全膝关节置换术短期翻修的相关因素

G. Abel, Carnero Martín de Soto Pablo, Fernández de Arróyabe Sáez de Ojer Naiara, Montes Molinero David, A. Francisco, G. David
{"title":"全膝关节置换术短期翻修的相关因素","authors":"G. Abel, Carnero Martín de Soto Pablo, Fernández de Arróyabe Sáez de Ojer Naiara, Montes Molinero David, A. Francisco, G. David","doi":"10.11648/j.js.20180606.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To present the short-term complications that required revision surgery on total knee arthroplasty (TKAs) performed during the 2012-2013 period. Objective: To study the relation of complication appearance and type with the prosthesis model and surgical team experience. Methods: Study of patients undergoing TKA at our center between January 2012 and June 2013. Surgical teams were stratified according to the experience of the surgeon. Two different implants were utilized for this study. The following postoperative data were collected: indication for review, time of follow-up from the intervention to the indication for review (in months) and the reason for revision. A total of 322 TKAs were performed. The follow-up time from the placement of the first prosthesis was 35.48 ± 10.23 months. A revision was indicated for 60 of the 322 implanted prostheses (18.6%). The most frequent causes were aseptic loosening in 22 cases (37.9%), and anterior pain in 19 cases (32.8%). According to the prosthetic model, 11 revisions belonged to the A model (18.3%), and 49 (81%) to the B model. These results were statistically significant (p <0.001). Odds Ratio 5.78 (95% CI: 2.87-11.62). In teams with no expert in arthroplasty, the percentage of revision for instability was 8.3%; in teams with one expert, it was 4%; and in teams with two experts, it was 0%. Discussion: There is an increase in the number of reviews in knee arthroplasty surgery. The reasons for failure of total knee arthroplasty depend on several factors, including surgical techniques, implants, demographic variants, etc. The experience of the surgeon seems to influence the number of revisions. Patellofemoral kinematics also influences the evolution of total knee arthroplasty. One of the most important factors is the trochlear groove. Although the optimal troclear design has not been established. Conclusions: The prosthetic model seems to influence the survival of total knee arthroplasty. It is preferable that the surgical team always include a surgeon with expertise in knee arthroplasty.","PeriodicalId":101237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with a Short-Term Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"G. Abel, Carnero Martín de Soto Pablo, Fernández de Arróyabe Sáez de Ojer Naiara, Montes Molinero David, A. Francisco, G. David\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/j.js.20180606.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To present the short-term complications that required revision surgery on total knee arthroplasty (TKAs) performed during the 2012-2013 period. Objective: To study the relation of complication appearance and type with the prosthesis model and surgical team experience. Methods: Study of patients undergoing TKA at our center between January 2012 and June 2013. Surgical teams were stratified according to the experience of the surgeon. Two different implants were utilized for this study. The following postoperative data were collected: indication for review, time of follow-up from the intervention to the indication for review (in months) and the reason for revision. A total of 322 TKAs were performed. The follow-up time from the placement of the first prosthesis was 35.48 ± 10.23 months. A revision was indicated for 60 of the 322 implanted prostheses (18.6%). The most frequent causes were aseptic loosening in 22 cases (37.9%), and anterior pain in 19 cases (32.8%). According to the prosthetic model, 11 revisions belonged to the A model (18.3%), and 49 (81%) to the B model. These results were statistically significant (p <0.001). Odds Ratio 5.78 (95% CI: 2.87-11.62). In teams with no expert in arthroplasty, the percentage of revision for instability was 8.3%; in teams with one expert, it was 4%; and in teams with two experts, it was 0%. Discussion: There is an