静脉预防甲氧氯普胺对减少脊髓麻醉下紧急剖宫产术中及术后早期恶心呕吐的效果

Endalew Nigussie Simeneh Endalew, E. G. Gebremedhn, Amare Hailekiros Gebreegzi, Habtamu Getinet Kassahun, Adugna A Kassa, T. Abebe
{"title":"静脉预防甲氧氯普胺对减少脊髓麻醉下紧急剖宫产术中及术后早期恶心呕吐的效果","authors":"Endalew Nigussie Simeneh Endalew, E. G. Gebremedhn, Amare Hailekiros Gebreegzi, Habtamu Getinet Kassahun, Adugna A Kassa, T. Abebe","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nausea and vomiting is a common problem after spinal anaesthesia after cesarean section. Metoclopramide is reported to be effective in reducing the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting (NV). However, its effectiveness as monotherapy remains unexplored. Aims: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of metoclopramide prophylaxis on the prevention of nausea and vomiting after emergency cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Methods and material: A prospective non-controlled study was conducted at a referral hospital. Patients classified as metoclopramide group who received 10 mg IV prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis group. Pre-tested checklist and patient interview were employed to collect the data during operation, at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h after cesarean section. Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting between the groups. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the proportion of categorical variables between the groups. Results: The overall incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting were 25.8% and 48.5% in the treatment (n=66) group and non-treatment (n=66) group respectively. Prophylactic metoclopramide significantly reduced the overall incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting (25.8% vs. 48.5%, p=0.012) compared with non-treatment group. The median score for nausea on numeric rating scale was also reduced in the prophylaxis at the end of CS, 2 h and at 4 h after CS. Conclusion: The incidences of nausea and vomiting were high. The administration of prophylactic metoclopramide remarkably reduced the incidence and severity of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to the non-treatment group. We recommend metoclopramide prophylaxis for parturients undergoing emergency cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. In addition, preoperative risk stratification strategies and perioperative nausea and vomiting management protocols need to be established in the hospital.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Intravenous Metoclopramide Prophylaxis on the Reduction of Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Emergency Caesarean Section under Spinal Anaesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Endalew Nigussie Simeneh Endalew, E. G. Gebremedhn, Amare Hailekiros Gebreegzi, Habtamu Getinet Kassahun, Adugna A Kassa, T. Abebe\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6148.1000809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Nausea and vomiting is a common problem after spinal anaesthesia after cesarean section. Metoclopramide is reported to be effective in reducing the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting (NV). However, its effectiveness as monotherapy remains unexplored. Aims: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of metoclopramide prophylaxis on the prevention of nausea and vomiting after emergency cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Methods and material: A prospective non-controlled study was conducted at a referral hospital. Patients classified as metoclopramide group who received 10 mg IV prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis group. Pre-tested checklist and patient interview were employed to collect the data during operation, at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h after cesarean section. Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting between the groups. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the proportion of categorical variables between the groups. Results: The overall incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting were 25.8% and 48.5% in the treatment (n=66) group and non-treatment (n=66) group respectively. Prophylactic metoclopramide significantly reduced the overall incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting (25.8% vs. 48.5%, p=0.012) compared with non-treatment group. The median score for nausea on numeric rating scale was also reduced in the prophylaxis at the end of CS, 2 h and at 4 h after CS. Conclusion: The incidences of nausea and vomiting were high. The administration of prophylactic metoclopramide remarkably reduced the incidence and severity of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to the non-treatment group. We recommend metoclopramide prophylaxis for parturients undergoing emergency cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. In addition, preoperative risk stratification strategies and perioperative nausea and vomiting management protocols need to be established in the hospital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:恶心和呕吐是剖宫产术后脊柱麻醉后的常见问题。据报道,甲氧氯普胺可有效降低恶心和呕吐(NV)的发生率和严重程度。然而,其作为单一疗法的有效性仍未被探索。目的:评价甲氧氯普胺预防脊髓麻醉下紧急剖宫产术后恶心呕吐的效果。方法和材料:在一家转诊医院进行前瞻性非对照研究。甲氧氯普胺组患者接受10 mg静脉预防与不进行预防。采用预试检查表和患者访谈收集术中、剖宫产术后2、4、6小时的数据。使用学生t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验来比较两组之间恶心和呕吐的发生率和严重程度。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较两组间分类变量的比例。结果:治疗组(n=66)术中及术后早期恶心呕吐总发生率为25.8%,非治疗组(n=66)术后恶心呕吐总发生率为48.5%。与未治疗组相比,预防性甲氧氯普胺显著降低术中及术后早期恶心呕吐的总发生率(25.8% vs 48.5%, p=0.012)。在CS结束、CS后2小时和CS后4小时,预防组的恶心中位数评分也有所降低。结论:恶心、呕吐发生率高。与未治疗组相比,预防性施用甲氧氯普胺显著降低了术中和术后早期恶心呕吐的发生率和严重程度。我们建议在脊髓麻醉下进行紧急剖宫产的产妇预防使用甲氧氯普胺。此外,医院需要建立术前风险分层策略和围手术期恶心呕吐管理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Intravenous Metoclopramide Prophylaxis on the Reduction of Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Emergency Caesarean Section under Spinal Anaesthesia
Background: Nausea and vomiting is a common problem after spinal anaesthesia after cesarean section. Metoclopramide is reported to be effective in reducing the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting (NV). However, its effectiveness as monotherapy remains unexplored. Aims: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of metoclopramide prophylaxis on the prevention of nausea and vomiting after emergency cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Methods and material: A prospective non-controlled study was conducted at a referral hospital. Patients classified as metoclopramide group who received 10 mg IV prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis group. Pre-tested checklist and patient interview were employed to collect the data during operation, at 2 h, 4 h and 6 h after cesarean section. Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting between the groups. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the proportion of categorical variables between the groups. Results: The overall incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting were 25.8% and 48.5% in the treatment (n=66) group and non-treatment (n=66) group respectively. Prophylactic metoclopramide significantly reduced the overall incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting (25.8% vs. 48.5%, p=0.012) compared with non-treatment group. The median score for nausea on numeric rating scale was also reduced in the prophylaxis at the end of CS, 2 h and at 4 h after CS. Conclusion: The incidences of nausea and vomiting were high. The administration of prophylactic metoclopramide remarkably reduced the incidence and severity of intraoperative and early postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to the non-treatment group. We recommend metoclopramide prophylaxis for parturients undergoing emergency cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. In addition, preoperative risk stratification strategies and perioperative nausea and vomiting management protocols need to be established in the hospital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Sutured on the Pulmonary Trunk and Relevant Clinical Consequences Study in a Simulated Scenario of the Influence of Training and Personality in the Resolution of Critical Situations in Anaesthesiology Residents Pulmonary Thrombosis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Theory, Evidence, and Clinical Relevance to Resource-Limited Settings Management of Cerebropontine Angle Tumors on Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Facilitating Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Retrospective Observational Study Efficacy of Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block as Analgesic Modality in Clavicle Fractures: Exploring New Horizons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1