动物饲料中近似分析不确定度估计的方法验证与测量——单实验室验证方案(Nordtest方法)

D. M
{"title":"动物饲料中近似分析不确定度估计的方法验证与测量——单实验室验证方案(Nordtest方法)","authors":"D. M","doi":"10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to verify the proximate analysis (DM percent, Ash percent, CP percent, EE percent, and CF percent) using AOAC approved methods at the Feed Quality Control Laboratory, DLS, Savar, Dhaka, and to reduce measurement uncertainty in each test in the laboratory. To verify the test procedures, a laboratory-made control sample (full-fat soybean), a certified control sample, and two Proficiency test feed samples (List A) were employed, together with various calibrate equipment (Table 1,2). This strategy was put to the test in terms of precision, accuracy, and consistency. Limits of Detection (LOD), Limits of Quantification (LOQ), Robustness, and Ruggedness, on the other hand, are irrelevant in these verification and uncertainty assessment techniques. Tests were carried out over a period of several months to verify this process and to assess the uncertainty more precisely. The Recovery percent was determined for the accuracy test, the Nordtest technique (Single Laboratory Verification Technique), and FAO. 2011 guidelines were used to assess the precision of the methods’ long-term repeatability. The recovery% of the determination of DM%, Ash%, CF%, EE%, and CP% of the Laboratory manufactured Reference sample, FAPAS Proficiency test sample-1, and Sample 2 (Tables 3-7) were within 98-102%, while the precision was determined by long-term repeatability (SRw) was 0.87%, 0.13%, 0.29%, 0.25%, and 0.35%, respectively, which met the criterion (Table 2) of FAO guideline. The measurement uncertainty was computed using the Nordtest method (Single Laboratory Verification Technique) and FAO. 2011 criteria, based on the longterm repeatability of the proximal components in the acknowledged laboratory. According to the guideline, the Expanded Measurement Uncertainty for DM percent, Ash percent, CF percent, EE percent, and CP percent was 0.99, 0.89, 1.02, and 1.82 percent, respectively, which was quite satisfactory. So, in the respective laboratory-Feed Quality Control Laboratory, Department of Livestock Services, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh-this verification for proximate components analysis of the animal feed is validated.","PeriodicalId":91055,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method Verification and Measurement of Uncertainty Estimation for the Proximate Analysis in Animal Feed-Single Laboratory Verification Protocol (Nordtest Approach)\",\"authors\":\"D. M\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to verify the proximate analysis (DM percent, Ash percent, CP percent, EE percent, and CF percent) using AOAC approved methods at the Feed Quality Control Laboratory, DLS, Savar, Dhaka, and to reduce measurement uncertainty in each test in the laboratory. To verify the test procedures, a laboratory-made control sample (full-fat soybean), a certified control sample, and two Proficiency test feed samples (List A) were employed, together with various calibrate equipment (Table 1,2). This strategy was put to the test in terms of precision, accuracy, and consistency. Limits of Detection (LOD), Limits of Quantification (LOQ), Robustness, and Ruggedness, on the other hand, are irrelevant in these verification and uncertainty assessment techniques. Tests were carried out over a period of several months to verify this process and to assess the uncertainty more precisely. The Recovery percent was determined for the accuracy test, the Nordtest technique (Single Laboratory Verification Technique), and FAO. 2011 guidelines were used to assess the precision of the methods’ long-term repeatability. The recovery% of the determination of DM%, Ash%, CF%, EE%, and CP% of the Laboratory manufactured Reference sample, FAPAS Proficiency test sample-1, and Sample 2 (Tables 3-7) were within 98-102%, while the precision was determined by long-term repeatability (SRw) was 0.87%, 0.13%, 0.29%, 0.25%, and 0.35%, respectively, which met the criterion (Table 2) of FAO guideline. The measurement uncertainty was computed using the Nordtest method (Single Laboratory Verification Technique) and