increase in the number of reviews in knee arthroplasty surgery. The reasons for failure of total knee arthroplasty depend on several factors, including surgical techniques, implants, demographic variants, etc. The experience of the surgeon seems to influence the number of revisions. Patellofemoral kinematics also influences the evolution of total knee arthroplasty. One of the most important factors is the trochlear groove. Although the optimal troclear design has not been established. Conclusions: The prosthetic model seems to influence the survival of total knee arthroplasty. It is preferable that the surgical team always include a surgeon with expertise in knee arthroplasty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20180606.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20180606.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:介绍2012-2013年期间全膝关节置换术(tka)需要翻修手术的短期并发症。目的:探讨并发症的出现和类型与假体模型及手术团队经验的关系。方法:对2012年1月至2013年6月在我中心行TKA的患者进行研究。手术小组根据外科医生的经验分层。本研究使用了两种不同的植入物。收集以下术后资料:回顾指征,从干预到回顾指征的随访时间(月)和回顾的原因。总共进行了322例tka。术后随访时间为35.48±10.23个月。322例植入式假体中有60例(18.6%)需要翻修。最常见的原因是无菌性松动22例(37.9%),前路疼痛19例(32.8%)。根据假体模型,A模型修正11次(18.3%),B模型修正49次(81%)。这些结果具有统计学意义(p <0.001)。优势比5.78 (95% CI: 2.87-11.62)。在没有关节置换术专家的团队中,因不稳定进行翻修的比例为8.3%;在只有一名专家的团队中,这个数字是4%;而在由两名专家组成的团队中,这一比例为0%。讨论:关于膝关节置换术的综述越来越多。全膝关节置换术失败的原因取决于几个因素,包括手术技术、植入物、人口统计学变异等。外科医生的经验似乎会影响手术的次数。髌股运动学也影响全膝关节置换术的进展。其中最重要的因素是滑车槽。虽然目前还没有建立最优的转子设计。结论:假体模型影响全膝关节置换术的成活率。手术团队中最好有一位在膝关节置换术方面有专业知识的外科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors Associated with a Short-Term Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasty
Background: To present the short-term complications that required revision surgery on total knee arthroplasty (TKAs) performed during the 2012-2013 period. Objective: To study the relation of complication appearance and type with the prosthesis model and surgical team experience. Methods: Study of patients undergoing TKA at our center between January 2012 and June 2013. Surgical teams were stratified according to the experience of the surgeon. Two different implants were utilized for this study. The following postoperative data were collected: indication for review, time of follow-up from the intervention to the indication for review (in months) and the reason for revision. A total of 322 TKAs were performed. The follow-up time from the placement of the first prosthesis was 35.48 ± 10.23 months. A revision was indicated for 60 of the 322 implanted prostheses (18.6%). The most frequent causes were aseptic loosening in 22 cases (37.9%), and anterior pain in 19 cases (32.8%). According to the prosthetic model, 11 revisions belonged to the A model (18.3%), and 49 (81%) to the B model. These results were statistically significant (p <0.001). Odds Ratio 5.78 (95% CI: 2.87-11.62). In teams with no expert in arthroplasty, the percentage of revision for instability was 8.3%; in teams with one expert, it was 4%; and in teams with two experts, it was 0%. Discussion: There is an increase in the number of reviews in knee arthroplasty surgery. The reasons for failure of total knee arthroplasty depend on several factors, including surgical techniques, implants, demographic variants, etc. The experience of the surgeon seems to influence the number of revisions. Patellofemoral kinematics also influences the evolution of total knee arthroplasty. One of the most important factors is the trochlear groove. Although the optimal troclear design has not been established. Conclusions: The prosthetic model seems to influence the survival of total knee arthroplasty. It is preferable that the surgical team always include a surgeon with expertise in knee arthroplasty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of Mesenteric Ischemia After COVID-19 Vaccination Short Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Super Obese Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial The Intraoperative Finding of a Large Atrial Septum Defect Pre-Liver Transplantation: A Case Report Study on Preventive Intervention of Peri-knee Ecchymosis After Total Knee Replacement Late Primary B Cell Cerebral Lymphoma After Kidney Transplant: A Case Report and Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1