Ahmad Uzair Zubbir, Hani Mohd Said, Muhammad Abdulhadi, Evelyn Ling, Paul Sanchez, Nazri Nor, Nurhanim Ismail, A. M. Ismail
{"title":"非连续油管水泥封隔器解决方案在该地区的首次应用:在低价格环境下革命性的解决方案","authors":"Ahmad Uzair Zubbir, Hani Mohd Said, Muhammad Abdulhadi, Evelyn Ling, Paul Sanchez, Nazri Nor, Nurhanim Ismail, A. M. Ismail","doi":"10.2118/205719-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cement Packer is a cost-effective alternative to workover for monetizing hydrocarbon reservoirs above the well top packer. While conventional cement packer utilizes coil tubing for cement placement, an innovative and more cost-effective approach was successfully implemented with only slickline and pumping unit, without utilizing coil tubing. This reduced the overall cost of the well intervention by 60%, significantly reduced operational safety risks and is exceptionally suitable in the current challenging environment.\n Similar to conventional cement packer, the operation begins with setting a plug inside the tubing below the targeted perforation depth and punching the tubing to create tubing-casing communication. The tubing was then flushed with surfactant and weak acid to remove any potential contaminants. The cement was then bullheaded from the surface through the tubing and into the casing while being chased by two foam wiper balls. The foam wiper balls were subsequently pushed with inhibited sea water mixed with cement retarder to prevent any leftover cement from hardening in the tubing. The hardened cement column in the production casing then acts as a barrier to satisfy operating guideline for two pressure barriers in a well.\n Two cement packer jobs were performed during this campaign; one via conventional method with coil tubing unit (CTU) and a fit-for-purpose version without the CTU. Pressure test from the tubing and casing after the cement hardened indicated that the cement has effectively isolated both tubulars. Subsequent Cement Bond Log and Ultrasonic Imaging Tool demonstrated thick column of good cement thus confirming the cement integrity of the non-CTU method. It was able to achieve similar pressure isolation as the conventional CTU method at 60% lower cost which allowed for significant cost saving. It also reduced the operation time by 50% since the cement was pumped at a higher rate through the well tubing. The turbulent flow regime via high rate pumping also resulted in thicker column of good cement (200m vs 120m) compared to conventional method. The only drawback encountered was the unexpected obstruction caused by leftover cement behind the foam ball. However, this can be removed through milling or fine-tuning the retarded sea water recipe. Post perforation, there was a sharp increase in the tubing pressure while the casing pressure remained low, further confirming the success of this method. This innovative method will be the standard method for any future cement packer operations while the conventional method with coil tubing will only be applied in complex situations.\n This new Cement Packer technique has introduced substantial cost saving compared to the conventional cement packer method. It will enable monetization of more minor reservoirs. The method is exceptionally relevant to a mature field especially in the current challenging business environment.","PeriodicalId":10970,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Application of Non-Coiled Tubing Cement Packer Solution in the Region: A Game Changer in Revolutionizing an Enabling Solution During Low Price Environment\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Uzair Zubbir, Hani Mohd Said, Muhammad Abdulhadi, Evelyn Ling, Paul Sanchez, Nazri Nor, Nurhanim Ismail, A. M. Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205719-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Cement Packer is a cost-effective alternative to workover for monetizing hydrocarbon reservoirs above the well top packer. While conventional cement packer utilizes coil tubing for cement placement, an innovative and more cost-effective approach was successfully implemented with only slickline and pumping unit, without utilizing coil tubing. This reduced the overall cost of the well intervention by 60%, significantly reduced operational safety risks and is exceptionally suitable in the current challenging environment.\\n Similar to conventional cement packer, the operation begins with setting a plug inside the tubing below the targeted perforation depth and punching the tubing to create tubing-casing communication. The tubing was then flushed with surfactant and weak acid to remove any potential contaminants. The cement was then bullheaded from the surface through the tubing and into the casing while being chased by two foam wiper balls. The foam wiper balls were subsequently pushed with inhibited sea water mixed with cement retarder to prevent any leftover cement from hardening in the tubing. The hardened cement column in the production casing then acts as a barrier to satisfy operating guideline for two pressure barriers in a well.