功率多普勒超声与超声增强对类风湿关节炎滑膜炎临床缓解期活动性的预测价值比较

Jing Li, Hua Hong, D. Feng, Guozhu Wu, Ran Sun
{"title":"功率多普勒超声与超声增强对类风湿关节炎滑膜炎临床缓解期活动性的预测价值比较","authors":"Jing Li, Hua Hong, D. Feng, Guozhu Wu, Ran Sun","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasongraphy for rheumatoid arthritis synovitis activeness in clinical remission period. \n \n \nMethods \nSeventy-four patients (148 wrist joints) with remission rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed in Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital from September 2017 to July 2019 were selected. Of the enrolled patients, wrist joints with thickened synovial membrane were selected, and micro-vessels in synovial membrane were detected by power Doppler ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. The examination results in synovial thickness, display rate of blood flow signals and blood flow classification of the two methods were compared. \n \n \nResults \n①Mean synovial thickness detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was (5.17±2.06)mm, which was better than the (4.89±2.00)mm detected by power Doppler ultrasonography (t=8.765, P<0.001). ② Display rate of blood flow signals determined by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was 59.5% (69/116), better than the 26.7% (31/116) determined by power Doppler ultrasonography (P<0.001). ③ Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was superior to power Doppler ultrasonography in classifying blood flow signals (Kappa=0.173, P=0.043). \n \n \nConclusions \nContrast-enhanced ultrasonography could more accurate reflect the rheumatoid arthritis synovitis activeness in clinical remission period, and guide the clinical treatment. \n \n \nKey words: \nArthritis, rheumatoid; Clinical remission; Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Power Doppler ultrasound; Synovial inflammation","PeriodicalId":9667,"journal":{"name":"Central Plains Medical Journal","volume":"225 1","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of predictive values of power Doppler ultrasonography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasongraphy for rheumatoid arthritissynovitis activeness in clinical remission period\",\"authors\":\"Jing Li, Hua Hong, D. Feng, Guozhu Wu, Ran Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasongraphy for rheumatoid arthritis synovitis activeness in clinical remission period. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nSeventy-four patients (148 wrist joints) with remission rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed in Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital from September 2017 to July 2019 were selected. Of the enrolled patients, wrist joints with thickened synovial membrane were selected, and micro-vessels in synovial membrane were detected by power Doppler ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. The examination results in synovial thickness, display rate of blood flow signals and blood flow classification of the two methods were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\n①Mean synovial thickness detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was (5.17±2.06)mm, which was better than the (4.89±2.00)mm detected by power Doppler ultrasonography (t=8.765, P<0.001). ② Display rate of blood flow signals determined by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was 59.5% (69/116), better than the 26.7% (31/116) determined by power Doppler ultrasonography (P<0.001). ③ Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was superior to power Doppler ultrasonography in classifying blood flow signals (Kappa=0.173, P=0.043). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nContrast-enhanced ultrasonography could more accurate reflect the rheumatoid arthritis synovitis activeness in clinical remission period, and guide the clinical treatment. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nArthritis, rheumatoid; Clinical remission; Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Power Doppler ultrasound; Synovial inflammation\",\"PeriodicalId\":9667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Plains Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"225 1\",\"pages\":\"5-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Plains Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.05.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Plains Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.05.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨超声造影对类风湿关节炎滑膜炎活动性临床缓解期的预测价值。方法选取2017年9月至2019年7月内蒙古人民医院诊断的类风湿关节炎缓解期患者74例(148个腕关节)。选取滑膜增厚的腕关节,采用功率多普勒超声和超声增强检查滑膜内微血管。比较两种方法在滑膜厚度、血流信号显示率、血流分类等方面的检查结果。结果①超声造影检查滑膜厚度平均值为(5.17±2.06)mm,优于功率多普勒超声检查滑膜厚度平均值(4.89±2.00)mm (t=8.765, P<0.001);②超声造影血流信号显示率为59.5%(69/116),优于功率多普勒超声造影血流信号显示率26.7% (31/116)(P<0.001)。③超声造影对血流信号的分类优于功率多普勒超声(Kappa=0.173, P=0.043)。结论超声造影能更准确地反映类风湿关节炎滑膜炎在临床缓解期的活跃性,指导临床治疗。关键词:关节炎;类风湿;临床缓解期;超声造影;功率多普勒超声;滑膜炎症
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of predictive values of power Doppler ultrasonography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasongraphy for rheumatoid arthritissynovitis activeness in clinical remission period
Objective To investigate the predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasongraphy for rheumatoid arthritis synovitis activeness in clinical remission period. Methods Seventy-four patients (148 wrist joints) with remission rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed in Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital from September 2017 to July 2019 were selected. Of the enrolled patients, wrist joints with thickened synovial membrane were selected, and micro-vessels in synovial membrane were detected by power Doppler ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. The examination results in synovial thickness, display rate of blood flow signals and blood flow classification of the two methods were compared. Results ①Mean synovial thickness detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was (5.17±2.06)mm, which was better than the (4.89±2.00)mm detected by power Doppler ultrasonography (t=8.765, P<0.001). ② Display rate of blood flow signals determined by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was 59.5% (69/116), better than the 26.7% (31/116) determined by power Doppler ultrasonography (P<0.001). ③ Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was superior to power Doppler ultrasonography in classifying blood flow signals (Kappa=0.173, P=0.043). Conclusions Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography could more accurate reflect the rheumatoid arthritis synovitis activeness in clinical remission period, and guide the clinical treatment. Key words: Arthritis, rheumatoid; Clinical remission; Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Power Doppler ultrasound; Synovial inflammation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical analysis of 200 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block on patients undergoing endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Levels and significance of pepsinogen, gastrin 17 in serum in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis Application value of high-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of diabetic lower extremity vascular diseases Clinical effects of combination of edaravone, clopidogrel and butylphthalide injection on acute progressive cerebral infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1