伊朗语双语者与单语者英语词汇学习策略的比较研究

Farzad Sabeki, R. Karimzadeh
{"title":"伊朗语双语者与单语者英语词汇学习策略的比较研究","authors":"Farzad Sabeki, R. Karimzadeh","doi":"10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(01-10)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study is an attempt to explore English vocabulary learning strategies employed by Iranian EFL undergraduate Baluch-Persian bilingual and Persian monolingual students in the University of Sistan and Baluchestan. The study utilized a between-groups research design. The participants of this study were 33 bilingual (Baluch-Persian) and 34 monolingual (Persian) students with an intermediate level of English. Their age ranged from 19 to 24 and. In order to collect the data, adapted version of Schmitt’s (1997) Vocabulary Learning Strategy Questionnaire (VLSQ) with a five-point Likert scale was administrated. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test. The results indicated that EFL students use a wide range of vocabulary learning strategies. Furthermore, the findings revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between bilinguals and monolinguals regarding English VLSs. Finally, the paper ends up with a number of pedagogical implications for English teachers.","PeriodicalId":53031,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of English Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Iranian Bilinguals and Monolinguals\",\"authors\":\"Farzad Sabeki, R. Karimzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(01-10)\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study is an attempt to explore English vocabulary learning strategies employed by Iranian EFL undergraduate Baluch-Persian bilingual and Persian monolingual students in the University of Sistan and Baluchestan. The study utilized a between-groups research design. The participants of this study were 33 bilingual (Baluch-Persian) and 34 monolingual (Persian) students with an intermediate level of English. Their age ranged from 19 to 24 and. In order to collect the data, adapted version of Schmitt’s (1997) Vocabulary Learning Strategy Questionnaire (VLSQ) with a five-point Likert scale was administrated. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test. The results indicated that EFL students use a wide range of vocabulary learning strategies. Furthermore, the findings revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between bilinguals and monolinguals regarding English VLSs. Finally, the paper ends up with a number of pedagogical implications for English teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(01-10)\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arts and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(01-10)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在探讨伊朗锡斯坦-俾路支斯坦大学英语本科生俾路支-波斯语双语和波斯语单语学生的英语词汇学习策略。本研究采用组间研究设计。本研究的参与者是33名双语(俾路支-波斯语)和34名英语水平中等的单语(波斯语)学生。他们的年龄从19岁到24岁不等。为了收集数据,采用Schmitt(1997)的词汇学习策略调查问卷(VLSQ),采用李克特五点量表。数据分析采用描述性统计和独立样本t检验。结果表明,英语学习者使用了广泛的词汇学习策略。此外,研究结果显示双语者和单语者在英语VLSs方面没有统计学上的显著差异。最后,本文提出了一些对英语教师的教学启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of English Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Iranian Bilinguals and Monolinguals
The present study is an attempt to explore English vocabulary learning strategies employed by Iranian EFL undergraduate Baluch-Persian bilingual and Persian monolingual students in the University of Sistan and Baluchestan. The study utilized a between-groups research design. The participants of this study were 33 bilingual (Baluch-Persian) and 34 monolingual (Persian) students with an intermediate level of English. Their age ranged from 19 to 24 and. In order to collect the data, adapted version of Schmitt’s (1997) Vocabulary Learning Strategy Questionnaire (VLSQ) with a five-point Likert scale was administrated. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test. The results indicated that EFL students use a wide range of vocabulary learning strategies. Furthermore, the findings revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between bilinguals and monolinguals regarding English VLSs. Finally, the paper ends up with a number of pedagogical implications for English teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
ظاهرة الطلاق في منطقة حائل بالمملكة العربية السعودية " الأسباب والآثار والحلول" "التحليل التمييزي للرضا الطلابي عن خدمات جامعة عجمان بدولة الامارات العربية المتحدة" دراسة ميدانية دَور الحَملات الاتصالية للعلاقاتُ العامةُ فِي مُديريةِ الأمنِ العام الأردني فِي التَوعية بِخَطر المُخدِرات اللُّغة الشِّعرية وعلاقتها بالمعنى النَّصِّيِّ من خلال القول بالضَّرورة لدى ابن الشَّجريِّ توظيف هيئة صحة دبي لمنصة الإنستغرام للتوعية بجائحة كرونا: دراسة تحليلية
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1