检验分层单侧和双侧相关数据的共同风险差异比例

IF 1.4 3区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistica Neerlandica Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1111/stan.12288
Zhiming Li, Changxing Ma, Keyi Mou
{"title":"检验分层单侧和双侧相关数据的共同风险差异比例","authors":"Zhiming Li, Changxing Ma, Keyi Mou","doi":"10.1111/stan.12288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In medical clinical studies, uni‐ and bilateral data naturally occurs if each patient contributes either one or both of paired organ measurements in a stratified design. This paper mainly proposes a common test of risk differences between proportions for stratified uni‐ and bilateral correlated data. Likelihood ratio, score, and Wald‐type test statistics are constructed using global, unconstrained, and constrained maximum likelihood estimations of parameters. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of these test procedures in terms of type I error rates and powers. Empirical results show that the likelihood ratio test is more robust and powerful than other statistics. A real example is used to illustrate the proposed methods.","PeriodicalId":51178,"journal":{"name":"Statistica Neerlandica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the common risk difference of proportions for stratified uni‐ and bilateral correlated data\",\"authors\":\"Zhiming Li, Changxing Ma, Keyi Mou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/stan.12288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In medical clinical studies, uni‐ and bilateral data naturally occurs if each patient contributes either one or both of paired organ measurements in a stratified design. This paper mainly proposes a common test of risk differences between proportions for stratified uni‐ and bilateral correlated data. Likelihood ratio, score, and Wald‐type test statistics are constructed using global, unconstrained, and constrained maximum likelihood estimations of parameters. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of these test procedures in terms of type I error rates and powers. Empirical results show that the likelihood ratio test is more robust and powerful than other statistics. A real example is used to illustrate the proposed methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistica Neerlandica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistica Neerlandica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12288\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistica Neerlandica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在医学临床研究中,如果每个患者在分层设计中提供一种或两种成对的器官测量,则自然会出现单侧和双侧数据。本文主要提出了一种对分层单相关数据和双边相关数据比例之间风险差异的通用检验。似然比、分数和Wald型检验统计量是使用参数的全局、无约束和约束最大似然估计构建的。进行仿真研究以评估这些测试程序在I型错误率和功率方面的性能。实证结果表明,似然比检验比其他统计方法具有更强的稳健性和有效性。最后用一个实例说明了所提出的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing the common risk difference of proportions for stratified uni‐ and bilateral correlated data
In medical clinical studies, uni‐ and bilateral data naturally occurs if each patient contributes either one or both of paired organ measurements in a stratified design. This paper mainly proposes a common test of risk differences between proportions for stratified uni‐ and bilateral correlated data. Likelihood ratio, score, and Wald‐type test statistics are constructed using global, unconstrained, and constrained maximum likelihood estimations of parameters. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of these test procedures in terms of type I error rates and powers. Empirical results show that the likelihood ratio test is more robust and powerful than other statistics. A real example is used to illustrate the proposed methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistica Neerlandica
Statistica Neerlandica 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistica Neerlandica has been the journal of the Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research since 1946. It covers all areas of statistics, from theoretical to applied, with a special emphasis on mathematical statistics, statistics for the behavioural sciences and biostatistics. This wide scope is reflected by the expertise of the journal’s editors representing these areas. The diverse editorial board is committed to a fast and fair reviewing process, and will judge submissions on quality, correctness, relevance and originality. Statistica Neerlandica encourages transparency and reproducibility, and offers online resources to make data, code, simulation results and other additional materials publicly available.
期刊最新文献
Poisson average maximum likelihood‐centred penalized estimator: A new estimator to better address multicollinearity in Poisson regression Orthogonal Contrasts for both Balanced and Unbalanced Designs and both Ordered and Unordered Treatments Estimating function method for nonnegative autoregressive models A partial posterior p value test for multilevel mediation A portmanteau test for the iid hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1