\\n Two cement packer jobs were performed during this campaign; one via conventional method with coil tubing unit (CTU) and a fit-for-purpose version without the CTU. Pressure test from the tubing and casing after the cement hardened indicated that the cement has effectively isolated both tubulars. Subsequent Cement Bond Log and Ultrasonic Imaging Tool demonstrated thick column of good cement thus confirming the cement integrity of the non-CTU method. It was able to achieve similar pressure isolation as the conventional CTU method at 60% lower cost which allowed for significant cost saving. It also reduced the operation time by 50% since the cement was pumped at a higher rate through the well tubing. The turbulent flow regime via high rate pumping also resulted in thicker column of good cement (200m vs 120m) compared to conventional method. The only drawback encountered was the unexpected obstruction caused by leftover cement behind the foam ball. However, this can be removed through milling or fine-tuning the retarded sea water recipe. Post perforation, there was a sharp increase in the tubing pressure while the casing pressure remained low, further confirming the success of this method. This innovative method will be the standard method for any future cement packer operations while the conventional method with coil tubing will only be applied in complex situations.\\n This new Cement Packer technique has introduced substantial cost saving compared to the conventional cement packer method. It will enable monetization of more minor reservoirs. The method is exceptionally relevant to a mature field especially in the current challenging business environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205719-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205719-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
水泥封隔器是一种具有成本效益的修井替代方案,可实现井顶封隔器上方油气储层的货币化。传统的水泥封隔器使用螺旋管进行固井,而一种创新的、更具成本效益的方法成功实施,仅使用钢丝绳和抽油机,而不使用螺旋管。这使得修井作业的总成本降低了60%,显著降低了作业安全风险,非常适合当前充满挑战的环境。与传统水泥封隔器类似,作业开始时,在目标射孔深度以下的油管内放置一个桥塞,然后冲孔油管,形成油管-套管连通。然后用表面活性剂和弱酸冲洗油管,以去除任何潜在的污染物。然后,在两个泡沫雨刷球的追逐下,将水泥从地面通过油管送入套管。随后,将泡沫刮水球与掺入水泥缓凝剂的抑制海水一起推进,以防止任何剩余的水泥在油管中硬化。然后,生产套管中的硬化水泥柱作为一个屏障,以满足井中两个压力屏障的操作指南。在该作业中进行了两次水泥封隔器作业;一种是采用常规方法,带有螺旋管单元(CTU),另一种是不带CTU的专用版本。水泥硬化后对油管和套管进行的压力测试表明,水泥有效地隔离了两根管。随后的水泥胶结测井和超声成像工具显示了厚的良好水泥柱,从而证实了非ctu方法的水泥完整性。它能够实现与传统CTU方法相似的压力隔离,成本降低60%,从而显著节省成本。由于水泥通过油管的速度更快,因此作业时间缩短了50%。与常规方法相比,通过高速率泵送的湍流流态也产生了更厚的优质水泥柱(200m vs 120m)。唯一的缺点是泡沫球后面残留的水泥会造成意想不到的阻塞。然而,这可以通过研磨或微调缓凝海水配方来消除。射孔后,油管压力急剧上升,而套管压力保持在较低水平,进一步证实了该方法的成功。这种创新的方法将成为未来任何水泥封隔器作业的标准方法,而传统的螺旋管方法只适用于复杂的情况。与传统的水泥封隔器方法相比,这种新型水泥封隔器技术大大节省了成本。它将使更多小型油藏货币化。该方法特别适用于成熟油田,尤其是在当前充满挑战的商业环境中。
First Application of Non-Coiled Tubing Cement Packer Solution in the Region: A Game Changer in Revolutionizing an Enabling Solution During Low Price Environment
Cement Packer is a cost-effective alternative to workover for monetizing hydrocarbon reservoirs above the well top packer. While conventional cement packer utilizes coil tubing for cement placement, an innovative and more cost-effective approach was successfully implemented with only slickline and pumping unit, without utilizing coil tubing. This reduced the overall cost of the well intervention by 60%, significantly reduced operational safety risks and is exceptionally suitable in the current challenging environment.
Similar to conventional cement packer, the operation begins with setting a plug inside the tubing below the targeted perforation depth and punching the tubing to create tubing-casing communication. The tubing was then flushed with surfactant and weak acid to remove any potential contaminants. The cement was then bullheaded from the surface through the tubing and into the casing while being chased by two foam wiper balls. The foam wiper balls were subsequently pushed with inhibited sea water mixed with cement retarder to prevent any leftover cement from hardening in the tubing. The hardened cement column in the production casing then acts as a barrier to satisfy operating guideline for two pressure barriers in a well.
Two cement packer jobs were performed during this campaign; one via conventional method with coil tubing unit (CTU) and a fit-for-purpose version without the CTU. Pressure test from the tubing and casing after the cement hardened indicated that the cement has effectively isolated both tubulars. Subsequent Cement Bond Log and Ultrasonic Imaging Tool demonstrated thick column of good cement thus confirming the cement integrity of the non-CTU method. It was able to achieve similar pressure isolation as the conventional CTU method at 60% lower cost which allowed for significant cost saving. It also reduced the operation time by 50% since the cement was pumped at a higher rate through the well tubing. The turbulent flow regime via high rate pumping also resulted in thicker column of good cement (200m vs 120m) compared to conventional method. The only drawback encountered was the unexpected obstruction caused by leftover cement behind the foam ball. However, this can be removed through milling or fine-tuning the retarded sea water recipe. Post perforation, there was a sharp increase in the tubing pressure while the casing pressure remained low, further confirming the success of this method. This innovative method will be the standard method for any future cement packer operations while the conventional method with coil tubing will only be applied in complex situations.
This new Cement Packer technique has introduced substantial cost saving compared to the conventional cement packer method. It will enable monetization of more minor reservoirs. The method is exceptionally relevant to a mature field especially in the current challenging business environment.