state of research, the pages carrying the text are directly copied from the Monacensis 307a (M1) manuscript, one of the most important codices in the tradition, which has doubtlessly the most interesting history as well.2 The significance of the fragment is further increased by the fact that Jenő Darkó, who published the authoritative text edition, did not know the Vatican manuscript in question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"249-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/zrvi1855249m\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zrvi1855249m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在整理Chalkokondyles手稿时,必须考虑到梵蒂冈希腊1890年(Vb)手稿中现存的片段,它超过三页(131r-134r),长达152行根据目前的研究,这段文字的书页是直接抄写自Monacensis 307a (M1)手稿,这是传统中最重要的抄本之一,毫无疑问,它也有最有趣的历史这个残片的重要性进一步增加了一个事实,即出版权威文本版本的jenerDarkó不知道有问题的梵蒂冈手稿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Chalkokondyles fragment from the Vaticanus Graecus 1890
In collating the Chalkokondyles manuscripts, one must account for the fragment extant in the Vaticanus Graecus 1890 (Vb) manuscript, which exceeds three folia (131r–134r) and runs to 152 lines.1 This fragment is all the more remarkable since, according to current state of research, the pages carrying the text are directly copied from the Monacensis 307a (M1) manuscript, one of the most important codices in the tradition, which has doubtlessly the most interesting history as well.2 The significance of the fragment is further increased by the fact that Jenő Darkó, who published the authoritative text edition, did not know the Vatican manuscript in question.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta
Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
On the inscription on the baptismal font from the time of Prince Viseslav: Some epigraphic remarks Contract of loan and protection of debtors against usury in Serbian mediaeval law (regarding the influence of Byzantine law) Warrior saints at Nerezi - the selection of figures and other remarks on their iconography Obrok from article 110 of the Dushan code and posul from legal sources of Russian medieval law The serbs and the war against the Turks in the letters of Francesco Filelfo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1