测量不确定度计算实用指南

M. Zilli
{"title":"测量不确定度计算实用指南","authors":"M. Zilli","doi":"10.2174/1874340401306010020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper would provide the analyst with an easy to use step-by-step guide to calculate the uncertainty of measurement in implementing a new analytical method. There are two main ways to attain such an achievement. The first is to consider all the possible sources of variability and then to sum up all of them in the final calculation. The second is taking part in a collaborative trial and processing the resulting statistics. Both methods imply different advantages and drawbacks. It is up the analyst to choose the one fits best his requirements. Anyway it is nearly inescapable providing, along with the test result, its own uncertainty. This entire subject is stated by a standard well known to those who practise the profession of a chemical analyst, which is the UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This standard has been imposed by the European Community for matters concerning food and environmental surveillance, but it has also become part of the guidelines of several National Associations of Clinical Toxicology. This standard pledges the analyst to use validated analytical methods, issued by one of the national or international Standards Organizations or, at least, by an internationally acknowledged Scientific Society.","PeriodicalId":22859,"journal":{"name":"The Open Toxicology Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Practical Guide to the Calculation of Uncertainty of Measurement\",\"authors\":\"M. Zilli\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874340401306010020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper would provide the analyst with an easy to use step-by-step guide to calculate the uncertainty of measurement in implementing a new analytical method. There are two main ways to attain such an achievement. The first is to consider all the possible sources of variability and then to sum up all of them in the final calculation. The second is taking part in a collaborative trial and processing the resulting statistics. Both methods imply different advantages and drawbacks. It is up the analyst to choose the one fits best his requirements. Anyway it is nearly inescapable providing, along with the test result, its own uncertainty. This entire subject is stated by a standard well known to those who practise the profession of a chemical analyst, which is the UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This standard has been imposed by the European Community for matters concerning food and environmental surveillance, but it has also become part of the guidelines of several National Associations of Clinical Toxicology. This standard pledges the analyst to use validated analytical methods, issued by one of the national or international Standards Organizations or, at least, by an internationally acknowledged Scientific Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Toxicology Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Toxicology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874340401306010020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Toxicology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874340401306010020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文将为分析人员在实施一种新的分析方法时计算测量不确定度提供一个易于使用的分步指南。有两种主要方法可以达到这样的成就。第一种方法是考虑所有可能的变率来源,然后在最后的计算中把所有的变率来源加起来。第二种是参与合作试验,并处理由此产生的统计数据。两种方法都有不同的优点和缺点。这取决于分析师选择一个最适合他的需求。无论如何,随着测试结果的出现,它几乎不可避免地提供了自身的不确定性。这整个主题是由那些从事化学分析专业的人所熟知的标准来陈述的,这就是UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005。这一标准由欧共体用于食品和环境监测,但它也成为几个国家临床毒理学协会指导方针的一部分。本标准保证分析人员使用由国家或国际标准组织或至少由国际公认的科学学会发布的经过验证的分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Practical Guide to the Calculation of Uncertainty of Measurement
This paper would provide the analyst with an easy to use step-by-step guide to calculate the uncertainty of measurement in implementing a new analytical method. There are two main ways to attain such an achievement. The first is to consider all the possible sources of variability and then to sum up all of them in the final calculation. The second is taking part in a collaborative trial and processing the resulting statistics. Both methods imply different advantages and drawbacks. It is up the analyst to choose the one fits best his requirements. Anyway it is nearly inescapable providing, along with the test result, its own uncertainty. This entire subject is stated by a standard well known to those who practise the profession of a chemical analyst, which is the UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This standard has been imposed by the European Community for matters concerning food and environmental surveillance, but it has also become part of the guidelines of several National Associations of Clinical Toxicology. This standard pledges the analyst to use validated analytical methods, issued by one of the national or international Standards Organizations or, at least, by an internationally acknowledged Scientific Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Glucose Enhances Skin Sensitizer-induced NRF2 Activation In Vitro Blood Hemostasis Dysfunction and Inflammation in COVID-19 Patients: Viral and Host Active Molecules as Therapeutic Targets Key Role of the Rational Laboratory Strategy in Diagnostic, Analytical and Forensic Toxicology A Practical Guide to the Calculation of Uncertainty of Measurement The Relevance of Synergy Between Forensic Pathologist and Toxicologist in Medico-Legal Autopsies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1