{"title":"Karca ś(j)as ve σοῦα(ν)","authors":"Zsolt Simon","doi":"10.37095/gephyra.1202238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The similarity of two terms of Carian funerary terminology, ś(j)as ‘funerary monument’ (attested in Carian inscriptions) and σοῦα(ν) ‘tomb’ (preserved by Stephan of Byzantium) was recognized long ago, but their connection, if it exists at all, is unclear. This paper argues that both forms go back to the same underlying word by regular phonological and morphological processes.","PeriodicalId":37539,"journal":{"name":"Gephyra","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gephyra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.1202238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
卡里安丧葬术语的两个术语,作为“丧葬纪念碑”(在卡里安碑文中得到证实)和σο ο α(ν)“坟墓”(由拜占庭的斯蒂芬保存)的相似性很久以前就被认识到,但它们之间的联系,如果存在的话,是不清楚的。本文认为,这两种形式都可以通过规则的语音和形态过程回到同一个潜在的单词。
The similarity of two terms of Carian funerary terminology, ś(j)as ‘funerary monument’ (attested in Carian inscriptions) and σοῦα(ν) ‘tomb’ (preserved by Stephan of Byzantium) was recognized long ago, but their connection, if it exists at all, is unclear. This paper argues that both forms go back to the same underlying word by regular phonological and morphological processes.
GephyraArts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Gephyra - a Journal for the Ancient History and Cultures of the Eastern Mediterranean - is an open access publication platform for articles from all fields of research into Asia Minor and the Eastern Mediterranean, insofar as they shed new light on the history and culture of this geographical and historical region. Scope: Epigraphic, archaeological, numismatic and art historical contributions, commented and evaluated material presentations, as well as historical reflections and essays are all equally welcome.