对欧洲合理零售能源价格的追求:积极和规范的维度

Despoina Mantzari
{"title":"对欧洲合理零售能源价格的追求:积极和规范的维度","authors":"Despoina Mantzari","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEX016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public opinion in various EU Member States increasingly perceives energy prices as unreasonable. Primarily owing to distributional concerns, state interference with the liberalized retail energy market is ever-present across many EU Member States, despite its implications for the development of competitive (national and EU) energy markets. Rather than solely engaging with the conditions of state intervention as such, this article takes a step back and argues that an appreciation of what constitutes a reasonable price for energy supply is a necessary prerequisite in determining the relevance, scope, and conditions of state intervention in retail energy prices. In the absence of a definition of the concept in secondary legislation, it offers a novel conceptual framework centred on the contextual interpretation of ‘a reasonable price for energy supply’. This article offers two understandings of reasonableness: one underpinned by the principle of market competition and the other understood as affordability. It elaborates on the different set of conditions and criteria against which they are judged and it explains how these have informed various instruments enshrined in the energy liberalization directives for achieving reasonable prices for end-consumers. These range from consumer empowerment measures to more direct consumer protection measures informed by affordability concerns. After providing a taxonomy of the latter instruments, it examines their respective advantages and disadvantages by focusing on how these are perceived by the EU framework. Its broader aim is to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of what is meant by a ‘reasonable retail energy price’ within the context of national and EU competitive retail energy markets and explore how the resulting tension between the two understandings of reasonableness is accommodated in the broader EU constitutional and institutional context.","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"7 1","pages":"599-627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quest for Reasonable Retail Energy Prices in Europe: Positive and Normative Dimensions\",\"authors\":\"Despoina Mantzari\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/YEL/YEX016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public opinion in various EU Member States increasingly perceives energy prices as unreasonable. Primarily owing to distributional concerns, state interference with the liberalized retail energy market is ever-present across many EU Member States, despite its implications for the development of competitive (national and EU) energy markets. Rather than solely engaging with the conditions of state intervention as such, this article takes a step back and argues that an appreciation of what constitutes a reasonable price for energy supply is a necessary prerequisite in determining the relevance, scope, and conditions of state intervention in retail energy prices. In the absence of a definition of the concept in secondary legislation, it offers a novel conceptual framework centred on the contextual interpretation of ‘a reasonable price for energy supply’. This article offers two understandings of reasonableness: one underpinned by the principle of market competition and the other understood as affordability. It elaborates on the different set of conditions and criteria against which they are judged and it explains how these have informed various instruments enshrined in the energy liberalization directives for achieving reasonable prices for end-consumers. These range from consumer empowerment measures to more direct consumer protection measures informed by affordability concerns. After providing a taxonomy of the latter instruments, it examines their respective advantages and disadvantages by focusing on how these are perceived by the EU framework. Its broader aim is to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of what is meant by a ‘reasonable retail energy price’ within the context of national and EU competitive retail energy markets and explore how the resulting tension between the two understandings of reasonableness is accommodated in the broader EU constitutional and institutional context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"599-627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEX016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEX016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

欧盟各成员国的公众舆论越来越认为能源价格不合理。主要由于分配问题,国家对自由化的零售能源市场的干预在许多欧盟成员国一直存在,尽管它对竞争性(国家和欧盟)能源市场的发展产生了影响。本文并不是单纯地探讨国家干预的条件,而是退后一步,认为对能源供应合理价格的理解是确定国家干预零售能源价格的相关性、范围和条件的必要前提。在二级立法中缺乏概念定义的情况下,它提供了一个新的概念框架,以“能源供应的合理价格”的上下文解释为中心。本文提供了对合理性的两种理解:一种理解基于市场竞争原则,另一种理解为可承受性。它详细阐述了评判这些能源的不同条件和标准,并解释了这些条件和标准如何影响能源自由化指令中所载的各种工具,以便为最终消费者实现合理的价格。这些措施的范围从赋予消费者权力的措施到更直接的消费者保护措施,考虑到负担能力问题。在提供了后一种工具的分类之后,它通过关注欧盟框架如何看待这些工具来检查它们各自的优点和缺点。其更广泛的目标是有助于在国家和欧盟竞争零售能源市场的背景下对“合理零售能源价格”的含义进行更细致的理解,并探索如何在更广泛的欧盟宪法和制度背景下适应两种合理理解之间的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Quest for Reasonable Retail Energy Prices in Europe: Positive and Normative Dimensions
Public opinion in various EU Member States increasingly perceives energy prices as unreasonable. Primarily owing to distributional concerns, state interference with the liberalized retail energy market is ever-present across many EU Member States, despite its implications for the development of competitive (national and EU) energy markets. Rather than solely engaging with the conditions of state intervention as such, this article takes a step back and argues that an appreciation of what constitutes a reasonable price for energy supply is a necessary prerequisite in determining the relevance, scope, and conditions of state intervention in retail energy prices. In the absence of a definition of the concept in secondary legislation, it offers a novel conceptual framework centred on the contextual interpretation of ‘a reasonable price for energy supply’. This article offers two understandings of reasonableness: one underpinned by the principle of market competition and the other understood as affordability. It elaborates on the different set of conditions and criteria against which they are judged and it explains how these have informed various instruments enshrined in the energy liberalization directives for achieving reasonable prices for end-consumers. These range from consumer empowerment measures to more direct consumer protection measures informed by affordability concerns. After providing a taxonomy of the latter instruments, it examines their respective advantages and disadvantages by focusing on how these are perceived by the EU framework. Its broader aim is to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of what is meant by a ‘reasonable retail energy price’ within the context of national and EU competitive retail energy markets and explore how the resulting tension between the two understandings of reasonableness is accommodated in the broader EU constitutional and institutional context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
The unified patent court Corporate tax reform in the European Union: are the stars finally aligned? Rescuing transparency in the digital economy: in search of a common notion in EU consumer and data protection law The impact of the Digital Content Directive on online platforms’ Terms of Service The European Union’s Preferential Trade Agreements: between convergence and differentiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1