产业行为者对公立大学劳资纠纷的认知

J. Fejoh, M. Boyede, Abiola Sanusi
{"title":"产业行为者对公立大学劳资纠纷的认知","authors":"J. Fejoh, M. Boyede, Abiola Sanusi","doi":"10.36997/ijuev2021.65.3.344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has always been serious concern about how industrial actors in public universities in Nigeria perceive industrial disputes as a means of enforcing collective agreements jointly reached and signed. A group may likely see industrial disputes as unnecessary and destructive while others may see it as a veritable tool for enforcing their labour rights. This study therefore examined the industrial actors’ (university management, academic staff and non-teaching staff) perception of industrial disputes in public universities in Southwest, Nigeria. Descriptive research survey design was adopted for the study. The population consisted of the management staff and all the staff of public universities in Southwest, Nigeria. The sample size of the study was 280 respondents (80 management staff, 100 academic staff and 100 non-teaching staff) randomly selected from four public universities across Southwest geo-political zone. Data was collected through a selfdesigned questionnaire. T-test analysis was used to analyze the three hypotheses raised at 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that there was significant difference in the way university management, academic and non-teaching staff perceive industrial dispute while there is no significant difference in the way academic and non-teaching staff perceive industrial disputes. It is therefore recommended that all the industrial actors in public universities in Southwest, Nigeria should not see industrial disputes as destructive engagement since disputes are naturally part of organizational existence. Effective management of industrial disputes through sincerity of purpose should be adopted by the industrial actors.","PeriodicalId":30732,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiia Ikonomicheski universitet Varna","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industrial Actors` Perceptions of Industrial Disputes in Public Universities\",\"authors\":\"J. Fejoh, M. Boyede, Abiola Sanusi\",\"doi\":\"10.36997/ijuev2021.65.3.344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has always been serious concern about how industrial actors in public universities in Nigeria perceive industrial disputes as a means of enforcing collective agreements jointly reached and signed. A group may likely see industrial disputes as unnecessary and destructive while others may see it as a veritable tool for enforcing their labour rights. This study therefore examined the industrial actors’ (university management, academic staff and non-teaching staff) perception of industrial disputes in public universities in Southwest, Nigeria. Descriptive research survey design was adopted for the study. The population consisted of the management staff and all the staff of public universities in Southwest, Nigeria. The sample size of the study was 280 respondents (80 management staff, 100 academic staff and 100 non-teaching staff) randomly selected from four public universities across Southwest geo-political zone. Data was collected through a selfdesigned questionnaire. T-test analysis was used to analyze the three hypotheses raised at 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that there was significant difference in the way university management, academic and non-teaching staff perceive industrial dispute while there is no significant difference in the way academic and non-teaching staff perceive industrial disputes. It is therefore recommended that all the industrial actors in public universities in Southwest, Nigeria should not see industrial disputes as destructive engagement since disputes are naturally part of organizational existence. Effective management of industrial disputes through sincerity of purpose should be adopted by the industrial actors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Izvestiia Ikonomicheski universitet Varna\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Izvestiia Ikonomicheski universitet Varna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36997/ijuev2021.65.3.344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiia Ikonomicheski universitet Varna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36997/ijuev2021.65.3.344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼日利亚公立大学的工业行为者如何将工业争端视为执行共同达成和签署的集体协议的一种手段,一直令人严重关切。一个群体可能会认为劳资纠纷是不必要的和具有破坏性的,而另一些群体可能会认为这是一个名副其实的执行劳工权利的工具。因此,本研究调查了尼日利亚西南部公立大学的行业行为者(大学管理层、学术人员和非教学人员)对劳资纠纷的看法。本研究采用描述性调查设计。人口包括尼日利亚西南部公立大学的管理人员和所有工作人员。本研究的样本量为280名受访者(80名管理人员,100名学术人员和100名非教学人员),随机从西南地缘政治区域的四所公立大学中选择。通过自行设计的问卷收集数据。在0.05显著性水平上提出的三个假设采用t检验分析。研究发现,高校管理层、学术人员和非教学人员对劳资纠纷的感知存在显著差异,而学术人员和非教学人员对劳资纠纷的感知无显著差异。因此,建议尼日利亚西南部公立大学的所有工业行为者不应将工业纠纷视为破坏性的参与,因为纠纷自然是组织存在的一部分。工业行为者应该通过真诚的目的来有效地管理劳资纠纷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Industrial Actors` Perceptions of Industrial Disputes in Public Universities
There has always been serious concern about how industrial actors in public universities in Nigeria perceive industrial disputes as a means of enforcing collective agreements jointly reached and signed. A group may likely see industrial disputes as unnecessary and destructive while others may see it as a veritable tool for enforcing their labour rights. This study therefore examined the industrial actors’ (university management, academic staff and non-teaching staff) perception of industrial disputes in public universities in Southwest, Nigeria. Descriptive research survey design was adopted for the study. The population consisted of the management staff and all the staff of public universities in Southwest, Nigeria. The sample size of the study was 280 respondents (80 management staff, 100 academic staff and 100 non-teaching staff) randomly selected from four public universities across Southwest geo-political zone. Data was collected through a selfdesigned questionnaire. T-test analysis was used to analyze the three hypotheses raised at 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that there was significant difference in the way university management, academic and non-teaching staff perceive industrial dispute while there is no significant difference in the way academic and non-teaching staff perceive industrial disputes. It is therefore recommended that all the industrial actors in public universities in Southwest, Nigeria should not see industrial disputes as destructive engagement since disputes are naturally part of organizational existence. Effective management of industrial disputes through sincerity of purpose should be adopted by the industrial actors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
DEMAND AND COMPETITION IN THE RETAIL MARKET OF DIESEL FUEL IN BULGARIA THE CAPITAL MARKET MATTERS - THE EXPERIENCE OF THE GRAND DUCHY THE EFFECT OF INFORMAL ECONOMY ON HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT Building Effective Marketing Partners: a Tactical Tool to Achieve Customer Retention in the Face of Strong Competitors Brand Image, Customer Satisfaction and Consumer Purchase Intentions in the Banking Sector of Nigeria: Can Service Quality Strengthen the Relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1