保存难闻气味:历史遗迹气味的来源、方法和猜想

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Future Anterior Pub Date : 2017-05-16 DOI:10.5749/FUTUANTE.13.2.0023
Melanie A. Kiechle
{"title":"保存难闻气味:历史遗迹气味的来源、方法和猜想","authors":"Melanie A. Kiechle","doi":"10.5749/FUTUANTE.13.2.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to re-odor historic sites by offering an overview of the sources and methods that historians have been using to understand smells and olfaction in the past. In addition, it argues that preservationists must consider both material odors and the historic perception of those smells, which differs from contemporary audience’s perceptions of the same scents. It will not be enough for preservationists to recreate historic odors; they must explain how people in the past understood and reacted to these aromas, and find ways to engage visitors who react with disgust to a past that smells differently from the present.","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"13 1","pages":"22 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserving the Unpleasant: Sources, Methods, and Conjectures for Odors at Historic Sites\",\"authors\":\"Melanie A. Kiechle\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/FUTUANTE.13.2.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article seeks to re-odor historic sites by offering an overview of the sources and methods that historians have been using to understand smells and olfaction in the past. In addition, it argues that preservationists must consider both material odors and the historic perception of those smells, which differs from contemporary audience’s perceptions of the same scents. It will not be enough for preservationists to recreate historic odors; they must explain how people in the past understood and reacted to these aromas, and find ways to engage visitors who react with disgust to a past that smells differently from the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Anterior\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Anterior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/FUTUANTE.13.2.0023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/FUTUANTE.13.2.0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇文章试图通过提供历史学家过去用来理解气味和嗅觉的来源和方法的概述来重新闻到历史遗迹。此外,它认为保护主义者必须考虑材料气味和历史对这些气味的感知,这与当代观众对相同气味的感知不同。对于保护主义者来说,仅仅重现历史气味是不够的;他们必须解释过去的人们对这些气味的理解和反应,并找到方法吸引那些对气味不同于现在的过去感到厌恶的游客。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preserving the Unpleasant: Sources, Methods, and Conjectures for Odors at Historic Sites
This article seeks to re-odor historic sites by offering an overview of the sources and methods that historians have been using to understand smells and olfaction in the past. In addition, it argues that preservationists must consider both material odors and the historic perception of those smells, which differs from contemporary audience’s perceptions of the same scents. It will not be enough for preservationists to recreate historic odors; they must explain how people in the past understood and reacted to these aromas, and find ways to engage visitors who react with disgust to a past that smells differently from the present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Anterior
Future Anterior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Life and Death of Skanderbeg Square: A Chronicle of an Undoing Foretold, in a Hundred Years Slightly Disappointing Ruins and the Facades of Tourist Imagery Dirty Industry, Heritage, and the Erasure of Immigrant Pasts The Necessary Interlinking of Culture and Climate Change Heritage Conservation in Postcolonial India: Approaches and Challenges ed. by Manish Chalana and Ashima Krishna (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1