Mannir Kassim, M. Danazumi, A. Yakasai, Abdulwahab Lawan, U. Zakari
{"title":"休闲时间体力活动约束对工人阶级个体体力活动参与的影响:一项横断面研究","authors":"Mannir Kassim, M. Danazumi, A. Yakasai, Abdulwahab Lawan, U. Zakari","doi":"10.4103/njecp.njecp_29_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Constraints to leisure-time physical activity (PA) have been studied by many researchers all over the world. However, these studies were based on prevalence and were not able to determine the impact of these constraints among working-class individuals. The current study was conducted to determine the impact and influence of leisure-time PA constraints (LTPACs) on PA participation of working-class individuals. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study of 401 participants was conducted. PA levels were measured using the International PA Questionnaire. LTPACs were measured using the Leisure Constraints Questionnaire. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the influence of the constraint variables on PA. Results: The results indicated that 34.4% of the participants were sufficiently active and 65.6% of the participants were not physically active. The predictor constraints explained 68.1% of the variability in PA (Nagelkerke R2=0.681). The most significant predictors were lack of friends (odds ratio [OR] =8.360, confidence interval [CI] =6.671–10.468), lack of time due to work (OR = 8.313, CI = 6.633–10.419), lack of interest (OR = 2.190, CI = 1.161–4.121), lack of knowledge (OR = 1.360, CI = 1.049–1.764), and inadequate facilities (OR = 1.181, CI = 1.083–1.276). Conclusion: LTPACs were reported to be endemic among working-class individuals. These constraints need to be highly considered when health-care policies are being developed to ensure good health and longevity of workers.","PeriodicalId":19420,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Biosciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"63 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of leisure-time physical activity constraints on physical activity participation of working-class individuals: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Mannir Kassim, M. Danazumi, A. Yakasai, Abdulwahab Lawan, U. Zakari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njecp.njecp_29_19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Constraints to leisure-time physical activity (PA) have been studied by many researchers all over the world. However, these studies were based on prevalence and were not able to determine the impact of these constraints among working-class individuals. The current study was conducted to determine the impact and influence of leisure-time PA constraints (LTPACs) on PA participation of working-class individuals. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study of 401 participants was conducted. PA levels were measured using the International PA Questionnaire. LTPACs were measured using the Leisure Constraints Questionnaire. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the influence of the constraint variables on PA. Results: The results indicated that 34.4% of the participants were sufficiently active and 65.6% of the participants were not physically active. The predictor constraints explained 68.1% of the variability in PA (Nagelkerke R2=0.681). The most significant predictors were lack of friends (odds ratio [OR] =8.360, confidence interval [CI] =6.671–10.468), lack of time due to work (OR = 8.313, CI = 6.633–10.419), lack of interest (OR = 2.190, CI = 1.161–4.121), lack of knowledge (OR = 1.360, CI = 1.049–1.764), and inadequate facilities (OR = 1.181, CI = 1.083–1.276). Conclusion: LTPACs were reported to be endemic among working-class individuals. These constraints need to be highly considered when health-care policies are being developed to ensure good health and longevity of workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njecp.njecp_29_19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njecp.njecp_29_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
世界各地的许多研究者都对休闲时间身体活动(PA)的制约因素进行了研究。然而,这些研究是基于患病率,并不能确定这些限制对工人阶级个体的影响。本研究旨在探讨休闲时间PA约束对工人阶级个人PA参与的影响。材料与方法:对401名参与者进行了横断面研究。使用国际PA问卷测量PA水平。ltpac采用休闲约束问卷进行测量。采用二项logistic回归分析确定约束变量对PA的影响。结果:34.4%的参与者身体活动充足,65.6%的参与者身体活动不足。预测因子约束解释了68.1%的PA变异性(Nagelkerke R2=0.681)。最显著的预测因子是缺乏朋友(优势比[OR] =8.360,可信区间[CI] = 6.671-10.468)、工作时间不足(OR = 8.313, CI = 6.633-10.419)、缺乏兴趣(OR = 2.190, CI = 1.161-4.121)、缺乏知识(OR = 1.360, CI = 1.049-1.764)和设施不足(OR = 1.181, CI = 1.083-1.276)。结论:ltpac在工人阶级人群中普遍存在。在制定保健政策以确保工人的健康和长寿时,需要高度考虑这些制约因素。
Influence of leisure-time physical activity constraints on physical activity participation of working-class individuals: A cross-sectional study
Introduction: Constraints to leisure-time physical activity (PA) have been studied by many researchers all over the world. However, these studies were based on prevalence and were not able to determine the impact of these constraints among working-class individuals. The current study was conducted to determine the impact and influence of leisure-time PA constraints (LTPACs) on PA participation of working-class individuals. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study of 401 participants was conducted. PA levels were measured using the International PA Questionnaire. LTPACs were measured using the Leisure Constraints Questionnaire. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the influence of the constraint variables on PA. Results: The results indicated that 34.4% of the participants were sufficiently active and 65.6% of the participants were not physically active. The predictor constraints explained 68.1% of the variability in PA (Nagelkerke R2=0.681). The most significant predictors were lack of friends (odds ratio [OR] =8.360, confidence interval [CI] =6.671–10.468), lack of time due to work (OR = 8.313, CI = 6.633–10.419), lack of interest (OR = 2.190, CI = 1.161–4.121), lack of knowledge (OR = 1.360, CI = 1.049–1.764), and inadequate facilities (OR = 1.181, CI = 1.083–1.276). Conclusion: LTPACs were reported to be endemic among working-class individuals. These constraints need to be highly considered when health-care policies are being developed to ensure good health and longevity of workers.