FAO. 2011 criteria, based on the longterm repeatability of the proximal components in the acknowledged laboratory. According to the guideline, the Expanded Measurement Uncertainty for DM percent, Ash percent, CF percent, EE percent, and CP percent was 0.99, 0.89, 1.02, and 1.82 percent, respectively, which was quite satisfactory. So, in the respective laboratory-Feed Quality Control Laboratory, Department of Livestock Services, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh-this verification for proximate components analysis of the animal feed is validated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是在达卡萨瓦尔DLS饲料质量控制实验室使用AOAC批准的方法验证近似分析(DM百分比,灰分百分比,CP百分比,EE百分比和CF百分比),并减少实验室中每个测试的测量不确定度。为了验证测试程序,使用了一个实验室自制的对照样品(全脂大豆),一个认证的对照样品和两个熟练度测试饲料样品(清单a),以及各种校准设备(表1,2)。这一策略在精确性、准确性和一致性方面受到了考验。另一方面,检测限(LOD)、定量限(LOQ)、鲁棒性和坚固性在这些验证和不确定度评估技术中是无关的。在几个月的时间里进行了测试,以验证这一过程并更准确地评估不确定性。确定了准确度测试、Nordtest技术(单实验室验证技术)和FAO的回收率。2011年指南用于评估方法长期可重复性的精确性。样品1、样品2(表3-7)测定DM%、Ash%、CF%、EE%、CP%的回收率在98-102%范围内,长期重复性(SRw)测定的精密度分别为0.87%、0.13%、0.29%、0.25%、0.35%,符合FAO指南标准(表2)。测量不确定度采用Nordtest方法(单实验室验证技术)和FAO计算。2011年标准,基于近端成分在认可实验室的长期可重复性。根据指南,DM %、Ash %、CF %、EE %和CP %的扩展测量不确定度分别为0.99、0.89、1.02和1.82%,满足要求。因此,在相应的实验室——孟加拉国达卡萨瓦尔畜牧服务部饲料质量控制实验室——对动物饲料的近似成分分析进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Method Verification and Measurement of Uncertainty Estimation for the Proximate Analysis in Animal Feed-Single Laboratory Verification Protocol (Nordtest Approach)
The purpose of this study was to verify the proximate analysis (DM percent, Ash percent, CP percent, EE percent, and CF percent) using AOAC approved methods at the Feed Quality Control Laboratory, DLS, Savar, Dhaka, and to reduce measurement uncertainty in each test in the laboratory. To verify the test procedures, a laboratory-made control sample (full-fat soybean), a certified control sample, and two Proficiency test feed samples (List A) were employed, together with various calibrate equipment (Table 1,2). This strategy was put to the test in terms of precision, accuracy, and consistency. Limits of Detection (LOD), Limits of Quantification (LOQ), Robustness, and Ruggedness, on the other hand, are irrelevant in these verification and uncertainty assessment techniques. Tests were carried out over a period of several months to verify this process and to assess the uncertainty more precisely. The Recovery percent was determined for the accuracy test, the Nordtest technique (Single Laboratory Verification Technique), and FAO. 2011 guidelines were used to assess the precision of the methods’ long-term repeatability. The recovery% of the determination of DM%, Ash%, CF%, EE%, and CP% of the Laboratory manufactured Reference sample, FAPAS Proficiency test sample-1, and Sample 2 (Tables 3-7) were within 98-102%, while the precision was determined by long-term repeatability (SRw) was 0.87%, 0.13%, 0.29%, 0.25%, and 0.35%, respectively, which met the criterion (Table 2) of FAO guideline. The measurement uncertainty was computed using the Nordtest method (Single Laboratory Verification Technique) and FAO. 2011 criteria, based on the longterm repeatability of the proximal components in the acknowledged laboratory. According to the guideline, the Expanded Measurement Uncertainty for DM percent, Ash percent, CF percent, EE percent, and CP percent was 0.99, 0.89, 1.02, and 1.82 percent, respectively, which was quite satisfactory. So, in the respective laboratory-Feed Quality Control Laboratory, Department of Livestock Services, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh-this verification for proximate components analysis of the animal feed is validated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential Antidiabetic Properties of Syzygium Cumini (L.) Skeels Leaf Extract-Mediated Silver Nanoparticles Coupling Gloomy Eyelets in the Nucleus of Cells and Forming Unknown Distinct Structure (UDS) Development of Solid-Contact Potentiometric Sensor Utilized Nanocarbon-filled Poly (vinyl chloride) Membrane as Ion-to-electron Transducing Layer Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Curcumin-NSAIDs Conjugates An Overview about the Relationship between Cystatin C and Inflammatory Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1