你现在好点了吗?参与辅导计划的教师感知结果的调查

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH MENTORING & TUTORING Pub Date : 2021-03-15 DOI:10.1080/13611267.2021.1912476
Théophile Muhayimana
{"title":"你现在好点了吗?参与辅导计划的教师感知结果的调查","authors":"Théophile Muhayimana","doi":"10.1080/13611267.2021.1912476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This quantitative study examined mentees’ perceptions of the support they have received from a school-based mentoring program (SBMP) in which they have been involved for three years. The study involved 341teachers in seven schools that hosted the SBMP. The findings indicated that only 45.2% of participants ‘agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ that their mentors provided expected support. According to the findings, such a low level of teachers’ satisfaction with the program benefits may have stemmed from a high teacher-mentor ratio (56 for 1), limited mentor’s content knowledge, and time constraints. The study addresses the gap in the current literature on school-based mentoring practices when it comes to the language educational policies involving the use of English as a classroom language in postcolonial contexts. In particular, the study provides education decision-makers with a body of knowledge conducive to designing and implementing school-based mentoring programs that are likely to succeed.","PeriodicalId":46613,"journal":{"name":"MENTORING & TUTORING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are you better off now? An investigation of perceived outcomes among teachers involved in a mentoring program\",\"authors\":\"Théophile Muhayimana\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13611267.2021.1912476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This quantitative study examined mentees’ perceptions of the support they have received from a school-based mentoring program (SBMP) in which they have been involved for three years. The study involved 341teachers in seven schools that hosted the SBMP. The findings indicated that only 45.2% of participants ‘agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ that their mentors provided expected support. According to the findings, such a low level of teachers’ satisfaction with the program benefits may have stemmed from a high teacher-mentor ratio (56 for 1), limited mentor’s content knowledge, and time constraints. The study addresses the gap in the current literature on school-based mentoring practices when it comes to the language educational policies involving the use of English as a classroom language in postcolonial contexts. In particular, the study provides education decision-makers with a body of knowledge conducive to designing and implementing school-based mentoring programs that are likely to succeed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MENTORING & TUTORING\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MENTORING & TUTORING\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2021.1912476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MENTORING & TUTORING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2021.1912476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本定量研究考察了学员对他们参与了三年的校本辅导计划(SBMP)所获得的支持的看法。这项研究涉及了举办SBMP的7所学校的341名教师。调查结果显示,只有45.2%的参与者“同意”或“非常同意”他们的导师提供了预期的支持。研究发现,教师对项目收益的满意度如此之低,可能是由于教师与导师的比例较高(56比1),导师的内容知识有限,以及时间限制。当涉及到在后殖民背景下使用英语作为课堂语言的语言教育政策时,本研究解决了目前关于学校指导实践的文献中的空白。特别是,该研究为教育决策者提供了一个知识体系,有助于设计和实施可能成功的基于学校的辅导计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are you better off now? An investigation of perceived outcomes among teachers involved in a mentoring program
ABSTRACT This quantitative study examined mentees’ perceptions of the support they have received from a school-based mentoring program (SBMP) in which they have been involved for three years. The study involved 341teachers in seven schools that hosted the SBMP. The findings indicated that only 45.2% of participants ‘agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ that their mentors provided expected support. According to the findings, such a low level of teachers’ satisfaction with the program benefits may have stemmed from a high teacher-mentor ratio (56 for 1), limited mentor’s content knowledge, and time constraints. The study addresses the gap in the current literature on school-based mentoring practices when it comes to the language educational policies involving the use of English as a classroom language in postcolonial contexts. In particular, the study provides education decision-makers with a body of knowledge conducive to designing and implementing school-based mentoring programs that are likely to succeed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MENTORING & TUTORING
MENTORING & TUTORING EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Examining the perceptions of teacher candidates’ participating in a state-funded “Grow your own” initiative and exploring strategies that will retain them Freshmen’s intention to engage in faculty mentoring: applying the theory of planned behavior Editorial overview: mentoring throughout the process of professional practice Immediate and long-term outcomes of the Scholars Committed to Opportunities in Psychological Education (SCOPE) Program Tutors visualized through metaphorical narratives: a role unquestioned?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1