南非用水定价和水基础设施系统融资

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT Infrastructure Asset Management Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1680/jinam.21.00015
C. Ruiters, Joe Amadi-Echendu
{"title":"南非用水定价和水基础设施系统融资","authors":"C. Ruiters, Joe Amadi-Echendu","doi":"10.1680/jinam.21.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The water infrastructure value chain is hierarchical in South Africa, i.e. national, provincial and local government, based on administrative and political boundaries. Differential water use pricing recognises neither the full replacement nor full recovery costs. The mean water use charge for all the Water Management Areas (water basins or catchments) was US$0.185/m3 (SD = ±0.09), agriculture (irrigation) <US$0.002/m3, forestry <US$0.001/m3 ([Formula: see text] = 0.0006; SD = ±0.0004), and 0.0553 US$/m3 (SD = ±0.066) for domestic and industrial. The mean year-on-year increases for water use was >20%. The mean annual bulk treated water use tariff was US$0.315/m3 (SD = ±0.242) and increases varied significantly, i.e. 14.33% (SD = ±20.57). The national mean domestic water use tariffs varied from US$0.238/m3 (SD = ±0.310) to US$0.988/m3 (SD = ±0.450) for the pre-determined water use blocks and increased between 13.6% (SD = ±7.7) to 16.9% (SD = ±0.4). Rural municipalities charged ca. 10% below the equivalent water use tariffs than urban areas. Commercial and industrial water use tariffs were higher than the domestic water use tariffs in the lower blocks and in line in the higher water use blocks, i.e. ca. 178.68% (SD = ±256.99). The water use multipliers varied substantially between 3 and 15, i.e. from raw water to municipal retail.","PeriodicalId":43387,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructure Asset Management","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water use pricing and financing of water infrastructure systems in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"C. Ruiters, Joe Amadi-Echendu\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jinam.21.00015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The water infrastructure value chain is hierarchical in South Africa, i.e. national, provincial and local government, based on administrative and political boundaries. Differential water use pricing recognises neither the full replacement nor full recovery costs. The mean water use charge for all the Water Management Areas (water basins or catchments) was US$0.185/m3 (SD = ±0.09), agriculture (irrigation) <US$0.002/m3, forestry <US$0.001/m3 ([Formula: see text] = 0.0006; SD = ±0.0004), and 0.0553 US$/m3 (SD = ±0.066) for domestic and industrial. The mean year-on-year increases for water use was >20%. The mean annual bulk treated water use tariff was US$0.315/m3 (SD = ±0.242) and increases varied significantly, i.e. 14.33% (SD = ±20.57). The national mean domestic water use tariffs varied from US$0.238/m3 (SD = ±0.310) to US$0.988/m3 (SD = ±0.450) for the pre-determined water use blocks and increased between 13.6% (SD = ±7.7) to 16.9% (SD = ±0.4). Rural municipalities charged ca. 10% below the equivalent water use tariffs than urban areas. Commercial and industrial water use tariffs were higher than the domestic water use tariffs in the lower blocks and in line in the higher water use blocks, i.e. ca. 178.68% (SD = ±256.99). The water use multipliers varied substantially between 3 and 15, i.e. from raw water to municipal retail.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infrastructure Asset Management\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infrastructure Asset Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.21.00015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructure Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.21.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

南非的水基础设施价值链是分层的,即国家、省和地方政府,以行政和政治边界为基础。不同的水价既不包括全部的替代成本,也不包括全部的回收成本。所有水管理区(流域或集水区)的平均用水费用为0.185美元/立方米(SD =±0.09),农业(灌溉)为20%。年平均大宗水处理费为0.315美元/立方米(SD =±0.242),增幅显著,为14.33% (SD =±20.57)。全国平均生活水费从0.238美元/立方米(SD =±0.310)到0.988美元/立方米(SD =±0.450)不等,在13.6% (SD =±7.7)到16.9% (SD =±0.4)之间增长。农村地区的水费比城市地区的水费低10%左右。商业和工业用水费在低用水区高于生活用水费,在高用水区基本一致,约为178.68% (SD =±256.99)。用水乘数在3到15之间变化很大,即从原水到市政零售。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Water use pricing and financing of water infrastructure systems in South Africa
The water infrastructure value chain is hierarchical in South Africa, i.e. national, provincial and local government, based on administrative and political boundaries. Differential water use pricing recognises neither the full replacement nor full recovery costs. The mean water use charge for all the Water Management Areas (water basins or catchments) was US$0.185/m3 (SD = ±0.09), agriculture (irrigation) 20%. The mean annual bulk treated water use tariff was US$0.315/m3 (SD = ±0.242) and increases varied significantly, i.e. 14.33% (SD = ±20.57). The national mean domestic water use tariffs varied from US$0.238/m3 (SD = ±0.310) to US$0.988/m3 (SD = ±0.450) for the pre-determined water use blocks and increased between 13.6% (SD = ±7.7) to 16.9% (SD = ±0.4). Rural municipalities charged ca. 10% below the equivalent water use tariffs than urban areas. Commercial and industrial water use tariffs were higher than the domestic water use tariffs in the lower blocks and in line in the higher water use blocks, i.e. ca. 178.68% (SD = ±256.99). The water use multipliers varied substantially between 3 and 15, i.e. from raw water to municipal retail.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Exploration of the impact of junction characteristics on pedestrian red light violation Viability rubric of FRP composites for civil infrastructure applications Automated early estimation of bridge interventions, possession windows and costs Multi-objective optimization of building planning energy saving based on genetic algorithm Evaluating the impact of flexible offices in coping with the uncertainty on future demand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1