避孕套使用中的心与理性:性行为的内隐与外显态度预测因子。

K. L. Marsh, Blair T. Johnson, L. Scott-Sheldon
{"title":"避孕套使用中的心与理性:性行为的内隐与外显态度预测因子。","authors":"K. L. Marsh, Blair T. Johnson, L. Scott-Sheldon","doi":"10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We test the hypothesis that explicit and implicit measures of attitudes would differentially predict deliberate versus spontaneous behavior in the domain of condom use. Students completed explicit attitudinal and thought-listing measures about using condoms and implicit measures using attitude priming and Implicit Association Test (IAT) procedures. An attitude IAT measured the association between condom images and affective images; a self-identity IAT measured association of condoms with the self. We predicted and found that condom use with main partners was predicted by explicit measures but not implicit measures; the opposite was true for condom use with casual partners. Although the attitude priming measure was not positively correlated with casual condom use, the IATs were. The patterns of relations, however, were unexpectedly complex, due to a strong decrease in IAT effects over time, and different IATs assessing unique attitudinal dimensions.","PeriodicalId":79386,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","volume":"118 1","pages":"161-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"116","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart versus reason in condom use: implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior.\",\"authors\":\"K. L. Marsh, Blair T. Johnson, L. Scott-Sheldon\",\"doi\":\"10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We test the hypothesis that explicit and implicit measures of attitudes would differentially predict deliberate versus spontaneous behavior in the domain of condom use. Students completed explicit attitudinal and thought-listing measures about using condoms and implicit measures using attitude priming and Implicit Association Test (IAT) procedures. An attitude IAT measured the association between condom images and affective images; a self-identity IAT measured association of condoms with the self. We predicted and found that condom use with main partners was predicted by explicit measures but not implicit measures; the opposite was true for condom use with casual partners. Although the attitude priming measure was not positively correlated with casual condom use, the IATs were. The patterns of relations, however, were unexpectedly complex, due to a strong decrease in IAT effects over time, and different IATs assessing unique attitudinal dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"161-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"116\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 116

摘要

我们测试的假设,明确的和隐含的态度措施将不同地预测故意和自发的行为在避孕套的使用领域。学生们通过态度启动和内隐联想测试完成了关于使用避孕套的外显态度和思想清单测试和内隐测试。态度IAT测量避孕套图像和情感图像之间的关联;自我认同测试测量了避孕套与自我的联系。我们预测并发现,与主要伴侣使用避孕套可以通过明确的措施预测,但不能通过隐含的措施预测;与普通伴侣使用避孕套的情况正好相反。虽然态度启动测量与随意使用避孕套没有正相关,但IATs有正相关。然而,这种关系的模式出乎意料地复杂,因为随着时间的推移,IAT的影响会大幅下降,而且不同的IAT评估的是独特的态度维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heart versus reason in condom use: implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior.
We test the hypothesis that explicit and implicit measures of attitudes would differentially predict deliberate versus spontaneous behavior in the domain of condom use. Students completed explicit attitudinal and thought-listing measures about using condoms and implicit measures using attitude priming and Implicit Association Test (IAT) procedures. An attitude IAT measured the association between condom images and affective images; a self-identity IAT measured association of condoms with the self. We predicted and found that condom use with main partners was predicted by explicit measures but not implicit measures; the opposite was true for condom use with casual partners. Although the attitude priming measure was not positively correlated with casual condom use, the IATs were. The patterns of relations, however, were unexpectedly complex, due to a strong decrease in IAT effects over time, and different IATs assessing unique attitudinal dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phonologische Bewusstheit und ihre Frderung bei Kindern mit Strungen der Sprachentwicklung Primre und Sekundre Kontrolle versus Hartnckige Zielverfolgung und Flexible Zielanpassung Entwicklung der Emotionsregulation bei 2- und 3jhrigen Mdchen Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zum Einfluss persönlicher Prioritätensetzungen auf Maße der Stimuluspräferenz: Erste empirische Befunde
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1