卫生与立法机构:尼日利亚的案例

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI:10.1080/23288604.2018.1441622
Olanrewaju Tejuoso, Gafar Alawode, E. Baruwa
{"title":"卫生与立法机构:尼日利亚的案例","authors":"Olanrewaju Tejuoso, Gafar Alawode, E. Baruwa","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2018.1441622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health Politics—Engagement, Alignment, and Mobilization of Political Will and Legislative Functions How Legislatures’ Strengthened Engagement Is Working in Nigeria Next Steps: Growing the Economy to Strengthen Health Care References What can political actors do to strengthen the health system and, conversely, how can ministries of health ensure that the political actors do that? Politics and health are intertwined: Obamacare and the National Health Service were major issues in the most recent US and UK elections, with each party promising to increase access to quality health care. In Nigeria, too, politicians at all levels of government promise their constituents better access. Nonetheless, over a quarter of the 201,000 sub-Saharan African women who die in childbirth are Nigerian, only 15% of the 407,000 Nigerians with tuberculosis have been identified, and immunization rates vary from 10% to 80% across Nigerian states. The country’s health system is financially and managerially overwhelmed by various disease burdens. Despite the great need for public resources, the budget allocation to health has fallen every year, from 6.2% of the total budget in 2015 to a proposed 3.9% for 2018. This forces Nigerians to pay for their own care, which is often of mediocre quality and risks pushing many of them further into poverty. Though weaknesses in health financing and governance are known contributors to the current state of Nigeria’s health system, this commentary looks beyond the health sector to discuss what an underutilized yet critical group of non-health actors—specifically, the legislature—can do to improve the functioning of the health system. A country health system that fulfills its responsibilities to citizens cannot function in isolation—it needs good governance in terms of policy making, appropriations, oversight, and accountability mechanisms. That is, democratically elected governments/legislatures must pass informed policies and laws that govern the health system and allocate adequate resources to a ministry of health. The responsibility of oversight—ensuring that those resources are spent efficiently and effectively on the elected government’s priorities—belongs to the arms of government that can call ministries or associations to account. Failure of a health system in a democracy should have consequences through accountability mechanisms both within government, such as elections, and outside of government,","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health and the Legislature: The Case of Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Olanrewaju Tejuoso, Gafar Alawode, E. Baruwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23288604.2018.1441622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Health Politics—Engagement, Alignment, and Mobilization of Political Will and Legislative Functions How Legislatures’ Strengthened Engagement Is Working in Nigeria Next Steps: Growing the Economy to Strengthen Health Care References What can political actors do to strengthen the health system and, conversely, how can ministries of health ensure that the political actors do that? Politics and health are intertwined: Obamacare and the National Health Service were major issues in the most recent US and UK elections, with each party promising to increase access to quality health care. In Nigeria, too, politicians at all levels of government promise their constituents better access. Nonetheless, over a quarter of the 201,000 sub-Saharan African women who die in childbirth are Nigerian, only 15% of the 407,000 Nigerians with tuberculosis have been identified, and immunization rates vary from 10% to 80% across Nigerian states. The country’s health system is financially and managerially overwhelmed by various disease burdens. Despite the great need for public resources, the budget allocation to health has fallen every year, from 6.2% of the total budget in 2015 to a proposed 3.9% for 2018. This forces Nigerians to pay for their own care, which is often of mediocre quality and risks pushing many of them further into poverty. Though weaknesses in health financing and governance are known contributors to the current state of Nigeria’s