说的是啊!人-代理谈判中偏好与信任的跨文化复杂性

Johnathan Mell, Gale M. Lucas, J. Gratch, A. Rosenfeld
{"title":"说的是啊!人-代理谈判中偏好与信任的跨文化复杂性","authors":"Johnathan Mell, Gale M. Lucas, J. Gratch, A. Rosenfeld","doi":"10.1109/ACII.2015.7344571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Negotiation between virtual agents and humans is a complex field that requires designers of systems to be aware not only of the efficient solutions to a given game, but also the mechanisms by which humans create value over multiple negotiations. One way of considering the agent's impact beyond a single negotiation session is by considering the use of external “ledgers” across multiple sessions. We present results that describe the effects of favor exchange on negotiation outcomes, fairness, and trust for two distinct cross-cultural populations, and illustrate the ramifications of their similarities and differences on virtual agent design.","PeriodicalId":6863,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)","volume":"1 1","pages":"194-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Saying YES! The cross-cultural complexities of favors and trust in human-agent negotiation\",\"authors\":\"Johnathan Mell, Gale M. Lucas, J. Gratch, A. Rosenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACII.2015.7344571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Negotiation between virtual agents and humans is a complex field that requires designers of systems to be aware not only of the efficient solutions to a given game, but also the mechanisms by which humans create value over multiple negotiations. One way of considering the agent's impact beyond a single negotiation session is by considering the use of external “ledgers” across multiple sessions. We present results that describe the effects of favor exchange on negotiation outcomes, fairness, and trust for two distinct cross-cultural populations, and illustrate the ramifications of their similarities and differences on virtual agent design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"194-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

虚拟代理和人类之间的谈判是一个复杂的领域,要求系统设计师不仅要了解给定游戏的有效解决方案,还要了解人类在多次谈判中创造价值的机制。考虑代理在单个协商会话之外的影响的一种方法是考虑跨多个会话使用外部“分类账”。我们的研究结果描述了两种不同的跨文化人群的偏好交换对谈判结果、公平和信任的影响,并说明了它们的相似性和差异对虚拟代理设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Saying YES! The cross-cultural complexities of favors and trust in human-agent negotiation
Negotiation between virtual agents and humans is a complex field that requires designers of systems to be aware not only of the efficient solutions to a given game, but also the mechanisms by which humans create value over multiple negotiations. One way of considering the agent's impact beyond a single negotiation session is by considering the use of external “ledgers” across multiple sessions. We present results that describe the effects of favor exchange on negotiation outcomes, fairness, and trust for two distinct cross-cultural populations, and illustrate the ramifications of their similarities and differences on virtual agent design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Avatar and participant gender differences in the perception of uncanniness of virtual humans Neural conditional ordinal random fields for agreement level estimation Fundamental frequency modeling using wavelets for emotional voice conversion Bimodal feature-based fusion for real-time emotion recognition in a mobile context Harmony search for feature selection in speech emotion recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1