加纳配偶对工资、劳动力供应和家庭生产的影响

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q3 ECONOMICS South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences Pub Date : 2021-03-02 DOI:10.4102/SAJEMS.V24I1.3535
Emmanuel Orkoh, P. Blaauw, C. Claassen
{"title":"加纳配偶对工资、劳动力供应和家庭生产的影响","authors":"Emmanuel Orkoh, P. Blaauw, C. Claassen","doi":"10.4102/SAJEMS.V24I1.3535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theory of working spouse premium or penalty postulates that a spouse’s hours of work impact their partner’s wages while the theory of labour supply suggests that spouses’ wages influence their partners’ hours of work (Killewald & Gough 2013; Song 2007; Weeden, Cha & Bucca 2016). These seemingly contradicting theories have attracted a vast amount of empirical literature in developed countries (Glauber 2007; Kelly & Grant 2012; Killewald 2013; Schmitt 2010). However, very limited evidence exists in developing countries where labour market rigidities, social norms and cultural values play an important role in shaping the extent of validity (or otherwise) of these theories (Petersen, Penner & Hogsnes 2011). Most of the studies on marriage premiums or penalties have focused mainly on the husband. According to Breusch and Gray (2004), the little evidence that is available shows positive (but small), zero or even negative effects of marriage on women’s remuneration. In many developing countries, social norms and cultural practices influence intra-household bargaining power, gender roles and resources allocation (Doss 2013). This means that analysis of the determinants of labour market outcomes and household production need to be context specific.","PeriodicalId":46244,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spousal effects on wages, labour supply and household production in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Orkoh, P. Blaauw, C. Claassen\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/SAJEMS.V24I1.3535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theory of working spouse premium or penalty postulates that a spouse’s hours of work impact their partner’s wages while the theory of labour supply suggests that spouses’ wages influence their partners’ hours of work (Killewald & Gough 2013; Song 2007; Weeden, Cha & Bucca 2016). These seemingly contradicting theories have attracted a vast amount of empirical literature in developed countries (Glauber 2007; Kelly & Grant 2012; Killewald 2013; Schmitt 2010). However, very limited evidence exists in developing countries where labour market rigidities, social norms and cultural values play an important role in shaping the extent of validity (or otherwise) of these theories (Petersen, Penner & Hogsnes 2011). Most of the studies on marriage premiums or penalties have focused mainly on the husband. According to Breusch and Gray (2004), the little evidence that is available shows positive (but small), zero or even negative effects of marriage on women’s remuneration. In many developing countries, social norms and cultural practices influence intra-household bargaining power, gender roles and resources allocation (Doss 2013). This means that analysis of the determinants of labour market outcomes and household production need to be context specific.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJEMS.V24I1.3535\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJEMS.V24I1.3535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作配偶溢价或惩罚理论假设配偶的工作时间影响其伴侣的工资,而劳动力供给理论则认为配偶的工资影响其伴侣的工作时间(Killewald & Gough 2013;首歌2007;Weeden, Cha & Bucca 2016)。这些看似矛盾的理论在发达国家吸引了大量的实证文献(Glauber 2007;Kelly & Grant 2012;Killewald 2013;施密特2010)。然而,在发展中国家,劳动力市场的僵化、社会规范和文化价值观在塑造这些理论的有效性(或其他方面)方面发挥着重要作用,证据非常有限(Petersen, Penner & Hogsnes 2011)。大多数关于婚姻奖罚的研究主要集中在丈夫身上。根据Breusch和Gray(2004)的研究,很少有证据表明婚姻对女性薪酬有积极(但很小)、零甚至负面的影响。在许多发展中国家,社会规范和文化习俗影响家庭内部议价能力、性别角色和资源分配(Doss 2013)。这意味着对劳动力市场结果和家庭生产的决定因素的分析需要因地制宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spousal effects on wages, labour supply and household production in Ghana
The theory of working spouse premium or penalty postulates that a spouse’s hours of work impact their partner’s wages while the theory of labour supply suggests that spouses’ wages influence their partners’ hours of work (Killewald & Gough 2013; Song 2007; Weeden, Cha & Bucca 2016). These seemingly contradicting theories have attracted a vast amount of empirical literature in developed countries (Glauber 2007; Kelly & Grant 2012; Killewald 2013; Schmitt 2010). However, very limited evidence exists in developing countries where labour market rigidities, social norms and cultural values play an important role in shaping the extent of validity (or otherwise) of these theories (Petersen, Penner & Hogsnes 2011). Most of the studies on marriage premiums or penalties have focused mainly on the husband. According to Breusch and Gray (2004), the little evidence that is available shows positive (but small), zero or even negative effects of marriage on women’s remuneration. In many developing countries, social norms and cultural practices influence intra-household bargaining power, gender roles and resources allocation (Doss 2013). This means that analysis of the determinants of labour market outcomes and household production need to be context specific.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS) is a leading South African-based publication for interdisciplinary research in the economic and management sciences. The journal publishes and disseminates high-quality academic articles that contribute to the better understanding of the interaction between economic, environmental and social perspectives as applicable to the broader management sciences in an African environment. The editorial board therefore invites authors to submit their research from areas such as economics, finance, accounting, human capital, marketing and other related disciplines that break down common intellectual silos and prepares a new path for debate on the operation and development of sustainable markets and organisations as relevant to the broader African context.
期刊最新文献
Anti-consumption: Investigating the role of socio-psychological factors in motivating customers to help other customers not to shop Business-to-Business sellers’ motivations in sales performance – A six-dimensional framework proposition Unobserved heterogeneity of dynamic capability and sustainable performance of dairy microfirms How attitude, need for achievement and self control personality shape entrepreneurial intention in students A sectoral analysis of output elasticity of employment in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1