health system, this commentary looks beyond the health sector to discuss what an underutilized yet critical group of non-health actors—specifically, the legislature—can do to improve the functioning of the health system. A country health system that fulfills its responsibilities to citizens cannot function in isolation—it needs good governance in terms of policy making, appropriations, oversight, and accountability mechanisms. That is, democratically elected governments/legislatures must pass informed policies and laws that govern the health system and allocate adequate resources to a ministry of health. The responsibility of oversight—ensuring that those resources are spent efficiently and effectively on the elected government’s priorities—belongs to the arms of government that can call ministries or associations to account. Failure of a health system in a democracy should have consequences through accountability mechanisms both within government, such as elections, and outside of government,\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2018.1441622\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2018.1441622","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

卫生政治——政治意愿和立法职能的参与、协调和动员立法机构加强参与在尼日利亚如何发挥作用下一步:发展经济以加强卫生保健参考资料政治行为者可以做些什么来加强卫生系统,反过来,卫生部如何确保政治行为者这样做?政治和健康是交织在一起的:奥巴马医改(Obamacare)和国民医疗服务体系(National health Service)是最近美国和英国大选的主要议题,两党都承诺增加获得优质医疗服务的机会。在尼日利亚也是如此,各级政府的政客们都向他们的选民承诺,让他们更容易获得医疗服务。然而,在201000名死于分娩的撒哈拉以南非洲妇女中,超过四分之一是尼日利亚人,在407000名尼日利亚结核病患者中,只有15%得到确认,尼日利亚各州的免疫接种率从10%到80%不等。该国的卫生系统因各种疾病负担而在财政和管理上不堪重负。尽管对公共资源的需求很大,但卫生预算拨款每年都在下降,从2015年占总预算的6.2%降至2018年的拟议3.9%。这迫使尼日利亚人自己支付医疗费用,而医疗质量往往一般,而且有可能使他们中的许多人进一步陷入贫困。虽然卫生筹资和治理方面的弱点是尼日利亚卫生系统目前状况的已知因素,但本评论将目光投向卫生部门之外,讨论未得到充分利用但至关重要的非卫生行为体群体(特别是立法机构)在改善卫生系统运作方面可以做些什么。一个履行其对公民责任的国家卫生系统不能孤立地运作——它需要在政策制定、拨款、监督和问责机制方面实行良好治理。也就是说,民主选举的政府/立法机构必须通过明智的政策和法律来管理卫生系统,并为卫生部分配足够的资源。监督的责任——确保这些资源高效有效地用在民选政府的优先事项上——属于政府部门,它可以要求部委或协会承担责任。民主国家卫生系统的失败应通过政府内部(如选举)和政府外部的问责机制产生后果,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health and the Legislature: The Case of Nigeria
Health Politics—Engagement, Alignment, and Mobilization of Political Will and Legislative Functions How Legislatures’ Strengthened Engagement Is Working in Nigeria Next Steps: Growing the Economy to Strengthen Health Care References What can political actors do to strengthen the health system and, conversely, how can ministries of health ensure that the political actors do that? Politics and health are intertwined: Obamacare and the National Health Service were major issues in the most recent US and UK elections, with each party promising to increase access to quality health care. In Nigeria, too, politicians at all levels of government promise their constituents better access. Nonetheless, over a quarter of the 201,000 sub-Saharan African women who die in childbirth are Nigerian, only 15% of the 407,000 Nigerians with tuberculosis have been identified, and immunization rates vary from 10% to 80% across Nigerian states. The country’s health system is financially and managerially overwhelmed by various disease burdens. Despite the great need for public resources, the budget allocation to health has fallen every year, from 6.2% of the total budget in 2015 to a proposed 3.9% for 2018. This forces Nigerians to pay for their own care, which is often of mediocre quality and risks pushing many of them further into poverty. Though weaknesses in health financing and governance are known contributors to the current state of Nigeria’s health system, this commentary looks beyond the health sector to discuss what an underutilized yet critical group of non-health actors—specifically, the legislature—can do to improve the functioning of the health system. A country health system that fulfills its responsibilities to citizens cannot function in isolation—it needs good governance in terms of policy making, appropriations, oversight, and accountability mechanisms. That is, democratically elected governments/legislatures must pass informed policies and laws that govern the health system and allocate adequate resources to a ministry of health. The responsibility of oversight—ensuring that those resources are spent efficiently and effectively on the elected government’s priorities—belongs to the arms of government that can call ministries or associations to account. Failure of a health system in a democracy should have consequences through accountability mechanisms both within government, such as elections, and outside of government,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1